Hyperbaric storage (HS), storage under pressure at 25°C and 30°C, of a ready‐to‐eat (RTE) soup was studied and compared with refrigeration. Soup was stored at different time (4 and 8 h), temperature (4°C, 25°C, and 30°C), and pressure (0.1, 100, and 150 MPa) conditions, to compare microbial loads and physicochemical parameters. HS resulted in similar (microbial growth inhibition) to better (microbial inactivation) results compared to refrigeration, leading to equal and lower microbial loads, respectively, at the end of storage. Lower/higher pressure (100 vs. 150 MPa) and shorter/longer storage times (4 vs. 8 h) resulted in more pronounced microbial growth inhibition/microbial inactivation. Aerobic mesophiles showed less susceptibility to HS, compared to Enterobacteriaceae and yeast and molds. HS maintained generally the physicochemical parameters at values similar to refrigeration. Thus, HS with no need for temperature control throughout storage and so basically energetically costless, is a potential alternative to refrigeration.

From 2012, the preservation of food products under pressure has been increasingly studied and the knowledge acquired has enlarged since several food products have been studied at different storage conditions. This new food preservation methodology concept called Hyperbaric Storage (HS) has gain relevance due to its potential as a replacement or an improvement to the conventional cold storage processes, such as the traditional refrigeration (RF), or even frosting, from the energetic savings to the reduction of the carbon foot-print. Briefly, HS is capable to inhibit the microbial proliferation or its inactivation which results in the extension of the shelf-life of several food products when compared to RF. Moreover, the overall quality parameters seem not to be affected by HS, being the differences detected on samples over storage similar to lower when compared to the ones stored at RF. This review paper aims to gather data from all studies carried out so far regarding HS performance, mainly at room temperature on fruit juices, meat and fisheries, as well on dairy products and ready-to-eat meals. The HS advantages as a new food preservation methodology are presented and explained, being also discussed the industrial viability and environmental impact of this methodology, as well its limitations.

Raw milk (a highly perishable food) was preserved at variable room temperature (RT) under hyperbaric storage (HS) (50-100 MPa) for 60 days and compared with refrigeration (RF) under atmospheric pressure (AP) on quality, nutritional, and endogenous enzyme activity parameters. Overall, a comparable raw milk preservation outcome was observed between storage under AP/RF and 50/RT after 14 days, with similar variations in the parameters studied indicating milk degradation. Differently, even after 60 days (the maximum period studied) under 75-100/RT, a slower milk degradation was achieved, keeping most of the parameters similar to those of milk prior to storage, including pH, titratable acidity, total solid content, density, color, viscosity, and volatile organic and fatty acid profiles, but with higher free amino acid content, signs of an overall better preservation. These results indicate an improved preservation and enhanced shelf life of raw milk by HS/RT versus RF, showing HS potential for milk and highly perishable food preservation in general.