Regis Resende Paulinelli

Prof. Regis Resende Paulinelli

Federal Univeristy of Goiás
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2021 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFlorian Fitzal
Florian Fitzal
MBMichael Bolliger
Michael Bolliger
DDDaniela Dunkler
Daniela Dunkler
AGAngelika Geroldinger
Angelika Geroldinger
LGLuca Gambone
Luca Gambone
WWWalter P. Weber
Walter P. Weber
Introduction: Recent data suggest that margins ≥2 mm after breast-conserving surgery may improve local control in invasive breast cancer (BC). By allowing large resection volumes, oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCII; Clough level II/Tübingen 5-6) may achieve better local control than conventional breast conserving surgery (BCS; Tübingen 1-2) or oncoplastic breast conservation with low resection volumes (OBCI; Clough level I/Tübingen 3-4). Methods: Data from consecutive high-risk BC patients treated in 15 centers from the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC) network, between January 2010 and December 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 3,177 women were included, 30% of whom were treated with OBC (OBCI n = 663; OBCII n = 297). The BCS/OBCI group had significantly smaller tumors and smaller resection margins compared with OBCII (pT1: 50% vs. 37%, p = 0.002; proportion with margin <1 mm: 17% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). There were significantly more re-excisions due to R1 (“ink on tumor”) in the BCS/OBCI compared with the OBCII group (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.049). Univariate and multivariable regression analysis adjusted for tumor biology, tumor size, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment demonstrated no differences in local, regional, or distant recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups. Conclusions: Large resection volumes in oncoplastic surgery increases the distance from cancer cells to the margin of the specimen and reduces reexcision rates significantly. With OBCII larger tumors are resected with similar local, regional and distant recurrence-free as well as overall survival rates as BCS/OBCI.

3 December 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMagno Cirqueira
Magno Cirqueira
CMCarolina Rodrigues Mendonça
Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça
Matias NollMatias Noll
Matias Noll
LSLeonardo Ribeiro Soares
Leonardo Ribeiro Soares
MCMaria Auxiliadora de Paula Carneiro Cysneiros
Maria Auxiliadora de Paula Carneiro Cysneiros
RFRuffo Frritas-Junior
Ruffo Frritas-Junior
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been investigated in various types of cancer; however, the role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. A total of 965 articles were included from CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Of these, 22 studies encompassing 6468 cases of invasive breast cancer were included in the systematic review, and 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.26–3.52; p =< 0.000); however, there was no significant improvement in DFS (HR 0.17; 95% CI −0.12–0.46; p =< 0.252). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.

13 August 2014 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RPRegis Resende Paulinelli
Regis Resende Paulinelli
VOVilmar Marques de Oliveira
Vilmar Marques de Oliveira
FBFábio Bagnoli
Fábio Bagnoli
MCMilca Cézar Chade
Milca Cézar Chade
KAKatyane Larissa Alves
Katyane Larissa Alves
RFRuffo Frritas-Junior
Ruffo Frritas-Junior

22 April 2023 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WWWalter P. Weber
Walter P. Weber
Oreste D. GentiliniOreste D. Gentilini
Oreste D. Gentilini
MMMonica Morrow
Monica Morrow
GMGiacomo Montagna
Giacomo Montagna
JBJana de Boniface
Jana de Boniface
Michael GnantMichael Gnant
Michael Gnant
The aims of this Oncoplastic Breast Consortium and European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists initiative were to identify uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of early breast cancer and to recommend appropriate strategies to address them. By use of Delphi methods, 15 questions were prioritized by more than 250 breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists from 60 countries. Subsequently, a global virtual consensus panel considered available data, ongoing studies and resource utilization. It agreed that research should no longer be prioritized for standardization of axillary imaging, de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive cancer and risk evaluation of modern surgery and radiotherapy. Instead, expert consensus recommendations for clinical practice should be based on current evidence and updated once results from ongoing studies become available. Research on de-escalation of radiotherapy and identification of the most relevant endpoints in axillary management should encompass a meta-analysis to identify knowledge gaps, followed by a Delphi process to prioritize and a consensus conference to refine recommendations for specific trial designs. Finally, treatment of residual nodal disease after surgery was recommended to be assessed in a prospective register.

10 February 2011 in The Breast Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RPRegis Resende Paulinelli
Regis Resende Paulinelli
RFRuffo Frritas-Junior
Ruffo Frritas-Junior
CLClécio Ênio Murta de Lucena
Clécio Ênio Murta de Lucena
MMMarise Amaral Rebouças Moreira
Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira
VMVardeli Alves de Moraes
Vardeli Alves de Moraes
DTDanilo Augusto Teixeira
Danilo Augusto Teixeira
To create an individualized predictive tool for the risk of malignancy in solid breast masses, based on echographic and clinical characteristics. Research Ethics Committee approval and informed consent were obtained. This multi-center study included 1,403 solid breast masses prospectively. Each ultrasound feature was analyzed and compared with the definitive diagnosis. The ultrasound results, women's ages and family histories of breast cancer were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Among the 1,403 lesions included in the study, 1,390 (99.1%) had a conclusive diagnosis: 343 malignant tumors (24.7%), and 1,047 benign masses (75.3%). The odds ratio (and confidence interval) for breast malignancy for each variable included in the model, as calculated by multivariate analysis, were as follows: irregular shape/noncircumscribed margins, 16.02 (7.75-33.09); heterogeneous echo texture, 4.50 (2.42-8.23); vertical orientation (not parallel to the skin), 2.23 (1.04-4.75); anterior echogenic rim, 2.62 (1.09-6.31); posterior shadowing, 2.38 (1.23-4.62); age more than 40 years, 2.19 (1.26-3.81); positive first-degree family history (mother, sister or daughter), 7.50 (2.65-21.18). There was no advantage in including the presence of internal vascularity, presence of thickened Cooper's ligaments or size of the mass, in the model. The predictive tool was named SONOBREAST and it is freely available for medical purposes on the internet site: http://www.sonobreast.com. The probability of malignancy in breast masses can be specified based on their ultrasound features, the woman's age and the family history of breast cancer.

1 February 2017 in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRegis Resende Paulinelli
Regis Resende Paulinelli
RFRuffo Frritas-Junior
Ruffo Frritas-Junior
RRRosemar Macedo de Souza Rahal
Rosemar Macedo de Souza Rahal
LOLuis Fernando de Pádua Oliveira
Luis Fernando de Pádua Oliveira
MVMaria Helena Tavares Vilela
Maria Helena Tavares Vilela
TRTatiane Coelho Capel de Resende
Tatiane Coelho Capel de Resende
Summary Introduction: Methylene blue is more widely available and less expensive than patent blue, with an apparently lower risk of anaphylaxis. Objective: The two dyes were compared regarding detection of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Method: A prospective, randomized trial involved 142 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Sixty-nine (49.3%) assigned to patent blue (group A) and 71 (50.70%) to methylene blue (group B). Thirty-five patients (25.0%) were clinical stage III or IV; 55 (38.7%) had axillary lymph nodes affected; and 69 (49.3%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients were excluded because the dye type was not recorded. Results: Patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. SLNs were identified in 47 women (68.1%) in group A and 43 (60.6%) in group B (p=0.35). SLNs were affected in 22 cases (51.2%) in group A and 21 (48.8%) in group B (p=0.62). The SLN was the only node affected in 12 cases (54.5%) in group A and six (33.3%) in group B (p=0.18). The time and degree of difficulty involved in identifying the SLN were similar in both groups. There were no complications or allergies. Conclusion: Methylene blue performed as well as patent blue in identifying the SLN in breast cancer patients.