Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, which is associated in >95% with a high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Methylation of specific genes has been closely associated with the progress of cervical high-grade dysplastic lesions to invasive carcinomas. Therefore, DNA methylation has been proposed as a triage for women infected with high-risk HPV. Methylation analyses of cervical cancer tissue have shown that cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1) and myelin and lymphocyte protein (MAL) methylation are present in over 90% of all cervical high-grade neoplasias and invasive cervical cancers. Here, we established a liquid biopsy-based assay to detect MAL and CADM1 methylation in cell free (cf)DNA of cervical cancer. Methylation of the target gene was validated on bisulfite converted smear-DNA from cervical dysplasia patients and afterward applied to cfDNA using quantitative real-time PCR. In 52 smears, a combined analysis of CADM1 and/or MAL (CADM1/MAL) showed methylation in 86.5% of the cases. In cfDNA samples of 24 cervical cancer patients, CADM1/MAL methylation was detected in 83.3% of the cases. CADM1/MAL methylation was detected already in 81.8% of stage I-II patients showing the high sensitivity of this liquid biopsy assay. In combination with a specificity of 95.5% towards healthy donors (HD) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, CADM1/MAL cfDNA methylation detection might represent a novel and promising liquid biopsy marker in cervical cancer.

Purpose: Post-treatment follow-up in women with cervical pre-cancers (CIN3) is mandatory due to relapse in up to 10% of patients. Standard follow-up based on hrHPV-DNA/cytology co-testing has high sensitivity but limited specificity. The aim of our prospective, multicenter, observational study was to test the hypothesis that an individualized viral-cellular-junction test (vcj-PCR) combined with cytology has a lower false positive rate for the prediction of recurrence compared to standard co-testing. Methods: Pre-surgical cervical swabs served for the identification of HPV16/18 DNA integration sites by next-generation-sequencing (NGS). Samples taken at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery were evaluated by cytology, hrHPV-DNA and the patients’ individual HPV-integration sites (vcj-PCR on the basis of NGS). Results: Integration sites were detected in 48 of 445 patients (10.8%), 39 of them had valid follow-up data. The false positive rate was 18.2% (95% CI 8.6–34.4%) for standard hrHPV/cytology at six months compared to 12.1% (95% CI 4.8–27.3%) for vcj-PCR/cytology, respectively (McNemar p = 0.50). Six patients developed recurrences (1 CIN2, 5 CIN3) during follow-up. Standard co-testing detected all, whereas vcj-PCR/cytology detected only five patients with recurrences. Data of 269 patients without evidence of HPV16/18 integration were subject to post-hoc analyses. Standard co-testing revealed a false positive rate of 15.7% (95% CI 11.7–20.7%) and predicted ten of fourteen recurrences at six months. Conclusions: Although highly specific on its own vcj-PCR could not detect all recurrent CIN2/3. Possible reasons for this unexpected result may be multifocal lesions, intratumoral heterogeneity with respect to HPV integration and/or incident CIN.

To date, therapeutic strategies in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) are lacking molecular pathological information and targeted therapy hasn’t been approved in the treatment of VSCC, yet. Two etiological pathways are widely accepted: HPV induced vs. HPV independent, associated with chronic skin disease, often harboring TP53 mutations (mut). The aim of this analysis was to analyze the RNA expression patterns for subtype stratification on VSCC samples that can be integrated into the previously performed whole exome sequencing data for the detection of prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets. We performed multiplex gene expression analysis (NanoString) with 770 genes in 24 prior next generation sequenced samples. An integrative data analysis was performed. Here, 98 genes were differentially expressed in TP53mut vs. HPV+ VSCC, in the TP53mut cohort, where 56 genes were upregulated and 42 were downregulated in comparison to the HPV+ tumors. Aberrant expression was primarily observed in cell cycle regulation, especially in HPV+ disease. Within the TP53mut group, a distinct cluster was identified that was correlated to a significantly worse overall survival (p = 0.017). The RNA expression profiles showed distinct patterns with regard to the known VSCC subtypes and could potentially enable further subclassification in the TP53mut groups

The need for pelvic treatment in patients with node-positive vulvar cancer (VSCC) and the value of pelvic lymphadenectomy (LAE) as a staging procedure to plan adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is controversial. In this retrospective, multicenter analysis, 306 patients with primary node-positive VSCC treated at 33 gynecologic oncology centers in Germany between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed. All patients received surgical staging of the groins; nodal status was as follows: 23.9% (73/306) pN1a, 23.5% (72/306) pN1b, 20.4% (62/306) pN2a/b, and 31.9% (97/306) pN2c/pN3. A total of 35.6% (109/306) received pelvic LAE; pelvic nodal involvement was observed in 18.5%. None of the patients with nodal status pN1a or pN1b and pelvic LAE showed pelvic nodal involvement. Taking only patients with nodal status ≥pN2a into account, the rate of pelvic involvement was 25%. In total, adjuvant RT was applied in 64.4% (197/306). Only half of the pelvic node-positive (N+) patients received adjuvant RT to the pelvis (50%, 10/20 patients); 41.9% (122/291 patients) experienced recurrent disease or died. In patients with histologically-confirmed pelvic metastases after LAE, distant recurrences were most frequently observed (7/20 recurrences). Conclusions: A relevant risk regarding pelvic nodal involvement was observed from nodal status pN2a and higher. Our data support the omission of pelvic treatment in patients with nodal status pN1a and pN1b.

Background: Surgery is the backbone of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) management. However, in practice, there is disagreement about the extent of surgical staging and whether additional adjuvant treatment should be provided. As omitting relevant diagnostic or therapeutic procedures might lead to undertreatment, we aimed to structurally investigate treatment practice in addition to prognostic factors in a multicentre series of patients (pts) diagnosed with early-stage OC. Patients: Within this retrospective, multicentre study, medical records of 379 pts who had undergone surgery for suspected early-stage OC between January 2014 and March 2020 were analysed. Results: Of the 379 patients, 292 had pT stage 1a-2a and had complete data on the extent of surgical staging. At least one surgical step was omitted in 100 pts (34.2%). Complete surgical staging (n = 192; (65.8%)) was more often performed in high-grade serous OC and was independent of the healthcare level of the hospital where the initial diagnosis was made. Missing to take peritoneal biopsies was associated with reduced relapse-free-survival in incompletely staged, pT1 cases (p = 0.03). About every second patient (46.7%) with a final stage lower than FIGO IIB and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy received combination chemotherapy. BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing was only performed in a subset of pts, and mutations were detected in 18% (14/79) and 9% (7/85) pts, respectively. Conclusions: This study helps to increase our understanding of early-stage OC treatment and prognosis. In addition to treating patients in compliance with current guidelines, the need for BRCA testing should also be considered for early-stage OC.