Joni Holmes

Dr. Joni Holmes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 June 2009 in Developmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJoni Holmes
Joni Holmes
SGSusan Gathercole
Susan Gathercole
DDDarren L. Dunning
Darren L. Dunning

1 June 2011 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHannah Darwin
Hannah Darwin
NNNick Neave
Nick Neave
JHJoni Holmes
Joni Holmes

22 June 2009 in Applied Cognitive Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJoni Holmes
Joni Holmes
SGSusan E. Gathercole
Susan E. Gathercole
MPMaurice Place
Maurice Place
DDDarren L. Dunning
Darren L. Dunning
KHKerry A. Hilton
Kerry A. Hilton
JEJulian G. Elliott
Julian G. Elliott

1 April 2019 in Journal of Memory and Language
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGSusan Gathercole
Susan Gathercole
DDDarren Dunning
Darren Dunning
JHJoni Holmes
Joni Holmes
DNDennis Norris
Dennis Norris
We present a new framework characterizing training-induced changes in WM as the acquisition of novel cognitive routines akin to learning a new skill. Predictions were tested in three studies analyzing the transfer between WM tasks following WM training. Study 1 reports a meta-analysis establishing substantial transfer when trained and untrained tasks shared either a serial recall, complex span or backward span paradigm. Transfer was weaker for serial recall of verbal than visuo-spatial material, suggesting that this paradigm is served by an existing verbal STM system and does not require a new routine. Re-analysis of published WM training data in Study 2 showed that transfer was restricted to tasks sharing properties proposed to require new routines. In a re-analysis of data from four studies, Study 3 demonstrated that transfer was greatest for children with higher fluid cognitive abilities. These findings suggest that development of new routines depends on general cognitive resources and that they can only be applied to other similarly-structured tasks.

1 June 2006 in Educational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJoni Holmes
Joni Holmes
JAJohn W. Adams
John W. Adams
This study examined the contributions of the different components of the working memory (WM) model to a range of mathematical skills in children, using measures of WM function that did not involve numerical stimuli. A sample of 148 children (78 Year 3, mean age 8 years and 1 month, and 70 Year 5 pupils, mean age 9 years and 10 months) completed WM measures and age‐appropriate mathematics tests designed to assess four mathematical skills defined by the National Curriculum for England. Visuo‐spatial sketchpad and central executive, but not phonological loop, scores predicted unique variance in children’s curriculum‐based mathematical attainment but the relative contributions of each component did not vary much across the different skills. Subsequently, the mathematics data were re‐analysed using cluster analysis and new performance‐related mathematics factors were derived. All three components of WM predicted unique variance in these performance‐related skills, but revealed a markedly distinct pattern of associations across the two age groups. In particular, the data indicated a stronger role for the visuo‐spatial sketchpad in the younger children’s mathematics performance. We discuss our findings in terms of the importance of WM in the development of early mathematical ability.

8 July 2013 in Developmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DDDarren L. Dunning
Darren L. Dunning
JHJoni Holmes
Joni Holmes
SGSusan Gathercole
Susan Gathercole
Children with low working memory typically make poor educational progress, and it has been speculated that difficulties in meeting the heavy working memory demands of the classroom may be a contributory factor. Intensive working memory training has been shown to boost performance on untrained memory tasks in a variety of populations. This first randomized controlled trial with low working memory children investigated whether the benefits of training extend beyond standard working memory tasks to other more complex activities typical of the classroom in which working memory plays a role, as well as to other cognitive skills and developing academic abilities. Children aged 7–9 years received either adaptive working memory training, non‐adaptive working memory training with low memory loads, or no training. Adaptive training was associated with selective improvements in multiple untrained tests of working memory, with no evidence of changes in classroom analogues of activities that tax working memory, or any other cognitive assessments. Gains in verbal working memory were sustained one year after training. Thus the benefits of working memory training delivered in this way may not extend beyond structured working memory tasks.