Purpose: To study the correlation of serum vitamin D levels with quantitative (central subfield thickness [CST], cube average thickness [CAT]), cross-sectional (disorganisation of retinal inner layer [DRIL] and ellipsoid zone [EZ]) and topographic parameters (retinal pigment epithelium [RPE]) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in diabetic retinopathy (DR), for the first time. Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus with no retinopathy (No DR; n = 22); non-proliferative DR (NPDR; n = 22); proliferative DR (PDR; n = 22) and healthy controls (n = 22) were included, after sample size calculation. On SD-OCT, physician-friendly grading systems were created for DRIL, EZ disruption and RPE alterations. Serum vitamin D was analysed using a standard protocol. Statistical analysis was done using Pearson correlation, Student’s t-test, ANOVA, Newman–Keuls test, chi-square test and univariate ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results: Mean serum vitamin D levels (ng/ml) were: No DR = 23.36 ± 2.00, NPDR = 17.88 ± 1.86, PDR = 14.07 ± 1.21, and controls = 25.11 ± 1.59. Low vitamin D levels correlated significantly with severity of retinopathy, VA (r = 0.50), CST (r = 0.36), CAT (r = 0.41), DRIL (r = 0.35), EZ disruption (r = 0.40) and RPE alterations (r = 0.37), respectively (p < 0.01). Significantly low vitamin D levels were observed in subjects with DRIL present versus DRIL absent; EZ disruption, focal versus global versus intact; RPE alterations, focal versus global versus none, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Low serum vitamin D levels correlate with the presence of DRIL, EZ disruption and RPE alterations and increased severity of DR.

Since 2020, the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) has quickly become a worldwide health problem. Ophthalmologists must deal with symptoms as well. For the positive detection in the conjunctival sac swab in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Slovakia during March 2021 in four hospital centers, we used a test based on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In a group of 484 patients, 264 males (55%) and 220 females (45%) with clinical symptoms were identified with COVID-19 as a clinical diagnosis. The PCR test swab results from the conjunctival sac taken on the same day were positive in 58 patients (12%), 31 males (with a mean age of 74.6 ± 13.59 years) and 27 females (with a mean age of 70.63 ± 14.17 years); negative in 417 patients (86%); and 9 patients (2%) had an unclear result. The cycle threshold values comparing the nasopharynx and conjunctiva were also different in the group of all patients divided by age and gender. In COVID-19 patients the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was detectable using PCR test in the nasopharynx but also in the conjunctival sac swab, where the positivity rate was only 12%.

Background: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the positivity of conjunctival sac swab by PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) test in COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Inclusion criteria of our study were COVID-19 patients hospitalized during March 2021 in inpatient wards at University Hospitals in towns Bratislava and Zilina, Slovakia. The conjunctival sac swabs collected by four ophthalmologists were stored for 24 h, then analyzed in the laboratory of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University, Slovakia. The sampling apparatus, used for conjunctival sac swab, was the Dacron polyester swab. Results: We examined one group of 302 COVID-19 patients, 168 Male (56%) and 134 Female (44%). The patients’ mean age was 66.3 ± 13.66 years, ranging from 25 to 96 years, and the mean length of hospital stay in our patients with a nasopharyngeal positive PCR test was 7.33 ± 4.76, from 2 to 24 days. The PCR tests from the conjunctival sac swabs were positive in 33 patients (11%), negative in 259 patients (86%), and ten patients (3%) were with the unclear result. In the group of 33 positive patients were 17 males with a mean age of 74.6 ± 13.59 years and 16 females with a mean age of 70.63 ± 14.17 years. The cycle threshold (C_T) values differed significantly between conjunctival sac swabs from the nasopharynx and the conjunctiva. Medians of the values were 25.1 (14.1, 32.1) and 31.5 (22.6, 36.6) (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: This study affirmed that in COVID-19 patients the SARS-CoV-2 was detectable with PCR test in conjunctival sac swab, but the positivity rate was only about one to ten cases (11%).

Purpose: To report the visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with age‐related cataracts. Methods: This prospective, noncomparative, multicenter study assessed 126 patients undergoing cataract extraction followed by AT ELANA 841P IOL implantation. At 4–6 months postoperatively, refractive error and predictability, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance‐corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), distance‐corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and binocular contrast sensitivity were measured. The binocular defocus curve was evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. Results: Postoperatively, most of the eyes (84.9%) were within ±0.5 D of spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and almost all eyes (98.9%) within ±1.0 D, with a mean SE value of −0.11 ± 0.37 D. Mean monocular CDVA was −0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR and UDVA was −0.01 ± 0.10 logMAR. Mean monocular uncorrected (UIVA and UNVA) and distance‐corrected visual acuities (DCIVA and DCNVA) were 0.1 logMAR or better at intermediate (80 cm) and near (40 cm) distances. In the mean defocus curve, a continuous range of 0.1 logMAR or better vision from distance to near was observed. Percentages of eyes achieving CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA of 0.1 logMAR or better were 97.2%, 59.1% and 59.1%, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better was achieved in 88.9% of the eyes at far, 57.1% at intermediate, and 44.4% at near distances. Contrast sensitivity was in the normal range of a phakic population at all spatial frequencies in all light conditions tested, photopic with glare and mesopic with and without glare. Conclusion: Implantation of the new AT ELANA 841P IOL following cataract extraction is safe and effective. Visual acuities at all distances, refractive outcomes, and contrast sensitivity were favorable at 4–6 months postoperatively, providing patients with satisfactory far, intermediate, and near vision. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06247683

Background: The aim was to study the association of serum total calcium, ionic calcium, and magnesium with increases in macular thickness parameters and photoreceptor ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This study is a tertiary care center based observational cross-sectional study with sixty-six consecutive cases, divided into 3 groups of 22 cases each with no diabetic retinopathy (No DR), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and a control group of 22 healthy controls. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured on logMAR scale. Central subfield thickness (CST), cube average thickness (CAT), and EZ disruption were assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Serum total calcium, ionic calcium, and magnesium were measured using standard protocol. Data was analyzed statistically. Results: Significant correlation was found between the increase in CST and the increase in serum total calcium and serum ionic calcium. Increase in CAT was significantly correlated with an increase in serum total calcium, serum ionic calcium, and a decrease in serum magnesium. Grades of EZ disruption and logMAR BCVA were also found to be significantly positively associated with serum total calcium and ionic calcium and negatively with serum magnesium. Conclusions: Increased levels of serum ionic calcium and decreased levels of serum magnesium are associated with an increase in macular thickness and EZ disruption in DME.