Lukas Magee

Mr. Lukas Magee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2021 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Daniel J. JohnsonDaniel J. Johnson
Daniel J. Johnson
LMLukas Magee
Lukas Magee
KPKarun Pandit
Karun Pandit
JBJacqueline Bourdon
Jacqueline Bourdon
EBEben N. Broadbent
Eben N. Broadbent
SBStephanie A. Bohlman
Stephanie A. Bohlman

1 January 2021 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLukas Magee
Lukas Magee
AWAmy Wolf
Amy Wolf
RHRobert Howe
Robert Howe
JSJonathan Schubbe
Jonathan Schubbe
KHKari Hagenow
Kari Hagenow
BTBenjamin Turner
Benjamin Turner

1 September 2024 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJoseph A. LaManna
Joseph A. LaManna
FHFlorian Hartig
Florian Hartig
JMJonathan A. Myers
Jonathan A. Myers
RFRobert Freckleton
Robert Freckleton
MDMatteo Detto
Matteo Detto
CDCamille S. Delavaux
Camille S. Delavaux

10 June 2024 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLukas Magee
Lukas Magee
JLJoseph A. LaManna
Joseph A. LaManna
AWAmy T. Wolf
Amy T. Wolf
RHRobert W. Howe
Robert W. Howe
YLYuanming Lu
Yuanming Lu
Daniel J. JohnsonDaniel J. Johnson
Daniel J. Johnson

28 September 2022 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAlbert Y. Kim
Albert Y. Kim
VHValentine Herrmann
Valentine Herrmann
RBRoss Barreto
Ross Barreto
BCBrianna Calkins
Brianna Calkins
EGErika Gonzalez‐Akre
Erika Gonzalez‐Akre
KAKristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
Accurate field data are essential to understanding ecological systems and forecasting their responses to global change. Yet, data collection errors are common, and data analysis often lags far enough behind its collection that many errors can no longer be corrected, nor can anomalous observations be revisited. Needed is a system in which data quality assurance and control (QA/QC), along with the production of basic data summaries, can be automated immediately following data collection. Here, we implement and test a system to satisfy these needs. For two annual tree mortality censuses and a dendrometer band survey at two forest research sites, we used GitHub Actions continuous integration (CI) to automate data QA/QC and run routine data wrangling scripts to produce cleaned datasets ready for analysis. This system automation had numerous benefits, including (1) the production of near real‐time information on data collection status and errors requiring correction, resulting in final datasets free of detectable errors, (2) an apparent learning effect among field technicians, wherein original error rates in field data collection declined significantly following implementation of the system, and (3) an assurance of computational reproducibility—that is, robustness of the system to changes in code, data and software. By implementing CI, researchers can ensure that datasets are free of any errors for which a test can be coded. The result is dramatically improved data quality, increased skill among field technicians, and reduced need for expert oversight. Furthermore, we view CI implementation as a first step towards a data collection and analysis pipeline that is also more responsive to rapidly changing ecological dynamics, making it better suited to study ecological systems in the current era of rapid environmental change.

13 January 2022 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLukas Magee
Lukas Magee
KPKarun Pandit
Karun Pandit
SFS. Luke Flory
S. Luke Flory
RCRaelene Crandall
Raelene Crandall
Eben BroadbentEben Broadbent
Eben Broadbent
Daniel J. JohnsonDaniel J. Johnson
Daniel J. Johnson
Determining mechanisms of plant establishment in ecological communities can be particularly difficult in disturbance-dominated ecosystems. Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) and its associated plant community exemplify systems that evolved with disturbances, where frequent, widespread fires alter the population dynamics of longleaf pine within distinct life stages. We identified the primary biotic and environmental conditions that influence the survival of longleaf pine in this disturbance-dominated ecosystem. We combined data from recruitment surveys, tree censuses, dense lidar point clouds, and a forest-wide prescribed fire to examine the response of longleaf pine individuals to fire and biotic neighborhoods. We found that fire temperatures increased with increasing longleaf pine neighborhood basal area and decreased with higher oak densities. There was considerable variation in longleaf pine survival across life stages, with lowest survival probabilities occurring during the bolt stage and not in the earlier, more fire-resistant grass stage. Survival of grass-stage, bolt-stage, and sapling longleaf pines was negatively associated with basal area of neighboring longleaf pine and positively related to neighboring heterospecific tree density, primarily oaks (Quercus spp.). Our findings highlight the vulnerability of longleaf pine across life stages, which suggests optimal fire management strategies for controlling longleaf pine density, and—more broadly—emphasize the importance of fire in mediating species interactions.