Yantao YU

Dr. Yantao YU

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2018 in Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xincong YangXincong Yang
Xincong Yang
Heng LiHeng Li
Heng Li
Yantao YUYantao YU
Yantao YU
XLXiaochun Luo
Xiaochun Luo
THTing Huang
Ting Huang
XYXu Yang
Xu Yang
The spatial characteristics of cracks are significant indicators to assess and evaluate the health of existing buildings and infrastructures. However, the current manual crack description method is time consuming and labor consuming. To improve the efficiency of crack inspection, advanced computer vision‐based techniques have been utilized to detect cracks automatically at image level and grid‐cell level. But existing crack detections are of (high specificity) low generality and inefficient, in terms that conventional approaches are unable to identify and measure diverse cracks concurrently at pixel level. Therefore, this research implements a novel deep learning technique named fully convolutional network (FCN) to address this problem. First, FCN is trained by feeding multiple types of cracks to semantically identify and segment pixel‐wise cracks at different scales. Then, the predicted crack segmentations are represented by single‐pixel width skeletons to quantitatively measure the morphological features of cracks, providing valuable crack indicators for assessment in practice, such as crack topology, crack length, max width, and mean width. To validate the prediction, the predicted segmentations are compared with recent advanced method for crack recognition and ground truth. For crack segmentation, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are 97.96%, 81.73%, 78.97%, and 79.95%, respectively. For crack length, the relative measurement error varies from −48.03% to 177.79%, meanwhile that ranges from −13.27% to 24.01% for crack width. The results show that FCN is feasible and sufficient for crack identification and measurement. Although the accuracy is not as high as CrackNet because of three types of errors, the prediction has been increased to pixel level and the training time has been dramatically decreased to several per cents of previous methods due to the novel end‐to‐end structure of FCN, which combines typical convolutional neural networks and deconvolutional layers.

1 January 2017 in Automation in Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HGHongling Guo
Hongling Guo
Yantao YUYantao YU
Yantao YU
MSMartin Skitmore
Martin Skitmore

1 July 2019 in Automation in Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yantao YUYantao YU
Yantao YU
Heng LiHeng Li
Heng Li
Xincong YangXincong Yang
Xincong Yang
LKLiulin Kong
Liulin Kong
XLXiaochun Luo
Xiaochun Luo
Arnold Y.L. WongArnold Y.L. Wong
Arnold Y.L. Wong

1 January 2018 in Advanced Engineering Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QFQi Fang
Qi Fang
Heng LiHeng Li
Heng Li
XLXiaochun Luo
Xiaochun Luo
LDLieyun Ding
Lieyun Ding
TRTimothy Rose
Timothy Rose
Yantao YUYantao YU
Yantao YU


1 October 2017 in Automation in Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yantao YUYantao YU
Yantao YU
HGHongling Guo
Hongling Guo
QDQinghua Ding
Qinghua Ding
Heng LiHeng Li
Heng Li
MSMartin Skitmore
Martin Skitmore