Objective. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), myocardial fibrosis is routinely shown by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. We evaluated the efficacy of 2 novel contrast-free CMR methods, namely, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and feature-tracking (FT) method, in detecting myocardial fibrosis. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 26 patients with HCM. Visual and quantitative comparisons were made between DWI and LGE images. Regional longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains were compared between LGE-positive and LGE-negative segments. Moreover, global strains were compared between LGE-positive and LGE-negative patients as well as between patients with mild and marked LGE. Results. All 3 strains showed significant differences between LGE-positive and LGE-negative segments ( ). The regional longitudinal and circumferential strain parameters showed significant associations with LGE ( ), while regional circumferential strain was the only independent predictor of LGE in logistic regression models (OR: 1.140, 95% CI: 1.073 to 1.207, ). A comparison of global strains between patients with LGE percentages of below 15% and above 15% demonstrated that global circumferential strain was the only parameter to show impairment in the group with marked myocardial fibrosis, with borderline significance ( ). A review of 212 segments demonstrated a qualitative visual agreement between DWI and LGE in 193 segments (91%). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient was comparable between LGE-positive and LGE-negative segments ( ). Conclusions. FT-CMR, especially regional circumferential strain, can reliably show fibrosis-containing segments in HCM. Further, DWI can function as an efficient qualitative method for the estimation of the fibrosis extent in HCM.

(1) Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious condition that is associated with many cardiopulmonary diseases. Invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) is currently the only method for the definitive diagnosis and follow-up of PAH. In this study, we sought a non-invasive hemodynamic biomarker for the diagnosis of PAH. (2) Methods: We applied prospectively respiratory and cardiac gated 4D-flow MRI at a 9.4T preclinical scanner on three different groups of Sprague Dawley rats: baseline (n = 11), moderate PAH (n = 8), and severe PAH (n = 8). The pressure gradients as well as the velocity values were analyzed from 4D-flow data and correlated with lung histology. (3) Results: The pressure gradient between the pulmonary artery and vein on the unilateral side as well as the time-averaged mean velocity values of the small pulmonary arteries were capable of distinguishing not only between baseline and severe PAH, but also between the moderate and severe stages of the disease. (4) Conclusions: The current preclinical study suggests the pulmonary arteriovenous pressure gradient and the time-averaged mean velocity as potential biomarkers to diagnose PAH.

Purpose: Prospectively-gated Cartesian 4D-flow (referred to as Cartesian-4D-flow) imaging suffers from long TE and intensified flow-related intravoxel-dephasing especially in preclinical ultra-high field MRI. The ultra-short-echo (UTE) 4D-flow technique can resolve the signal loss in higher-order blood flows; however, the long scan time of the high resolution UTE-4D-flow is considered as a disadvantage for preclinical imaging. To compensate for prolonged acquisitions, an accelerated k₀-navigated golden-angle center-out stack-of-stars 4D-flow sequence (referred to as SoS-4D-flow) was implemented at 9.4T and the results were compared to conventional Cartesian-4D-flow mapping in-vitro and in-vivo.Methods: The study was conducted in three steps (A) In-vitro evaluation in a static phantom: to quantify the background velocity bias. (B) In-vitro evaluation in a flowing water phantom: to investigate the effects of polar undersampling (US) on the measured velocities and to compare the spatial velocity profiles between both sequences. (C) In-vivo evaluations: 24 C57BL/6 mice were measured by SoS-4D-flow (n = 14) and Cartesian-4D-flow (n = 10). The peak systolic velocity in the ascending aorta and the background velocity in the anterior chest wall were analyzed for both techniques and were compared to each other.Results: According to the in-vitro analysis, the background velocity bias was significantly lower in SoS-4D-flow than in Cartesian-4D-flow (p < 0.05). Polar US in SoS-4D-flow influenced neither the measured velocity values nor the spatial velocity profiles in comparison to Cartesian-4D-flow. The in-vivo analysis showed significantly higher diastolic velocities in Cartesian-4D-flow than in SoS-4D-flow (p < 0.05). A systemic background bias was observed in the Cartesian velocity maps which influenced their streamline directions and magnitudes.Conclusion: The results of our study showed that at 9.4T SoS-4D-flow provided higher accuracy in slow flow imaging than Cartesian-4D-flow, while the same measurement time could be achieved.

Hemodynamic analysis of blood flow is critical for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases and investigating cardiovascular parameters, such as aneurysms and wall shear stress. For subject-specific analyses, the anatomy and blood flow of the subject can be captured non-invasively using structural and 4D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), respectively. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), on the other hand, can be used to generate blood flow simulations. To generate and analyze subject-specific blood flow simulations, MRI and CFD have to be brought together. We present an interactive, customizable, and user-oriented visual analysis tool that integrates measured data and CFD simulations. Thus, our open-source tool supports both medical and numerical analysis workflows. It enables the creation of simulation ensembles with a high variety of parameters. Furthermore, it allows for visual and analytical examination of simulations and measurements through 2D embeddings. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our tool, we applied it to three real-world use cases, showcasing its ability to configure simulation ensembles and analyze blood flow. We evaluated our example cases together with MRI and CFD experts. By combining the strengths of both CFD and MRI, our tool provides a comprehensive understanding of hemodynamic parameters, facilitating accurate analysis of hemodynamic biomarkers.