Alberto Loro

Dr. Alberto Loro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2023 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAlberto Loro
Alberto Loro
MBMargherita Beatrice Borg
Margherita Beatrice Borg
MBMarco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia
AAAngelo Paolo Amico
Angelo Paolo Amico
RARoberto Antenucci
Roberto Antenucci
Alessio BaricichAlessio Baricich
Alessio Baricich
Background: Balance impairment is a common disability in post-stroke survivors, leading to reduced mobility and increased fall risk. Robotic gait training (RAGT) is largely used, along with traditional training. There is, however, no strong evidence about RAGT superiority, especially on balance. This study aims to determine RAGT efficacy on balance of post-stroke survivors. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PeDRO databases were investigated. Randomized clinical trials evaluating RAGT efficacy on post-stroke survivor balance with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) or Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were searched. Meta-regression analyses were performed, considering weekly sessions, single-session duration, and robotic device used. Results: A total of 18 trials have been included. BBS pre-post treatment mean difference is higher in RAGT-treated patients, with a pMD of 2.17 (95% CI 0.79; 3.55). TUG pre-post mean difference is in favor of RAGT, but not statistically, with a pMD of −0.62 (95%CI − 3.66; 2.43). Meta-regression analyses showed no relevant association, except for TUG and treatment duration (β = −1.019, 95% CI − 1.827; −0.210, p-value = 0.0135). Conclusions: RAGT efficacy is equal to traditional therapy, while the combination of the two seems to lead to better outcomes than each individually performed. Robot-assisted balance training should be the focus of experimentation in the following years, given the great results in the first available trials. Given the massive heterogeneity of included patients, trials with more strict inclusion criteria (especially time from stroke) must be performed to finally define if and when RAGT is superior to traditional therapy.

12 December 2021 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia
Lucia CosenzaLucia Cosenza
Lucia Cosenza
LSLorenza Scotti
Lorenza Scotti
MBMichele Bertoni
Michele Bertoni
MPMarco Polverelli
Marco Polverelli
Alessio BaricichAlessio Baricich
Alessio Baricich
Equinovarus foot is one of the most commonly spasticity related conditions in stroke survivors, leading to an impaired gait and poor functional performances. Notably, spastic muscles undergo a dynamic evolution following typical pathophysiological patterns. Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) is the gold standard for focal spasticity treatment, and ultrasound (US) imaging is widely recommended to guide injections and monitor muscle evolution. The role of BoNT-A in influencing muscle fibroadipose degeneration is still unclear. In this study, we analyzed medial gastrocnemius (MG) and soleus (SOL) US characteristics (cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, pennation angle, and mean echo intensity) in 53 patients. MG and SOL alterations, compared to the unaffected side, depend on the spasticity only and not on the BoNT-A treatment. In functionally preserved patients (functional ambulation classification, FAC > 3; modified Ashworth scale, MAS ≤ 2), the ultrasonographic changes of MG compared to ipsilateral SOL observed in the paretic limb alone seems to be due to histological, anatomical, pathophysiological, and biomechanical differences between the two muscles. In subjects with poor walking capability and more severe spasticity, such ipsilateral difference was found in both calves. In conclusion, BoNT-A does not seem to influence muscle degeneration. Similar muscles undergo different evolution depending on the grade of walking deficit and spasticity.

21 March 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMargherita Beatrice Borg
Margherita Beatrice Borg
MBMarco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia
LMLaura Mittino
Laura Mittino
ALAlberto Loro
Alberto Loro
LLLaura Lanzotti
Laura Lanzotti
Alessio BaricichAlessio Baricich
Alessio Baricich
Background/Objectives: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a significant complication of breast cancer (BC) treatment, characterized by swelling and fluid accumulation. Many risk factors have already been proven to be related to BCRL; meanwhile, many others are still debated and poorly investigated in the literature. This study investigated the potential involvement of commonly prescribed chronic medications in BCRL development. Methods: This observational retrospective cohort study included 162 post-surgical breast cancer survivors attending an oncological rehabilitation outpatient service between January 2021 and April 2023. BCRL was diagnosed by physicians through clinical evaluation and objective measures (≥2 cm increase in circumferential girth measurements). Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics, and Cox regression models (univariable and multivariable) were employed to analyze risk factors for BCRL. Results: BCRL was observed in 53% of participants. The univariable model identified BMI (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.11), overweight (BMI ≥ 25) (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.95–2.25), and breast prosthesis implantation (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.09–2.80) as potential risk factors for lymphedema. In the multivariable model, overweight (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.18–7.14), hypertension (HR 5.09, 95% CI 1.88–13.79), radiotherapy (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.43–9.38), and breast prosthesis implantation (HR 8.93, 95% CI 2.77–28.81) were identified as independent risk factors for BCRL. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for further research to understand the role of chronic medications in BCRL risk comprehensively.

9 January 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMargherita Beatrice Borg
Margherita Beatrice Borg
LMLaura Mittino
Laura Mittino
MBMarco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia
ALAlberto Loro
Alberto Loro
LLLaura Lanzotti
Laura Lanzotti
Alessio BaricichAlessio Baricich
Alessio Baricich
Axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a highly prevalent surgical complication affecting BC survivors. It presents as a subcutaneous cording that limits the upper limb range of motion (ROM) and causes pain. Its etiology is still debated, and its treatment is not well defined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of our specific AWS rehabilitative treatment protocol. We conducted an observational retrospective study on a cohort of 92 AWS patients referred to the oncological outpatient service of a university hospital. We collected data from medical records before (T0) and after (T1) the treatment. The studied protocol was composed of 60-min sessions, carried out 3 times/week by specialized physiotherapists, until the clinical resolution of AWS. We found that a mean of 8.74 ± 2.12 rehabilitative sessions were needed, and only one patient stopped early. At T1, shoulder ROM was complete in both abduction and flexion in 98% of patients; AWS was no longer detectable in 64% of them, and pain significantly decreased compared to T0. In conclusion, our protocol proved to be safe, well-tolerated and seemed to be effective in treating AWS.

5 August 2024 in Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessio BaricichAlessio Baricich
Alessio Baricich
MBMarco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia
MBMargherita Beatrice Borg
Margherita Beatrice Borg
ALAlberto Loro
Alberto Loro
PMPaola Morlino
Paola Morlino
TDThierry Deltombe
Thierry Deltombe
Objective: To compare the effect of rectus femoris diagnostic motor nerve blocks (DNB) with anaesthetics and rectus femoris muscle botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) injection in multiple sclerosis patients with unilateral stiff-knee gait. Design: Prospective observational study Subjects/Patients: Multiple sclerosis patients in stable condition. Methods: Patients underwent evaluation before and 1 hour after the anaesthetic block, and 1 month after the botulinum injection. Assessment included a 10-m walking test, a 6-minute walking test, a timed-up-and-go (TUG) test, and a Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Post-DNB and post-BoNT-A satisfaction was measured with the global assessment of efficacy scale. Results: Fourteen patients with unilateral stiff-knee gait due to multiple sclerosis underwent a DNB, among whom 13 received botulinum injections in the rectus femoris muscle after a satisfying test result. Positive post-DNB results correlated with significant functional improvements after BoNT-A. Higher EDSS and longer time from diagnosis correlated with poorer post-DNB and post-BoNT-A absolute outcomes. Conclusion: DNB showed predictive value for BoNT-A outcomes, especially in the case of worse functional status. It effectively predicted endurance and walking speed improvement, while TUG showed greater improvement after botulinum. In cases of uncertain therapeutic benefit, nerve blocks may provide a valuable diagnostic support, particularly in patients with lower functional status.

19 August 2022 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia
MBMargherita Beatrice Borg
Margherita Beatrice Borg
Lara TorganoLara Torgano
Lara Torgano
ALAlberto Loro
Alberto Loro
LCLucia Cosenza
Lucia Cosenza
Alessio BaricichAlessio Baricich
Alessio Baricich
Botulinum Neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) is the treatment of choice for focal post-stroke spasticity (PSS). Due to its mechanism of action and the administration method, some authors raised concern about its possible systemic diffusion leading to contralateral muscle weakness and autonomic nervous system (ANS) alterations. Stroke itself is a cause of motor disability and ANS impairment; therefore, it is mandatory to prevent any source of additional loss of strength and adjunctive ANS disturbance. We enrolled 15 hemiparetic stroke survivors affected by PSS already addressed to BoNT-A treatment. Contralateral handgrip strength and ANS parameters, such as heart rate variability, impedance cardiography values, and respiratory sinus arrythmia, were measured 24 h before (T0) and 10 days after (T1) the ultrasound (US)-guided BoNT-A injection. At T1, neither strength loss nor modification of the basal ANS patterns were found. These findings support recent literature about the safety profile of BoNT-A, endorsing the importance of the US guide for a precise targeting and the sparing of “critical” structures as vessels and nerves.