Emily J. Baird

Dr. Emily J. Baird

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2013 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMarie Dacke
Marie Dacke
EBEmily J. Baird
Emily J. Baird
MBMarcus Byrne
Marcus Byrne
CSClarke H. Scholtz
Clarke H. Scholtz
EWEric J. Warrant
Eric J. Warrant

15 October 2005 in Journal of Experimental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEmily J. Baird
Emily J. Baird
MSMandyam Srinivasan
Mandyam Srinivasan
SZShaowu Zhang
Shaowu Zhang
ACAnn Cowling
Ann Cowling
Visual control of flight speed in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) was investigated by training them to fly through a specially constructed tunnel in which the motion, contrast and texture of the patterns lining the walls could be varied. Manipulation of pattern motion revealed that the speed of flight is controlled by regulating the image motion that is experienced by the eyes. Flight speed is surprisingly robust to changes in the contrast and/or spatial texture of the visual environment, suggesting that the underlying movement-detecting mechanisms estimate the speed of image motion in the eye largely independently of these parameters. This ensures that flight speed depends primarily on the distances to nearby surfaces and not upon their particular visual properties, such as contrast or visual texture. The removal of image motion cues drastically compromises the regulation of flight speed, underscoring their role in this function.

28 October 2013 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEmily J. Baird
Emily J. Baird
NBNorbert Boeddeker
Norbert Boeddeker
MIMichael R. Ibbotson
Michael R. Ibbotson
MSMandyam Srinivasan
Mandyam Srinivasan
Significance: In this study, we investigate the cues that honey bees use to land on vertical surfaces. We show that bees use the apparent rate of expansion of the image generated by the surface to smoothly reduce their speed when landing. From our results, we develop a mathematical model for visually guided landing that, unlike all current engineering-based methods, does not require knowledge about either the distance to the surface or the speed at which it is approached. This strategy is not only specific to landings on vertical surfaces or to honey bees but represents a universal strategy that any flying agent (animal or machine) could use to land safely on surfaces of any orientation.

26 February 2019 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gavin J TaylorGavin J Taylor
Gavin J Taylor
PTPierre Tichit
Pierre Tichit
MSMarie D Schmidt
Marie D Schmidt
ABAndrew J Bodey
Andrew J Bodey
CRChristoph Rau
Christoph Rau
EBEmily J. Baird
Emily J. Baird
The quality of visual information that is available to an animal is limited by the size of its eyes. Differences in eye size can be observed even between closely related individuals, yet we understand little about how this affects vision. Insects are good models for exploring the effects of size on visual systems because many insect species exhibit size polymorphism. Previous work has been limited by difficulties in determining the 3D structure of eyes. We have developed a novel method based on x-ray microtomography to measure the 3D structure of insect eyes and to calculate predictions of their visual capabilities. We used our method to investigate visual allometry in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and found that size affects specific aspects of vision, including binocular overlap, optical sensitivity, and dorsofrontal visual resolution. This reveals that differential scaling between eye areas provides flexibility that improves the visual capabilities of larger bumblebees.

1 September 2010 in Journal of Experimental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LDLaura Dittmar
Laura Dittmar
WSWolfgang Stürzl
Wolfgang Stürzl
EBEmily J. Baird
Emily J. Baird
NBNorbert Boeddeker
Norbert Boeddeker
MEMartin Egelhaaf
Martin Egelhaaf
SUMMARY: Visual landmarks guide humans and animals including insects to a goal location. Insects, with their miniature brains, have evolved a simple strategy to find their nests or profitable food sources; they approach a goal by finding a close match between the current view and a memorised retinotopic representation of the landmark constellation around the goal. Recent implementations of such a matching scheme use raw panoramic images (‘image matching’) and show that it is well suited to work on robots and even in natural environments. However, this matching scheme works only if relevant landmarks can be detected by their contrast and texture. Therefore, we tested how honeybees perform in localising a goal if the landmarks can hardly be distinguished from the background by such cues. We recorded the honeybees' flight behaviour with high-speed cameras and compared the search behaviour with computer simulations. We show that honeybees are able to use landmarks that have the same contrast and texture as the background and suggest that the bees use relative motion cues between the landmark and the background. These cues are generated on the eyes when the bee moves in a characteristic way in the vicinity of the landmarks. This extraordinary navigation performance can be explained by a matching scheme that includes snapshots based on optic flow amplitudes (‘optic flow matching’). This new matching scheme provides a robust strategy for navigation, as it depends primarily on the depth structure of the environment.

15 May 2010 in Journal of Experimental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEmily J. Baird
Emily J. Baird
TKTorill Kornfeldt
Torill Kornfeldt
MDMarie Dacke
Marie Dacke
To control flight, flying insects extract information from the pattern of visual motion generated during flight, known as optic flow. To regulate their ground speed, insects such as honeybees and Drosophila hold the rate of optic flow in the axial direction (front-to-back) constant. A consequence of this strategy is that its performance varies with the minimum viewing angle (the deviation from the frontal direction of the longitudinal axis of the insect) at which changes in axial optic flow are detected. The greater this angle, the later changes in the rate of optic flow, caused by changes in the density of the environment, will be detected. The aim of the present study is to examine the mechanisms of ground speed control in bumblebees and to identify the extent of the visual range over which optic flow for ground speed control is measured. Bumblebees were trained to fly through an experimental tunnel consisting of parallel vertical walls. Flights were recorded when (1) the distance between the tunnel walls was either 15 or 30 cm, (2) the visual texture on the tunnel walls provided either strong or weak optic flow cues and (3) the distance between the walls changed abruptly halfway along the tunnel's length. The results reveal that bumblebees regulate ground speed using optic flow cues and that changes in the rate of optic flow are detected at a minimum viewing angle of 23–30 deg., with a visual field that extends to approximately 155 deg. By measuring optic flow over a visual field that has a low minimum viewing angle, bumblebees are able to detect and respond to changes in the proximity of the environment well before they are encountered.