Eric Voog

Eric Voog


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stephane OudardStephane Oudard
Stephane Oudard
SCStéphane Culine
Stéphane Culine
YVYann VANO
Yann VANO
FGFrançois Goldwasser
François Goldwasser
CTChristine Théodore
Christine Théodore
PBPhilippe Beuzeboc
Philippe Beuzeboc

24 March 2021 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TFThierry Facon
Thierry Facon
CVChristopher P. Venner
Christopher P. Venner
NBNizar J. Bahlis
Nizar J. Bahlis
FOFritz Offner
Fritz Offner
DWDarrell J. White
Darrell J. White
SRS. Vincent Rajkumar
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is suitable for continuous dosing, with predictable, manageable toxicities. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM2 trial transplant-ineligible NDMM patients were randomized to ixazomib 4 mg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 354) plus Rd. After 18 cycles, dexamethasone was discontinued; treatment continued using reduced-dose ixazomib (3 mg) and lenalidomide (10 mg) until progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS (mPFS) was 35.3 vs 21.8 months with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.830; 95% confidence interval, 0.676-1.018; P = .073; median follow-up, 53.3 and 55.8 months). Complete (26% vs 14%; odds ratio [OR], 2.10; P < .001) and ≥ very good partial response (63% vs 48%; OR, 1.87; P < .001) rates were higher with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd. In a prespecified high-risk cytogenetics subgroup, mPFS was 23.8 vs 18.0 months (HR, 0.690; P = .019). Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1/2. With ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, 88% vs 81% of patients experienced grade ≥3 TEAEs, 66% vs 62% serious TEAEs, and 35% vs 27% TEAEs resulting in regimen discontinuation; 8% vs 6% died on study. Ixazomib-Rd is a feasible option for certain patients who can benefit from an all-oral triplet combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01850524).

29 July 2017 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EVEric Voog
Eric Voog
Loic CampionLoic Campion
Loic Campion
PRPAULINE DU RUSQUEC
PAULINE DU RUSQUEC
HBHugues Bourgeois
Hugues Bourgeois
JDJulien Domont
Julien Domont
PSPhilippe Solal-Celigny
Philippe Solal-Celigny

1 August 2019 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEric Voog
Eric Voog
BCBoris Campillo‐Gimenez
Boris Campillo‐Gimenez
CEClaude Elkouri
Claude Elkouri
FPFranck Priou
Franck Priou
FRFrederic Rolland
Frederic Rolland
FGFrancoise Grudé
Francoise Grudé

24 September 2004
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCatherine Lhommé
Catherine Lhommé
IRIsabelle Ray-Coquard
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
JGJean-Pierre Guastalla
Jean-Pierre Guastalla
ABAnne Bataillard
Anne Bataillard
LTLaurence Thomas
Laurence Thomas
S(Société Française D'Oncologie Gynécologique (Sfog)
Société Française D'Oncologie Gynécologique (Sfog)