Aim The present study evaluated maximum principal stress, von Mises stress, and deformation on the mandible and surrounding structures during the insertion of an implant in various anatomical positions. Materials and Methods Finite clement models of straight two-piece implants of 4.5 mm x 11.5 mm were modeled using Ansys software, v. 16.0 (Ansys, Inc., Houston, TX, USA). The mandibular model was derived through cone-beam computed tomography of a cadaveric mandible using Mimics software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). An osteotomy was performed at the first molar region, second premolar region, lateral incisor region, central incisor region, canine region, and second molar region that had varying bone densities. Implant insertion was simulated with a variable load of 1 - 180 Newton, which was applied axially downward with a rotational velocity of 30 - 120 rpm. Maximum principal stresses, von Mises stress distribution at the implant insertion site, and maximum deformation on the entire mandible were recorded during the insertion of the implants. Results Maximum principal stress was highest in the crestal area of the right first molar region and least in the middle third of the central incisor region during implant insertion. Von Mises stress in the mandible was highest in the right first molar region and the least in the lateral incisor region during implant insertion. The extent deformation was recorded on the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis of the mandible. Deformation on the x-axis was highest at the crestal region of the canine and least for the lateral incisor. On the y-axis, deformation was highest at the symphysis region during implant insertion at the first molar region and the least at the condylar area during implant placement in the canine area. On the z-axis, the deformation was highest at the condylar region during implant insertion at the first molar region, and the least was observed in the symphysis region during implant placement in the second molar region. Conclusion When overall stress was considered, there is a direct correlation between stress and quality of bone. The highest maximum principal stress and von Mises stress were recorded during the placement of implants in posterior regions of the mandible, which suggests that the presence of dense cortical bone results in higher stress values. The maximum deformation was observed at different regions of the mandible, away from the site of implant insertion. The resultant stress and deformation exerted on the bone during placement of implants at different sites in the mandible varies, which could be detrimental factors in the longevity of the implant.

Conventional osteotomy techniques can, in some cases, induce higher stress on bone during implant insertion as a result of higher torque. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the stress exerted on the underlying osseous tissues during the insertion of a tapered implant using different osteotomy techniques through a dynamic finite element analysis which has been widely applied to study biomedical problems through computer-aided software. In three different types of osteotomy techniques, namely conventional (B1), bone tap (B2), and countersink (B3), five models and implants designed per technique were prepared, implant insertion was simulated, and stress exerted by the implant during each was evaluated. Comparison of stress scores on the cortical and cancellous bone at different time points and time intervals from initiation of insertion to the final placement of the implant was made. There was a highly statistically significant difference between B1 and B2 (p = 0.0001) and B2 and B3 (p = 0.0001) groups. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in the stress scores between B1 and B3 (p = 0.3080) groups at all time points of implant placement. Overall, a highly significant difference was observed between the stresses exerted in each technique. Within the limitations of our study, bone tap significantly exerted lesser stresses on the entire bone than conventional and countersink type of osteotomy procedures. Considering the stress distribution at the crestal region, the countersink showed lower values in comparison to others.

Background and aim: Assessment of dentofacial asymmetries and other discrepancies that can affect the horizontal reference lines should be considered initially as a part of the esthetic diagnosis. Some variations of facial asymmetry are not considered an esthetic liability. So the aim of the present study is to determine a layperson’s preference regarding transverse occlusal plane (TOP) orientation in fabrication of a complete denture. Materials and methods: A total of 100 subjects who are edentulous and have enrolled for complete denture fabrication were selected. Photograph of the patient’s face was obtained from the frontal perspective on the day of try-in. The image obtained was edited to orient the occlusal plane in three different cants, zero degree, two degrees, and four degrees to the inter-pupillary line (IL) and presented to the patient. The obtained results were statistically analyzed. Results: The observed data was analyzed using Friedman’s test and Wilcoxon test was used for comparing ordinal data between groups. There was a statistically significant difference in acceptance depending on angulation, χ2(2) = 183.2, p = 0.0001. Conclusion: A cant of two degrees is not perceived by the subject but some subjects’ preference of occlusal plane may be altered according to the commissural canting which cannot be incorporated in complete denture fabrication.