Nikolett Eisenbeck

Dr. Nikolett Eisenbeck


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 July 2021 in International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NENikolett Eisenbeck
Nikolett Eisenbeck
DCDavid F. Carreno
David F. Carreno
PWPaul T.P. Wong
Paul T.P. Wong
JHJoshua A. Hicks
Joshua A. Hicks
RMRuíz-Ruano García María
Ruíz-Ruano García María
JGJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
This study examined the role of different psychological coping mechanisms in mental and physical health during the initial phases of the COVID-19 crisis with an emphasis on meaning-centered coping. A total of 11,227 people from 30 countries across all continents participated in the study and completed measures of psychological distress (depression, stress, and anxiety), loneliness, well-being, and physical health, together with measures of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping, and a measure called the Meaning-centered Coping Scale (MCCS) that was developed in the present study. Validation analyses of the MCCS were performed in all countries, and data were assessed by multilevel modeling (MLM). The MCCS showed a robust one-factor structure in 30 countries with good test-retest, concurrent and divergent validity results. MLM analyses showed mixed results regarding emotion and problem-focused coping strategies. However, the MCCS was the strongest positive predictor of physical and mental health among all coping strategies, independently of demographic characteristics and country-level variables. The findings suggest that the MCCS is a valid measure to assess meaning-centered coping. The results also call for policies promoting effective coping to mitigate collective suffering during the pandemic.

1 July 2019 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NENikolett Eisenbeck
Nikolett Eisenbeck
DCDavid F. Carreno
David F. Carreno
RURubén Uclés-Juárez
Rubén Uclés-Juárez

17 March 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NENikolett Eisenbeck
Nikolett Eisenbeck
DCDavid F. Carreno
David F. Carreno
JPJosé Antonio Pérez-Escobar
José Antonio Pérez-Escobar
The COVID-19 pandemic has subjected most of the world’s population to unprecedented situations, like national lockdowns, health hazards, social isolation and economic harm. Such a scenario calls for urgent measures not only to palliate it but also, to better cope with it. According to existential positive psychology, well-being does not simply represent a lack of stress and negative emotions but highlights their importance by incorporating an adaptive relationship with them. Thus, suffering can be mitigated (and transformed into growth) by, among other factors, adopting an attitude of positive reframing, maintaining hope, existential courage, life appreciation, engagement in meaningful activities, and prosociality. The conglomerate of these elements has been recently denominated as meaning-centered coping. In this study, we evaluated the protective role of this type of coping on mental health. A sample of 12,243 participants from 30 countries across all continents completed measures of Meaning-Centered Coping Scale (MCCS), depression, stress, anxiety and stressful COVID-19 related conditions they experienced. Results indicated that meaning-centered coping was strongly associated with diminished symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression. Moreover, it moderated various relationships between vulnerability factors and markers of psychological distress, especially in the case of depression. These findings call for attention to meaning-centered coping approaches in the context of hardship, such as the current COVID-19 health crisis. In these difficult times, decision-makers and health organizations may integrate these approaches into their guidelines.

1 September 2021 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJoseph Maffly-Kipp
Joseph Maffly-Kipp
NENikolett Eisenbeck
Nikolett Eisenbeck
DCDavid F. Carreno
David F. Carreno
JHJoshua Hicks
Joshua Hicks

10 February 2022 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJinhyung Kim
Jinhyung Kim
PHPatricia Holte
Patricia Holte
FMFrank Martela
Frank Martela
CSColin Shanahan
Colin Shanahan
ZLZhanhong Li
Zhanhong Li
JHJoshua A. Hicks
Joshua A. Hicks

1 May 2020 in International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDavid F. Carreno
David F. Carreno
NENikolett Eisenbeck
Nikolett Eisenbeck
ACAdolfo J. Cangas
Adolfo J. Cangas
JGJosé M. García-Montes
José M. García-Montes
LVLaura G. Del Vas
Laura G. Del Vas
AMAlejandro T. María
Alejandro T. María
This study aimed to adapt the Personal Meaning Profile-Brief (PMP-B) to the Spanish-speaking population and investigate its psychometric properties. The PMP-B is a 21-item instrument that assesses meaning in life through seven sources: relationship, intimacy, achievement, self-acceptance, self-transcendence, fair treatment, and religion. Participants were 546 Spanish adults comprised of a community sample (n = 171) and university students (n = 375). The PMP-B, the Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale were administrated. The PMP-B showed a bifactor structure with one general factor and seven subfactors. Measurement invariance was found across age, gender, and samples. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were generally good. Older people showed higher PMP-B scores than younger people. The PMP-B scores, especially relational sources of meaning, were positively associated with psychological well-being and negatively related to psychological distress, mainly to depression. The validity evidence gathered in this study supports the reliable use of the PMP-B to measure meaning in life. The PMP-B can be a noteworthy contribution to the meaning-centered research.
1