Background: Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) is relatively uncommon. It is unclear if the incidence of EOPC is evolving and how these patients are treated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study using SEER 2004–2016. We evaluated annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAIR), stage at presentation, and race/ethnicity among 7802 patients plus treatment patterns in 7307 patients (excluding neuroendocrine tumors) younger than 50. Results: The AAIR was higher in males while the rate increased faster in females. The AAIR was highest in Non-Hispanic Black patients and increased for all races/ethnicities over time. The percentage of patients diagnosed with distant-stage disease decreased over time but increased for localized-stage disease. Hispanic patients made up a larger proportion of patients over time compared to other groups. For localized-stage disease, primary surgery alone was the most utilized modality of therapy. For regional-stage disease, chemotherapy with radiation was the most utilized modality from 2004–2010, whereas chemotherapy alone was the most utilized from 2011–2016. For distant-stage disease, chemotherapy alone was the most utilized and used increasingly over time. Patients with EOPC received radiation and chemotherapy at similar rates to, and underwent surgery more frequently, than patients 50–69. Conclusions: The AAIR of EOPC increased over time, faster so in females. Groups who experience a higher burden of pancreatic cancer, particularly African Americans, experienced a higher burden of EOPC. Treatment of localized and regional-stage disease did not follow standard treatment guidelines for pancreatic cancer. Our findings indicate that EOPC patients received more treatment than their older counterparts.

The microbiome is pivotal in maintaining health and influencing disease by modulating essential inflammatory and immune responses. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ranking as the third most common cause of cancer-related fatalities globally, is influenced by the gut microbiome through bidirectional interactions between the gut and liver, as evidenced in both mouse models and human studies. Consequently, biomarkers based on gut microbiota represent promising non-invasive tools for the early detection of HCC. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the composition of the gut microbiota may play a role in the efficacy of immunotherapy in different types of cancer; thus, it could be used as a predictive biomarker. In this review, we will dissect the gut microbiome’s role as a potential predictive and diagnostic marker in HCC and evaluate the latest progress in leveraging the gut microbiome as a novel therapeutic avenue for HCC patients, with a special emphasis on immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can induce pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with localized deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. The long-term outcomes of these patients are unknown, as is the clinical utility of measuring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Follow-up was evaluated in patients enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT04082572) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H tumors. The primary outcomes of this trial have previously been reported. 3-year EFS and OS rates were 80% (95% CI: 66% – 93%) and 94% (95% CI: 86% – 100%). Patients without detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab had higher 3-year EFS and OS rates than patients with detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab (3-year EFS 92% vs 20%; p < 0.001, 3-year OS 100% vs 80%; p < 0.001). Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who had undetectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab were more likely to have pCR compared to those with detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab (91% vs 0%; p = 0.03). Patients with CRC who were managed non-operatively and had undetectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab had a higher 2-year EFS rate than patients with detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab (100% vs 33%; p = 0.03). Pembrolizumab demonstrates long-term efficacy in patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H tumors.

The burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to pose a significant global health problem. Several systemic therapies have recently been shown to improve survival for patients with unresectable disease. However, evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapies in patients with resectable disease is limited, despite the high risk of recurrence. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapies are being investigated for their potential to reduce recurrence after resection and improve overall survival. Our review identified various early-phase clinical trials showing impressive preliminary signals of pathologic complete response in resectable disease, and others suggesting that neoadjuvant therapies—particularly when combined with adjuvant strategies—may convert unresectable disease to resectable disease and cause significant tumor necrosis, potentially decreasing recurrence rates. The role of adjuvant therapies alone may also play a part in the management of these patients, particularly in reducing recurrence rates. Heterogeneity in trial design, therapies used, patient selection, and a scarcity of randomized phase III trials necessitate the cautious implementation of these treatment strategies. Future research is required to identify predictive biomarkers, optimize the timing and type of therapeutic combinations, and minimize treatment-related adverse effects, thereby personalizing and enhancing treatment strategies for patients with resectable and borderline resectable HCC.

Background: Early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC), or gastric cancer in patients younger than 45 years old, is poorly understood and relatively uncommon. Similar to other gastrointestinal malignancies, the incidence of EOGC is rising in Western countries. It is unclear which populations experience a disproportionate burden of EOGC and what factors influence how patients with EOGC are treated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from 2004 to 2018 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). In addition to identifying unique demographic characteristics of patients with EOGC, we evaluated (using multivariable logistic regression controlling for year of diagnoses, primary site, and stage) how gender/sex, race/ethnicity, treatment facility type, payor status, and location of residence influenced the receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Results: Compared to patients 45–70 and >70 years of age with gastric cancer, patients with EOGC were more likely to be female, Asian/Pacific Islander (PI), African American (AA), Hispanic, uninsured, and present with stage IV disease. On multivariable analysis, several differences among subsets of patients with EOGC were identified. Female patients with EOGC were less likely to receive surgery and chemotherapy than male patients with EOGC. Asian/Pacific Islander patients with EOGC were more likely to receive chemotherapy and less likely to receive radiation than Caucasian patients with EOGC. African American patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy than Caucasian patients with EOGC. Hispanic patients were more likely to receive surgery and chemotherapy and less likely to receive radiation than Caucasian patients with EOGC. Patients with EOGC treated at community cancer centers were more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy than patients with EOGC treated at academic centers. Uninsured patients with EOGC were more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy than privately insured patients with EOGC. Patients with EOGC living in locations not adjacent to metropolitan areas were less likely to receive surgery compared to patients with EOGC who resided in metropolitan areas, Conclusions: Patients with EOGC are a demographically distinct population. Treatment of these patients varies significantly based on several demographic factors. Additional analysis is needed to elucidate why particular groups are more affected by EOGC and how treatment decisions are made for, and by, these patients.

Background: Trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for refractory unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The recommended dose is 35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of 28-day cycles commonly resulting in grade 3-4 neutropenia, dose delays/reductions, and requiring GCSF support. To maintain efficacy and reduce toxicity, we analyzed a biweekly dosing schedule (days 1-5 and days 15-19 q28 days). Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients with mCRC and appendiceal cancer who completed >12 days of TAS-102 therapy and underwent surveillance imaging every 8-12 weeks. ECOG performance status (PS), prior lines of therapy, use of bevacizumab, CTCAE grade of treatment-related myelotoxicity, dose reductions/delays, and use of GCSF were assessed. Among patients with mCRC, survival analyses were performed. Results: 61 patients met inclusion criteria, with mCRC:appendiceal CA ratio of 56:5. Median ECOG PS = 1; median number of prior therapies = 3; Reduction in grade ≥3 neutropenia (16.3%, 1 patient with grade 4) and grade ≥3 anemia (8.2%) relative to the historic controls of the RECOURSE and SUNLIGHT trials. No neutropenic fever was noted; GCSF was not required. Eight patients required a dose delay. In the mCRC patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 9.2 months. Conclusions: Biweekly dosing of TAS-102 demonstrated a reduction in myelosuppression, with similar PFS and OS. With an improved toxicity profile, this alternative dosing schedule may potentially broaden the utilization of TAS-102 in patients with borderline PS and provide a favorable option for future combination studies.