Tao Ju

Tao Ju

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 June 2024 in Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJTao Ju
Tao Ju
LLLinjuan Li
Linjuan Li
SLShuai Liu
Shuai Liu
Yu ZhangYu Zhang
Yu Zhang

18 January 2026 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJTao Ju
Tao Ju
ZWZhiqing Wang
Zhiqing Wang
HKHeting Kang
Heting Kang
JHJiuyuan Huo
Jiuyuan Huo
TGTao Gu
Tao Gu

10 November 2023 in Future Generation Computer Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLShuai Liu
Shuai Liu
TJTao Ju
Tao Ju

8 April 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TJTao Ju
Tao Ju
YZYan Zhang
Yan Zhang
XZXueJun Zhang
XueJun Zhang
XDXiaogang Du
Xiaogang Du
XDXiaoshe Dong
Xiaoshe Dong
Improving computing performance and reducing energy consumption are a major concern in heterogeneous many-core systems. The thread count directly influences the computing performance and energy consumption for a multithread application running on a heterogeneous many-core system. For this work, we studied the interrelation between the thread count and the performance of applications to improve total energy efficiency. A prediction model of the optimum thread count, hereafter the thread count prediction model (TCPM), was designed by using regression analysis based on the program running behaviors and heterogeneous many-core architecture feature. Subsequently, a dynamic predictive thread mapping (DPTM) framework was proposed. DPTM uses the prediction model to estimate the optimum thread count and dynamically adjusts the number of active hardware threads according to the phase changes of the running program in order to achieve the optimal energy efficiency. Experimental results show that DPTM obtains a nearly 49% improvement in performance and a 59% reduction in energy consumption on average. Moreover, DPTM introduces about 2% additional overhead compared with traditional thread mapping for PARSEC (The Princeton Application Repository for Shared-Memory Computers) benchmark programs running on an Intel MIC (Many integrated core) heterogeneous many-core system.