Peter E Lipsky

Dr. Peter E Lipsky

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2021 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPengchong Li
Pengchong Li
MJMengdi Jiang
Mengdi Jiang
KLKetian Li
Ketian Li
HLHao Li
Hao Li
YZYangzhong Zhou
Yangzhong Zhou
XZXuan Zhang
Xuan Zhang

3 September 2020 in Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDavid S. Pisetsky
David S. Pisetsky
PLPeter E Lipsky
Peter E Lipsky

27 October 2011 in Arthritis Research & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDThomas Dörner
Thomas Dörner
CGClaudia Giesecke
Claudia Giesecke
PLPeter E Lipsky
Peter E Lipsky
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that is known to be associated with polyclonal B-cell hyperreactivity. The underlying causes of the diffuse B-cell over-reactivity are unclear, but potential candidates include (a) intrinsic hyper-reactivity leading to polyclonal B-cell activation with disturbed activation thresholds and ineffective negative selection; (b) lack of immunoregulatory functions; (c) secondary effects of an overactive inflammatory environment, such as overactive germinal center and ectopic follicular activity; and/or (d) disturbed cytokine production by non-B immune cells. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may operate to varying extents and at varying times in SLE. Phenotypic and molecular studies as well as the results of recent clinical trials have begun to provide new insights to address these possibilities. Of importance, new information has made it possible to distinguish between the contribution played by abnormalities in central checkpoints that could lead to a pre-immune repertoire enriched in autoreactive B cells, on the one hand, and the possibility that autoimmunity arises in the periphery from somatic hypermutation and abnormal selection during T cell-dependent B-cell responses on the other. There is an intriguing possibility that apoptotic material bound to the surface of follicular dendritic cells positively selects autoreactive B cells that arise from non-autoreactive B-cell precursors as a result of somatic hypermutation and thereby promotes the peripheral emergence of autoimmunity.

4 March 2014 in Arthritis Research & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPeter E Lipsky
Peter E Lipsky
LCLeonard H Calabrese
Leonard H Calabrese
AKArthur Kavanaugh
Arthur Kavanaugh
JSJohn S Sundy
John S Sundy
DWDavid Wright
David Wright
MBMichael A Becker
Michael A Becker
Introduction: The efficacy of pegloticase, a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated mammalian recombinant uricase, approved for chronic refractory gout, can be limited by the development of antibodies (Ab). Analyses from 2 replicate, 6-month, randomized controlled trials were performed to characterize Ab responses to pegloticase. Methods: Anti-pegloticase, anti-PEG, and anti-uricase Ab were determined by validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Ab titers were analyzed for possible relationships with serum pegloticase concentrations, serum uric acid (sUA) lowering, and risk of infusion reactions (IRs). Results: Sixty-nine (41%) of 169 patients receiving pegloticase developed high titer anti-pegloticase Ab (> 1:2430) and 40% (67/169) developed anti-PEG Ab; 1 patient receiving placebo developed high titer anti-pegloticase Ab. Only 14% (24/169) of patients developed anti-uricase Ab, usually at low titer. In responders, patients showing sustained UA lowering, mean anti-pegloticase titers at week 25 (1:837 ± 1687 with biweekly and 1:2025 ± 4506 with monthly dosing) were markedly lower than in nonresponders (1:34,528 ± 42,228 and 1:89,658 ± 297,797, respectively). Nonresponder status was associated with reduced serum pegloticase concentrations. Baseline anti-pegloticase Ab, evident in 15% (31/212) of patients, did not predict subsequent loss of urate-lowering response. Loss of sUA response preceded IRs in 44 of 56 (79%) pegloticase-treated patients. Conclusions: Loss of responsiveness to pegloticase is associated with the development of high titer anti-pegloticase Ab that increase clearance of pegloticase and are associated with a loss of the sUA lowering effect and increased IR risk. Pre-infusion sUA can be used as a surrogate for the presence of deleterious anti-pegloticase Ab. Trial registration: NCT00325195. Registered 10 May 2006, NCT01356498. Registered 27 October 2008.

17 August 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXunyao Wu
Xunyao Wu
YLYi Liu
Yi Liu
SJShanzhao Jin
Shanzhao Jin
MWMin Wang
Min Wang
YJYuhao Jiao
Yuhao Jiao
XZXuan Zhang
Xuan Zhang
The presence or absence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) and associated disparities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) implies disease heterogeneity with unknown diverse immunopathological mechanisms. Here we profile CD45+ hematopoietic cells from peripheral blood or synovial tissues from both ACPA+ and ACPA- RA patients by single-cell RNA sequencing and identify subsets of immune cells that contribute to the pathogenesis of RA subtypes. We find several synovial immune cell abnormalities, including up-regulation of CCL13, CCL18 and MMP3 in myeloid cell subsets of ACPA- RA compared with ACPA+ RA. Also evident is a lack of HLA-DRB5 expression and lower expression of cytotoxic and exhaustion related genes in the synovial tissues of patients with ACPA- RA. Furthermore, the HLA-DR15 haplotype (DRB1/DRB5) conveys an increased risk of developing active disease in ACPA+ RA in a large cohort of patients with treatment-naive RA. Immunohistochemical staining shows increased infiltration of CCL13 and CCL18-expressing immune cells in synovial tissues of ACPA- RA. Collectively, our data provide evidence of the differential involvement of cellular and molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of seropositive and seronegative RA subtypes and reveal the importance of precision therapy based on ACPA status.

1 June 2015 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QLQian-Wen Lv
Qian-Wen Lv
WZWen Zhang
Wen Zhang
QSQun Shi
Qun Shi
WZWen-Jie Zheng
Wen-Jie Zheng
XLXin Li
Xin Li
XZXuan Zhang
Xuan Zhang
Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Design: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. All patients were assessed by trained investigators who were unaware of the therapeutic regimen. Intervention: 207 patients with active RA were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to treatment with MTX 12.5 mg once a week, or TwHF 20 mg three times a day, or the two in combination. At week 12, if reduction of the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was <30% in the monotherapy groups, the patient was switched to MTX+TwHF. The primary efficacy point was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response at week 24. Results 174/207 (84.1%) patients completed 24 weeks of the trial. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of patients reaching the ACR50 response criteria was 46.4% (32/69), 55.1% (38/69) and 76.8% (53/69), respectively, in the MTX, TwHF and MTX+TwHF groups (TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p=0.014; MTX+TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p<0.001). Similar statistically significant patterns at week 24 were found for ACR20, ACR70, clinical Disease Activity Index good responses, EULAR good response, remission rate and low disease activity rate. Significant improvement in the Health Assessment Questionnaire and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire scores from baseline to week 24 was seen in each treatment arm (p0.05). The result of per-protocol analysis agreed with that seen in the intention-to-treat analysis. Seven, three and five women in the TwHF, MTX and combination groups, respectively, developed irregular menstruation (TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p=0.216). Conclusions TwHF monotherapy was not inferior to, and MTX+TwHF was better than, MTX monotherapy in controlling disease activity in patients with active RA. Trial registration number NCT01613079.