Background: Depression is a substantial global health problem, affecting >300 million people and resulting in 12.7% of all deaths. Depression causes various physical and cognitive problems, leading to a 5-year to 10-year decrease in life expectancy compared with the general population. Physical activity is known to be an effective, evidence-based treatment for depression. However, people generally have difficulties with participating in physical activity owing to limitations in time and accessibility.Objective: To address this issue, this study aimed to contribute to the development of alternative and innovative intervention methods for depression and stress management in adults. More specifically, we attempted to investigate the effectiveness of a mobile phone–based physical activity program on depression, perceived stress, psychological well-being, and quality of life among adults in South Korea.Methods: Participants were recruited and randomly assigned to the mobile phone intervention or waitlist group. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess variables before and after treatment. The treatment group used the program around 3 times per week at home for 4 weeks, with each session lasting about 30 minutes. To evaluate the program’s impact, a 2 (condition) × 2 (time) repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted, considering pretreatment and posttreatment measures along with group as independent variables. For a more detailed analysis, paired-samples 2-tailed t tests were used to compare pretreatment and posttreatment measurements within each group. Independent-samples 2-tailed t tests were conducted to assess intergroup differences in pretreatment measurements.Results: The study included a total of 68 adults aged between 18 and 65 years, who were recruited both through web-based and offline methods. Of these 68 individuals, 41 (60%) were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 27 (40%) to the waitlist group. The attrition rate was 10.2% after 4 weeks. The findings indicated that there is a significant main effect of time (F1,60=15.63; P=.003; ηp2=0.21) in participants’ depression scores, indicating that there were changes in depression level across time. No significant changes were observed in perceived stress (P=.25), psychological well-being (P=.35), or quality of life (P=.07). Furthermore, depression scores significantly decreased in the treatment group (from 7.08 to 4.64; P=.03; Cohen d=0.50) but not in the waitlist group (from 6.72 to 5.08; P=.20; Cohen d=0.36). Perceived stress score of the treatment group also significantly decreased (from 2.95 to 2.72; P=.04; Cohen d=0.46) but not in the waitlist group (from 2.82 to 2.74; P=.55; Cohen d=0.15).Conclusions: This study provided experimental evidence that mobile phone–based physical activity program affects depression significantly. By exploring the potential of mobile phone–based physical activity programs as a treatment option, this study sought to improve accessibility and encourage participation in physical activity, ultimately promoting better mental health outcomes for individuals with depression and stress.

Previous studies have reported that occupational stress is a determinant risk factor for both chronic diseases and job performance among organizational leaders. Every occupation has its own culture and occupational climate influencing organizations within the industries. Thus, due to the idiosyncratic features inherent in sports, athletic directors may experience different occupational stressors. To date, there has been no comprehensive review of the occupational stress in athletic director contexts. Thus, based on the literature on both occupational stress and sport leadership, this study proposes a conceptual framework of occupational stress in sport leadership. The model identifies the five higher-order themes of occupational stressors and their associations with the first-level outcomes of individuals and the second-level outcomes of organizations. It also includes the two higher-order moderators of personal and organizational factors. It is hoped that this initiative can invoke interest in this topic to provide health-enhancing environments for athletic directors and quality sport services to society.

This study aimed to examine the associations of Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs with physical activity (PA) participation intention and self-reported PA participation among older adults in South Korea. Specifically, we examined whether perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy were associated with PA participation intention and PA participation, and whether intention accounted for indirect associations between HBM constructs and PA within the hypothesized model. A total of 408 older adults (Mage = 68.84, SD = 4.11) participated in the online survey. This study employed Structural Equation Modeling to examine the interrelationships among the proposed variables. The findings indicated a significant negative association between perceived barriers and PA participation intention and a significant positive association between self-efficacy and PA participation intention. Furthermore, intention was positively associated with PA and accounted for indirect associations linking perceived barriers and self-efficacy with PA. Overall, these findings suggest that perceived barriers and self-efficacy are salient belief domains linked to PA intention and behavior. Practical implications include further interventions to reduce perceived barriers and enhance self-efficacy to promote sustained PA engagement among older adults.

BACKGROUND Depression is a substantial global health problem, affecting >300 million people and resulting in 12.7% of all deaths. Depression causes various physical and cognitive problems, leading to a 5-year to 10-year decrease in life expectancy compared with the general population. Physical activity is known to be an effective, evidence-based treatment for depression. However, people generally have difficulties with participating in physical activity owing to limitations in time and accessibility. OBJECTIVE To address this issue, this study aimed to contribute to the development of alternative and innovative intervention methods for depression and stress management in adults. More specifically, we attempted to investigate the effectiveness of a mobile phone–based physical activity program on depression, perceived stress, psychological well-being, and quality of life among adults in South Korea. METHODS Participants were recruited and randomly assigned to the mobile phone intervention or waitlist group. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess variables before and after treatment. The treatment group used the program around 3 times per week at home for 4 weeks, with each session lasting about 30 minutes. To evaluate the program’s impact, a 2 (condition) × 2 (time) repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted, considering pretreatment and posttreatment measures along with group as independent variables. For a more detailed analysis, paired-samples 2-tailed t tests were used to compare pretreatment and posttreatment measurements within each group. Independent-samples 2-tailed t tests were conducted to assess intergroup differences in pretreatment measurements. RESULTS The study included a total of 68 adults aged between 18 and 65 years, who were recruited both through web-based and offline methods. Of these 68 individuals, 41 (60%) were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 27 (40%) to the waitlist group. The attrition rate was 10.2% after 4 weeks. The findings indicated that there is a significant main effect of time (F1,60=15.63; P=.003; ηp2=0.21) in participants’ depression scores, indicating that there were changes in depression level across time. No significant changes were observed in perceived stress (P=.25), psychological well-being (P=.35), or quality of life (P=.07). Furthermore, depression scores significantly decreased in the treatment group (from 7.08 to 4.64; P=.03; Cohen d=0.50) but not in the waitlist group (from 6.72 to 5.08; P=.20; Cohen d=0.36). Perceived stress score of the treatment group also significantly decreased (from 2.95 to 2.72; P=.04; Cohen d=0.46) but not in the waitlist group (from 2.82 to 2.74; P=.55; Cohen d=0.15). CONCLUSIONS This study provided experimental evidence that mobile phone–based physical activity program affects depression significantly. By exploring the potential of mobile phone–based physical activity programs as a treatment option, this study sought to improve accessibility and encourage participation in physical activity, ultimately promoting better mental health outcomes for individuals with depression and stress.