Mithilesh K. Dikshit

Dr. Mithilesh K. Dikshit

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institute of Infrastructure Technology Research and Management, Ahmedabad, India
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 October 2022 in Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPrasenjit Sarkhel
Prasenjit Sarkhel
MDMithilesh K. Dikshit
Mithilesh K. Dikshit
VPVimal Kumar Pathak
Vimal Kumar Pathak
KSKuldeep K. Saxena
Kuldeep K. Saxena
CPC. Prakash
C. Prakash
DBDharam Buddhi
Dharam Buddhi

1 July 2019 in Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMithilesh K. Dikshit
Mithilesh K. Dikshit
JAJatin Anand
Jatin Anand
DNDevesh Narayan
Devesh Narayan
SJSubham Jindal
Subham Jindal

1 January 2014 in Procedia Materials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMithilesh K. Dikshit
Mithilesh K. Dikshit
APAsit Baran Puri
Asit Baran Puri
AMAtanu Maity
Atanu Maity
ABAmit Jyoti Banerjee
Amit Jyoti Banerjee
The stability of the machine tool mainly depend on the cutting force in machining process. In the present study, the influence of cutting speed, feed per tooth, axial depth of cut and radial depth of cut during high speed ball-end milling of Al2014-T6 under dry condition has been studied. Response surface methodology was used for generating the experimental plan for conducting the experiment. The cutting force components i.e. tangential and radial forces were measured and then analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. It has been found that the quadratic model is best fitted for prediction of the force components. The analysis of result shows that the cutting forces increases as increase in feed per tooth and axial depth of cut but decreases with increase in cutting speed. Radial depth of cut has significant effect on the cutting force components. The optimization of cutting force components was done by coupling response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. The optimization process was performed in MATLB

29 February 2016 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMithilesh K. Dikshit
Mithilesh K. Dikshit
APAsit B Puri
Asit B Puri
AMAtanu Maity
Atanu Maity
Surface roughness is one of the most important requirements of the finished products in machining process. The determination of optimal cutting parameters is very important to minimize the surface roughness of a product. This article describes the development process of a surface roughness model in high-speed ball-end milling using response surface methodology based on design of experiment. Composite desirability function and teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm have been used for determining optimal cutting process parameters. The experiments have been planned and conducted using rotatable central composite design under dry condition. Mathematical model for surface roughness has been developed in terms of cutting speed, feed per tooth, axial depth of cut and radial depth of cut as the cutting process parameters. Analysis of variance has been performed for analysing the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness. A second-order full quadratic model is used for mathematical modelling. The analysis of the results shows that the developed model is adequate enough and good to be accepted. Analysis of variance for the individual terms revealed that surface roughness is mostly affected by the cutting speed with a percentage contribution of 47.18% followed by axial depth of cut by 10.83%. The optimum values of cutting process parameters obtained through teaching-learning-based optimization are feed per tooth ( fz) = 0.06 mm, axial depth of cut ( Ap) = 0.74 mm, cutting speed ( Vc) = 145.8 m/min, and radial depth of cut ( Ae) = 0.38 mm. The optimum value of surface roughness at the optimum parametric setting is 1.11 µm and has been validated by confirmation experiments.

17 April 2023 in Journal of Molecular Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NCNeetu Chaudhary
Neetu Chaudhary
MDMithilesh K. Dikshit
Mithilesh K. Dikshit

3 April 2017 in Machining Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMithilesh K. Dikshit
Mithilesh K. Dikshit
APAsit B. Puri
Asit B. Puri
AMAtanu Maity
Atanu Maity