Willy Bernal Heredia

Mr. Willy Bernal Heredia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2022 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDaniel Gerber
Daniel Gerber
OGOmkar Ghatpande
Omkar Ghatpande
MNMoazzam Nazir
Moazzam Nazir
WHWilly Bernal Heredia
Willy Bernal Heredia
WFWei Feng
Wei Feng
RBRichard E. Brown
Richard E. Brown

21 January 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VVVagelis Vossos
Vagelis Vossos
DGDaniel Gerber
Daniel Gerber
MGMelanie Gaillet-Tournier
Melanie Gaillet-Tournier
BNBruce Nordman
Bruce Nordman
RBRichard Brown
Richard Brown
SFStephen Frank
Stephen Frank
Driven by the proliferation of DC energy sources and DC end-use devices (e.g., photovoltaics, battery storage, solid-state lighting, and consumer electronics), DC power distribution in buildings has recently emerged as a path to improved efficiency, resilience, and cost savings in the transitioning building sector. Despite these important benefits, there are several technological and market barriers impeding the development of DC distribution, which have kept this technology at the demonstration phase. This paper identifies specific end-use cases for which DC distribution in buildings is viable today. We evaluate their technology and market readiness, as well as their efficiency, cost, and resiliency benefits while addressing implementation barriers. The paper starts with a technology review, followed by a comprehensive market assessment, in which we analyze DC distribution field deployments and their end-use characteristics. We also conduct a survey of DC power and building professionals through on-site visits and phone interviews and summarize lessons learned and recommendations. In addition, the paper includes a novel efficiency analysis, in which we quantify energy savings from DC distribution for different end-use categories. Based on our findings, we present specific adoption pathways for DC in buildings that can be implemented today, and for each pathway we identify challenges and offer recommendations for the research and building community.

25 December 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMoazzam Nazir
Moazzam Nazir
OGOmkar Ghatpande
Omkar Ghatpande
WHWilly Bernal Heredia
Willy Bernal Heredia
CWCameron Wierzbanowski
Cameron Wierzbanowski
DGDaniel Gerber
Daniel Gerber
ASAvijit Saha
Avijit Saha
Building-level electrical distribution systems comprise a myriad of current-carrying equipment, conversion devices, and protection devices that deliver power from the utility or local distributed energy resources to end-use building loads. Electric power has traditionally been generated, transmitted, and distributed in alternating current (AC). However, the last decade has seen a significant increase in the integration of native direct current (DC) equipment that has elevated the importance of DC distribution systems. Numerous studies have comparatively examined the performance of various electrical distribution systems in buildings but have failed to achieve uniform conclusions, primarily because of a lack of consistent and analogous performance evaluation methods. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a standard set of metrics and measurement boundaries to consistently evaluate the performance of AC, DC, or hybrid AC/DC electrical distribution systems. The efficacy of the proposed approach is evaluated on a representative medium-sized commercial office building model with AC distribution and an equivalent hybrid AC/DC and DC distribution model, wherein the AC distribution model is concluded to be the most efficient. The simulation results show variation in computed metrics with different selected boundaries that verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach in ensuring consistent computation of the performance of building-level electrical distribution systems. This paper provides an initial set of guidelines for building energy system stakeholders to adopt appropriate solutions, thus leading to more efficient energy systems.

1 September 2016
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
FKFeitau Kung
Feitau Kung
SFStephen Frank
Stephen Frank
JSJennifer Scheib
Jennifer Scheib
WHWilly Bernal Heredia
Willy Bernal Heredia
SPShanti Pless
Shanti Pless
A zero energy building (ZEB)—also known as a net zero energy or zero net energy building—is a building that exports as much renewable energy as the total energy it imports from other sources on an annual basis (DOE 2015). Large-scale and commercially viable ZEBs are now in the marketplace, and they are expected to become a larger share of the commercial building footprint as government and private sector policies continue to promote the development of buildings that produce more on-site energy than they use. However, the load profiles of ZEBs are currently perceived by electric utilities to be unfavorable and unpredictable. As shown in Figure ES-1, ZEB load profiles can have abrupt changes in magnitude, at times switching rapidly between exporting and importing electricity. This is a challenge for utilities, which are responsible for constantly balancing electricity supply and demand across the grid. Addressing these concerns will require new strategies and tools.

1 July 2021
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
WHWilly Bernal Heredia
Willy Bernal Heredia
DCDylan S Cutler
Dylan S Cutler
JDJesse D Dean
Jesse D Dean
Laboratory and field demonstration of circuit-level electrical submetering technology that utilizes wireless current transformers to monitor circuits within the panel. Report provides a background of the technology and how it works, outlines the testing methodology and presents results on measurement accuracy and ability of the technology to be rapidly integrated into both electrical panels/infrastructure and into an analytics platform. Cost effectiveness results are discussed for the specific field demonstration site.

13 January 2021
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
WHWilly Bernal Heredia
Willy Bernal Heredia
DCDylan Cutler
Dylan Cutler
JDJesse Dean
Jesse Dean
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information