The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment contained in current clinical practice guidelines for patients with non-specific low back pain in primary care. We also aimed to examine how recommendations have changed since our last overview in 2010.

Cost of illness study alongside a randomized controlled trial. To describe the costs of care for patients with low back pain (1) and to identify patient characteristics as predictors for high health care cost during a 1-year follow-up (2). Low back pain (LBP) is one of the leading causes of high health care costs in industrialized countries (Life time prevalence, 70%). A lot of research has been done to improve primary health care and patients′ prognosis. However, the cost of health care does not necessarily follow changes in patient outcomes. General practitioners (n = 126) recruited 1378 patients consulting for LBP. Sociodemographic data, pain characteristics, and LBP-related cost data were collected by interview at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Costs were evaluated from the societal perspective. Predictors of high cost during the subsequent year were studied using logistic regression analysis. Mean direct and indirect costs for LBP care are about twice as high for patients with chronic LBP compared to acutely ill patients. Indirect costs account for more than 52% to 54% of total costs. About 25% of direct costs refer to therapeutic procedures and hospital or rehabilitational care. Patients with high disability and limitations in daily living show a 2- to 5-fold change for subsequent high health care costs. Depression seems to be highly relevant for direct health care utilization. Interventions designed to reduce high health care costs for LBP should focus on patients with severe LBP and depressive comorbidity. Our results add to the economic understanding of LBP care and may give guidance for future actions on health care improvement and cost reduction.

For many years, low back pain has been both the leading cause of days lost from work and the leading indication for medical rehabilitation (1, 2). Musculoskeletal diseases have been second only to mental disorders in recent years as a cause of early...

Background: Inappropriate prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in hospital and primary care have been widely reported. Recommendations from hospital have been implicated as one reason for inappropriate prescriptions of PPI in primary care. Objective: To quantify the amount of appropriate PPI recommendations in hospital discharge letters and the influence of these recommendations on general practitioners’ (GPs’) PPI-prescriptions. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study in 31 primary care practices. We identified patients discharged from hospital with PPI recommendation between 2006 and 2007 and assessed practice records and PPI prescription six months prior and after hospital admission. Hospital recommendation for continuous PPI-treatment and continuation by GPs was classified as appropriate, inappropriate or uncertain. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate factors associated with indicated and non-indicated PPI continuation. Results: In 263 (58%) out of 506 patients discharged from 35 hospitals with a PPI recommendation no indication could be found. Non-indicated PPIs were continued by GPs in 58% for at least 1 month. Indicated PPIs were discontinued in 33%. Two thirds of non-indicated PPIs were initiated in hospital. The strongest factor associated with non-indicated continuation was a PPI-prescription prior to hospital admission [OR: 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7–5.4]. This was also the strongest factor for continuation of an indicated PPI medication (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.4–7.5). Conclusions: We found a strong influence of hospital recommendations and previous prescriptions on PPI prescriptions after discharge. Hospitals should critically review their practice of recommending PPI and document indications. GPs should carefully assess hospital recommendations and their medication prior to admission to avoid over- and under-prescribing.

Although most respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are due to viral infections, they cause the majority of antibiotic (Abx) prescriptions in primary care. This systematic review summarises the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions in primary care aiming to reduce Abx prescriptions in patients ≥ 13 years for acute RTI. We searched the databases “MEDLINE/PubMed” and “Cochrane Library” for the period from January 1, 2005, to August 31, 2016, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in primary care aiming at the reduction of Abx prescriptions for patients suffering from RTI. Out of 690 search results, 67 publications were retrieved and 17 RCTs were included. We assumed an absolute change of 10% as minimal important change. Twelve out of 17 included RCTs showed statistically significant lower Abx prescription rates in the intervention groups, but only six of them reported a clinically relevant reduction according to our definition. Communication skills training (CST) and point-of-care testing (POCT) were the most effective interventions. Pre-intervention Abx prescription rates varied between 13.5% and 80% and observed reductions ranged from 1.5 to 23.3%. Studies with post-intervention rates lower than 20% had no significant effects. Post-intervention observation periods ranged from 2 weeks up to 3.5 years. The design of the trials was heterogeneous precluding calculation of pooled effect size. The reporting of many RCTs was poor. CST and POCT alone or as adjunct can reduce antibiotic prescriptions for RTI. Eleven out of 17 trials were not successfully reducing Abx prescription rates according to our definition of minimal important change. However, five of them reported a statistically significant reduction. Trials with initially lower prescription rates were less likely to be successful. Future trials should investigate sustainability of intervention effects for a longer time period. The generalisability of findings was limited due to heterogeneous designs and outcome measures. Therefore, a consensus of designing and reporting of studies aiming at reducing antibiotic prescriptions is urgently needed to generate meaningful evidence.

Cluster randomized controlled trial. To improve quality of care for patients with low back pain (LBP) a multifaceted general practitioner education alone and in combination with motivational counseling by practice nurses has been implemented in German general practices. We studied effects on functional capacity (main outcome), days in pain, physical activity, quality of life, or days of sick leave (secondary outcomes) compared with no intervention. International research has lead to the development of the German LBP guideline for general practitioners. However, there is still doubt about the most effective implementation strategy. Although effects on process of care have been observed frequently, changes in patient outcomes are rarely seen. We recruited 1378 patients with LBP in 118 general practices, which were randomized to 1 of 3 study arms: a multifaceted guideline implementation (GI), GI plus training of practice nurses in motivational counseling (MC), and the postal dissemination of the guideline (controls, C). Data were collected (questionnaires and patient interviews) at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Multilevel mixed effects modeling was used to adjust for clustering of data and potential confounders. After 6 months, functional capacity was higher in the intervention groups with a cluster adjusted mean difference of 3.650 between the MC group and controls (95% CI = 0.320–6.979, P = 0.032) and 2.652 between the GI group and controls (95% CI = −0.704 to 6.007, P = 0.120). Intervention effects were more pronounced regarding days in pain per year with an average reduction of 16 (GI) to 17 days (MC) after 6 months (12 and 9 days after 12 months) compared with controls. Active implementation of the German LBP guideline results in slightly better outcomes during 6 months follow-up than its postal dissemination. Results are more distinct when practice nurses are trained in motivational counseling.