Sung-Moon Jeong

Prof. Sung-Moon Jeong

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2018 in Pain Research and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDoo-Hwan Kim
Doo-Hwan Kim
SKSooyoung Kim
Sooyoung Kim
CKChan-Sik Kim
Chan-Sik Kim
SLSukyung Lee
Sukyung Lee
ILIn-Gyu Lee
In-Gyu Lee
KCKyu Taek Choi
Kyu Taek Choi
Objectives. The pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II block) is widely used for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery. This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy of PECS II block in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB). Methods. Patients were randomized to the control group (n=40) and the PECS II group (n=40). An ultrasound-guided PECS II block was performed after induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome measure was opioid consumption, and the secondary outcome was pain at the breast and axillary measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 24 hours after surgery. Opioid requirement was assessed according to tumor location. Results. Opioid requirement was lower in the PECS II than in the control group (43.8 ± 28.5 µg versus 77.0 ± 41.9 µg, p<0.001). However, the frequency of rescue analgesics did not differ between these groups. Opioid consumption in the PECS II group was significantly lower in patients with tumors in the outer area than that in patients with tumors in the inner area (32.5 ± 23.0 µg versus 58.0 ± 29.3 µg, p=0.007). The axillary NRS was consistently lower through 24 hr in the PECS II group. Conclusion. Although the PECS II block seemed to reduce pain intensity and opioid requirements for 24 h after BCS and SNB, these reductions may not be clinically significant. This trial is registered with Clinical Research Information Service KCT0002509.

1 January 2015 in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSung-Moon Jeong
Sung-Moon Jeong
Jeong SM. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec;68(6):527-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.527

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHye-Won Jeong
Hye-Won Jeong
CKChan-Sik Kim
Chan-Sik Kim
KCKyu Taek Choi
Kyu Taek Choi
SJSung-Moon Jeong
Sung-Moon Jeong
DKDoo-Hwan Kim
Doo-Hwan Kim
JLJong-Hyuk Lee
Jong-Hyuk Lee
Background: Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is multifactorial and usually not effectively treated. Rectus sheath block (RSB) has been proven to reduce the pain from midline abdominal incision and laparoscopic surgery. We investigated the preemptive analgesic effect of RSB after LC. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-center trial, 200 patients undergoing LC were randomized into preoperative RSB (pre-RSB) or postoperative RSB (post-RSB) group. An ultrasound-guided RSB was performed before skin incision in the pre-RSB group or after skin closure in the post-RSB group. The primary outcome was total rescue analgesic consumption at 24 h post-surgery. The secondary outcomes were cumulated rescue analgesic consumption and postoperative pain measured by numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 1, 2, 6, 9, 18, and 24 h post-surgery. Results: Total rescue analgesic consumption at 24 h post-surgery was significantly lower in the pre-RSB group than in the post-RSB group (p = 0.020). The cumulated rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the pre-RSB group than in the post-RSB group at 1 h (p = 0.023), 9 h (p = 0.020) and 18 h (p = 0.002) post-surgery. NRS was significantly lower in the pre-RSB group than in the post-RSB group at 0 h post-surgery (p = 0.023). Conclusion: The pre-RSB reduced the analgesic requirements in patients undergoing LC compared with the post-RSB.

1 January 2017 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJae Moon Choi
Jae Moon Choi
JJJun-Young Jo
Jun-Young Jo
JBJae-Won Baik
Jae-Won Baik
SKSooyoung Kim
Sooyoung Kim
CKChan-Sik Kim
Chan-Sik Kim
SJSung-Moon Jeong
Sung-Moon Jeong
Preservation of adequate perfusion pressures to the graft is a main focus of intraoperative management during kidney transplantation. We undertook this study to investigate the incidence of the higher use of inotropes in kidney transplant recipients and identify the patient outcomes and preoperative and intraoperative variables related to this. We retrospectively analyzed 1053 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at Asan Medical Center between January 2006 and February 2012, stratified by their inotropic score ([dopamine] + [dobutamine] + [epinephrine × 100] + [norepinephrine × 100]) <7 versus ≥7, wherein all doses are expressed as μg/kg/min. We evaluated preoperative characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and intraoperative variables as well as postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay and 1-year rejection and mortality rate. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine inotropic score to predict 1-year mortality. An inotropic score of 7 had the best combined sensitivity and specificity. An inotropic score ≥7 (137 patients, 13.0%) was significantly more prevalent in older patients, those with polycystic kidney disease, and at a 2nd transplant. Anesthesia time, the amounts of crystalloid and 5% albumin infused, and the need for red blood cell transfusion were significantly higher in the inotropic score ≥7 group. The patients with a higher use of inotropes required longer postoperative hospital stay and experienced a >2-fold higher rejection within the 1st year and a 4-fold higher 1-year mortality rate. A higher use of inotropes in kidney transplant recipients is more prevalent in older patients, those with a 2nd transplant and in patients with polycystic kidney disease as their primary renal disease. The postoperative hospital stay, rejection within the 1st year, and 1-year mortality rate are increased in patients with an inotropic score ≥7.

1 June 2023 in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJong-Hyuk Lee
Jong-Hyuk Lee
CKChan-Sik Kim
Chan-Sik Kim
HKHyungtae Kim
Hyungtae Kim
JCJae Moon Choi
Jae Moon Choi
YKYoungmu Kim
Youngmu Kim
SCSeong-Soo Choi
Seong-Soo Choi
Background: The preemptive visceral analgesic effect of regional nerve block has not been adequately investigated to date. We evaluated the preemptive visceral analgesic effect of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in whom pre-incisional rectus sheath block (RSB) was used to minimize somatic surgical pain.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, assessor-blind study, 70 patients scheduled for elective LC were randomly assigned to the pre-TPVB (n = 35) or the post-TPVB (n = 35) group. Both groups received pre-incisional RSB, and patients in the pre-TPVB group received TPVB before skin incision while those in the post-TPVB group received TPVB after skin closure. The primary outcome was the total rescue analgesic consumption (morphine equianalgesic dose) during the 24 h post-surgery. The secondary outcomes were the cumulative analgesic consumption and pain intensity for 24 h after surgery, and adverse events.Results: Pre-TPVB significantly reduced total rescue analgesic consumption (estimated mean [95% CI]) during the 24 h after surgery than post-TPVB (16.9 [14.5, 19.3] vs. 25.3 [22.8, 27.7] mg, estimated difference: -8.3 [-11.8, -4.9], P < 0.001). The cumulative rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the pre-TPVB group from 2–24 h after surgery (P < 0.001). The postoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in the pre-TPVB group as well at 0.5–6 h after surgery. There were no adverse events in both groups.Conclusions: Pre-incisional TPVB conferred a significant preemptive visceral analgesic effect in patients undergoing LC, and significantly reduced the amount of postoperative opioid consumption.

18 November 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYeon-Ju Kim
Yeon-Ju Kim
DLDo-Kyeong Lee
Do-Kyeong Lee
HKHyun-Jung Kwon
Hyun-Jung Kwon
HKHye-Mee Kwon
Hye-Mee Kwon
JLJong-Hyuk Lee
Jong-Hyuk Lee
SJSung-Moon Jeong
Sung-Moon Jeong
Although recent evidence shows that the programmed intermittent epidural bolus can provide improved analgesia compared to continuous epidural infusion during labor, its usefulness in major upper abdominal surgery remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion on the consumption of postoperative rescue opioids, pain intensity, and consumption of local anesthetic by retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery under ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural analgesia between July 2018 and October 2020. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption up to 72 h after surgery. The data of postoperative pain scores, epidural local anesthetic consumption, and adverse events from 193 patients were analyzed (continuous epidural infusion: n = 124, programmed intermittent epidural bolus: n = 69). There was no significant difference in the rescue opioid consumption in the 72 h postoperative period between the groups (33.3 mg [20.0–43.3] vs. 28.3 mg [18.3–43.3], p = 0.375). There were also no significant differences in the pain scores, epidural local anesthetic consumption, and incidence of adverse events. Our findings suggest that the quality of postoperative analgesia and safety following major upper abdominal surgery were comparable between the groups. However, the use of programmed intermittent epidural bolus requires further evaluation.