Ulf Ziemann

Prof. Ulf Ziemann

University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 October 2020 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Simone RossiSimone Rossi
Simone Rossi
AAAndrea Antal
Andrea Antal
SBSven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann
MBMarom Bikson
Marom Bikson
CBCarmen Brewer
Carmen Brewer
MHMark Hallett
Mark Hallett
This article is based on a consensus conference, promoted and supported by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which took place in Siena (Italy) in October 2018. The meeting intended to update the ten-year-old safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings (Rossi et al., 2009). Therefore, only emerging and new issues are covered in detail, leaving still valid the 2009 recommendations regarding the description of conventional or patterned TMS protocols, the screening of subjects/patients, the need of neurophysiological monitoring for new protocols, the utilization of reference thresholds of stimulation, the managing of seizures and the list of minor side effects. New issues discussed in detail from the meeting up to April 2020 are safety issues of recently developed stimulation devices and pulse configurations; duties and responsibility of device makers; novel scenarios of TMS applications such as in the neuroimaging context or imaging-guided and robot-guided TMS; TMS interleaved with transcranial electrical stimulation; safety during paired associative stimulation interventions; and risks of using TMS to induce therapeutic seizures (magnetic seizure therapy). An update on the possible induction of seizures, theoretically the most serious risk of TMS, is provided. It has become apparent that such a risk is low, even in patients taking drugs acting on the central nervous system, at least with the use of traditional stimulation parameters and focal coils for which large data sets are available. Finally, new operational guidelines are provided for safety in planning future trials based on traditional and patterned TMS protocols, as well as a summary of the minimal training requirements for operators, and a note on ethics of neuroenhancement.

1 October 2015 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UZUlf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann
JRJanine Reis
Janine Reis
PSPeter Schwenkreis
Peter Schwenkreis
MRMario Rosanova
Mario Rosanova
ASAntonio Strafella
Antonio Strafella
FMFlorian Müller-Dahlhaus
Florian Müller-Dahlhaus

1 May 2016 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Antonio SuppaAntonio Suppa
Antonio Suppa
YHY.-Z. Huang
Y.-Z. Huang
KFKlaus Funke
Klaus Funke
MRM.C. Ridding
M.C. Ridding
BCB. Cheeran
B. Cheeran
JRJ.C. Rothwell
J.C. Rothwell
Over the last ten years, an increasing number of authors have used the theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol to investigate long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity non-invasively in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy humans and in patients with various types of movement disorders. We here provide a comprehensive review of the LTP/LTD-like plasticity induced by TBS in the human M1. A workgroup of researchers expert in this research field review and discuss critically ten years of experimental evidence from TBS studies in humans and in animal models. The review also includes the discussion of studies assessing responses to TBS in patients with movement disorders. We discuss experimental studies applying TBS over the M1 or in other cortical regions functionally connected to M1 in healthy subjects and in patients with various types of movement disorders. We also review experimental evidence coming from TBS studies in animals. Finally, we clarify the status of TBS as a possible new non-invasive therapy aimed at improving symptoms in various neurological disorders.

18 May 2022 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HSHartwig R. Siebner
Hartwig R. Siebner
KFKlaus Funke
Klaus Funke
AAAman S. Aberra
Aman S. Aberra
AAAndrea Antal
Andrea Antal
SBSven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann
YUYoshikazu Ugawa
Yoshikazu Ugawa
Transcranial (electro)magnetic stimulation (TMS) is currently the method of choice to non-invasively induce neural activity in the human brain. A single transcranial stimulus induces a time-varying electric field in the brain that may evoke action potentials in cortical neurons. The spatial relationship between the locally induced electric field and the stimulated neurons determines axonal depolarization. The induced electric field is influenced by the conductive properties of the tissue compartments and is strongest in the superficial parts of the targeted cortical gyri and underlying white matter. TMS likely targets axons of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The propensity of individual axons to fire an action potential in response to TMS depends on their geometry, myelination and spatial relation to the imposed electric field and the physiological state of the neuron. The latter is determined by its transsynaptic dendritic and somatic inputs, intrinsic membrane potential and firing rate. Modeling work suggests that the primary target of TMS is axonal terminals in the crown top and lip regions of cortical gyri. The induced electric field may additionally excite bends of myelinated axons in the juxtacortical white matter below the gyral crown. Neuronal excitation spreads ortho- and antidromically along the stimulated axons and causes secondary excitation of connected neuronal populations within local intracortical microcircuits in the target area. Axonal and transsynaptic spread of excitation also occurs along cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical connections, impacting on neuronal activity in the targeted network. Both local and remote neural excitation depend critically on the functional state of the stimulated target area and network. TMS also causes substantial direct co-stimulation of the peripheral nervous system. Peripheral co-excitation propagates centrally in auditory and somatosensory networks, but also produces brain responses in other networks subserving multisensory integration, orienting or arousal. The complexity of the response to TMS warrants cautious interpretation of its physiological and behavioural consequences, and a deeper understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of TMS will be critical for advancing it as a scientific and therapeutic tool.

1 March 2018 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CZChristoph Zrenner
Christoph Zrenner
DDDebora Desideri
Debora Desideri
PBPaolo Belardinelli
Paolo Belardinelli
UZUlf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann

1 May 2019 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSara Tremblay
Sara Tremblay
NRNigel Rogasch
Nigel Rogasch
IPIsabella Premoli
Isabella Premoli
DBDaniel M. Blumberger
Daniel M. Blumberger
SCSilvia Casarotto
Silvia Casarotto
ZDZafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis