Onay Burak Dogan

Dr. Onay Burak Dogan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2019 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ODOnay Burak Dogan
Onay Burak Dogan
JCJennifer Clarke
Jennifer Clarke
FMFabio Mattos
Fabio Mattos
Bing WangBing Wang
Bing Wang

1 March 2020 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ODOnay Burak Dogan
Onay Burak Dogan
YMYulie E. Meneses
Yulie E. Meneses
RFRolando A. Flores
Rolando A. Flores
Bing WangBing Wang
Bing Wang

8 July 2023 in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ODOnay Burak Dogan
Onay Burak Dogan
MFMakenzie Grayce Flach
Makenzie Grayce Flach
MMMarkus F. Miller
Markus F. Miller
MBMindy M. Brashears
Mindy M. Brashears

28 November 2022 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMakenzie Grayce Flach
Makenzie Grayce Flach
ODOnay Burak Dogan
Onay Burak Dogan
WKWanda M. Kreikemeier
Wanda M. Kreikemeier
KNKendra K. Nightingale
Kendra K. Nightingale
MBMindy M. Brashears
Mindy M. Brashears
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and concentration of foodborne pathogens in the feces and peripheral lymph nodes (PLNs) of beef cattle when supplemented with direct-fed microbials (DFMs) in feedlots. Fecal samples were collected from the pen floors over a 5-month period at three different feedlots in a similar geographical location in Nebraska, where each feed yard represented a treatment group: (i.) control: no supplement, (ii.) Bovamine Defend: supplemented with NP51 and NP24 at a target dose of 9 log10CFU/g/head/day, and (iii.) Probicon: supplemented with L28 at a target dose of 6 log10CFU/g/head/day. Each fecal sample was tested for the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella, and concentration of E. coli O157:H7, Enterobacteriaceae and Clostridium perfringens. Cattle were harvested and PLNs were collected on the harvest floor. Real-time Salmonella PCR assays were performed for each PLN sample to determine Salmonella presence. The cattle supplemented with both DFMs had reduced foodborne pathogens in fecal samples, but feces collected from the pens housing the cattle supplemented with Probicon consistently had significantly less E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella prevalence as well as a lower C. perfringens concentration. While DFMs do not eliminate foodborne pathogens in fecal shedding and PLNs, the use of DFMs as a pre-harvest intervention allows for an effective way to target multiple pathogens reducing the public health risks and environmental dissemination from cattle.

14 April 2022 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DVDavid A. Vargas
David A. Vargas
KRKarla M. Rodríguez
Karla M. Rodríguez
GBGabriela Karolina Betancourt-Barszcz
Gabriela Karolina Betancourt-Barszcz
MAManoella I. Ajcet-Reyes
Manoella I. Ajcet-Reyes
ODOnay Burak Dogan
Onay Burak Dogan
MMMarkus F. Miller
Markus F. Miller
The objective was to conduct a bio-mapping of microbial indicators to determine statistical process control (SPC) parameters at a beef processing plant to establish microbiological baselines and process control parameters to support food safety management decisions. EZ-ReachTM swabs were used to collect 100 cm2 area samples at seven different locations throughout the beef processing line at four different regions on the carcass. Each of the eight sampling days evaluated included three samples collected per sampling location/carcass region for a total of 84 samples per day. Enumeration of total aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli was performed on each sample. Microbial SPC parameters were estimated for each sampling point. Statistical differences between sampling points for all carcass locations (p < 0.001) followed an overall trend with higher values at pre- and post-evisceration with a continuous decrease until final interventions with a slight increase in counts during the chilling process and a final increase after fabrication. Variability at sampling points is the result of the nature of the process and highlights open opportunities for improvement of the food safety system. Microbial baselines and SPC parameters will help support decision making for continuous process improvement, validation of intervention schemes, and corrective action implementation for food safety management.

1 July 2020 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JOJuan E. Ortúzar
Juan E. Ortúzar
ODOnay Burak Dogan
Onay Burak Dogan
GSGustavo Sotomayor
Gustavo Sotomayor
CJConstanza Jiménez
Constanza Jiménez
JCJennifer Clarke
Jennifer Clarke
BWBing Wang
Bing Wang