Qi Pei

Dr. Qi Pei

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJing Wang
Jing Wang
JHJie Huang
Jie Huang
SYShuang Yang
Shuang Yang
CCChang Cui
Chang Cui
LYLing Ye
Ling Ye
QPQi Pei
Qi Pei
Purpose: To assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of pure S-ketamine (esketamine) in Chinese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and evaluate the potential advantage of esketamine in clinical treatment compared with racemate ketamine hydrochloride injection. Patients and methods: A randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, Phase I study was performed with 32 patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Patients received a single dose of esketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or racemic ketamine (1 mg/kg, esketamine:R-ketamine=1:1), injected in 10 s. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. The concentrations of esketamine, R-ketamine, S-norketamine, and R-norketamine were measured with a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Results: After administering a single dose of esketamine and racemate ketamine, the pharmacokinetics parameters of esketamine and S-norketamine are both similar in treatment groups. The clearance of esketamine in two groups was 18.1±3.2 and 18.4±3.4 mL/min•kg, respectively. However, in the ketamine group, esketamine has a larger clearance than R-ketamine (18.4±3.4 mL/min·kg vs 15.8±3.1 mL/min·kg, P<0.001). Further analysis showed that gender did not affect the pharmacokinetics of esketamine and racemate ketamine. Regarding the safety of esketamine and racemate ketamine, no serious adverse events were observed during treatment, and the incidences of adverse events were 75.0% (esketamine) and 87.5% (racemate ketamine). The main adverse reactions were dizziness, agitation, nausea, vomiting, headache, and fatigue. However, compared with racemic ketamine, esketamine offers a shorter recovery time (9 mins vs. 13 mins, P<0.05) and orientation recovery time (11.5 mins vs. 17 mins, P<0.05) after short anesthesia. Conclusion: Esketamine administration as a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg was generally safe and tolerated in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. In terms of anesthesia, a relatively small dose of esketamine can be used instead of racemate ketamine for routine treatment without consideration of gender differences.

3 February 2025 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHShuqi Huang
Shuqi Huang
QXQihan Xu
Qihan Xu
GYGuoping Yang
Guoping Yang
JDJunjie Ding
Junjie Ding
QPQi Pei
Qi Pei

19 October 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJingjing Yu
Jingjing Yu
YHYuling Huang
Yuling Huang
LLLijuan Liu
Lijuan Liu
JWJing Wang
Jing Wang
JYJiye Yin
Jiye Yin
CGCheng-Xian Guo
Cheng-Xian Guo
Genetic polymorphisms of Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes are associated with the efficacy and toxicities of radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma Genetic polymorphisms of Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes are associated with the efficacy and toxicities of radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

18 May 2022 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NYNan Yang
Nan Yang
JWJing Wang
Jing Wang
YXYueliang Xie
Yueliang Xie
JDJunjie Ding
Junjie Ding
CWCuifang Wu
Cuifang Wu
QPQi Pei
Qi Pei
Routine clinical meropenem therapeutic drug monitoring data can be applied to model-informed precision dosing. The current study aimed to evaluate the adequacy and predictive capabilities of the published models with routine meropenem data and identify the dosing adaptations using a priori and Bayesian estimation. For this, 14 meropenem models for the external evaluation carried out on an independent cohort of 134 patients with 205 meropenem concentrations were encoded in NONMEM 7.3. The performance was determined using: 1) prediction-based and simulation-based diagnostics; and 2) predicted meropenem concentrations by a priori prediction using patient covariates only; and Bayesian forecasting using previous observations. The clinical implications were assessed according to the required dose adaptations using the meropenem concentrations. All assessments were stratified based on the patients with or without continuous renal replacement therapy. Although none of the models passed all tests, the model by Muro et al. showed the least bias. Bayesian forecasting could improve the predictability over an a priori approach, with a relative bias of −11.63–68.89% and −302.96%–130.37%, and a relative root mean squared error of 34.99–110.11% and 14.78–241.81%, respectively. A dosing change was required in 40.00–68.97% of the meropenem observation results after Bayesian forecasting. In summary, the published models couldn’t adequately describe the meropenem pharmacokinetics of our center. Although the selection of an initial meropenem dose with a priori prediction is challenging, the further model-based analysis combining therapeutic drug monitoring could be utilized in the clinical practice of meropenem therapy.

15 May 2010 in Journal of Fluorescence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QZQing-Ping Zuo
Qing-Ping Zuo
BLBing Li
Bing Li
QPQi Pei
Qi Pei
ZLZuojun Li
Zuojun Li
SLShi-Kun Liu
Shi-Kun Liu

3 August 2021 in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYa-Qian Li
Ya-Qian Li
KCKai-Feng Chen
Kai-Feng Chen
JDJun-Jie Ding
Jun-Jie Ding
HTHong-Yi Tan
Hong-Yi Tan
NYNan Yang
Nan Yang
QPQi Pei
Qi Pei