Chao Tong

Dr. Chao Tong


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in Computer Networks
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TYTingting Yang
Tingting Yang
XLXiang Long
Xiang Long
Arun Kumar SangaiahArun Kumar Sangaiah
Arun Kumar Sangaiah
ZZZhigao Zheng
Zhigao Zheng
Chao TongChao Tong
Chao Tong

23 May 2025 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BLBaoyu Liang
Baoyu Liang
YWYuchen Wang
Yuchen Wang
Chao TongChao Tong
Chao Tong
The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) demands AI systems that not only perceive but also reason in a human-like manner. While symbolic systems pioneered early breakthroughs in logic-based reasoning, such as MYCIN and DENDRAL, they suffered from brittleness and poor scalability. Conversely, modern deep learning architectures have achieved remarkable success in perception tasks, yet continue to fall short in interpretable and structured reasoning. This dichotomy has motivated growing interest in Neural–Symbolic AI, a paradigm that integrates symbolic logic with neural computation to unify reasoning and learning. This survey provides a comprehensive and technically grounded overview of AI reasoning in the deep learning era, with a particular focus on Neural–Symbolic AI. Beyond a historical narrative, we introduce a formal definition of AI reasoning and propose a novel three-dimensional taxonomy that organizes reasoning paradigms by representation form, task structure, and application context. We then systematically review recent advances—including Differentiable Logic Programming, abductive learning, program induction, logic-aware Transformers, and LLM-based symbolic planning—highlighting their technical mechanisms, capabilities, and limitations. In contrast to prior surveys, this work bridges symbolic logic, neural computation, and emergent generative reasoning, offering a unified framework to understand and compare diverse approaches. We conclude by identifying key open challenges such as symbolic–continuous alignment, dynamic rule learning, and unified architectures, and we aim to provide a conceptual foundation for future developments in general-purpose reasoning systems.

1 December 2018 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TWTao Wan
Tao Wan
HFHongxiang Feng
Hongxiang Feng
Chao TongChao Tong
Chao Tong
DLDeyu Li
Deyu Li
ZQZengchang Qin
Zengchang Qin

1 September 2020 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TWTao Wan
Tao Wan
LZLei Zhao
Lei Zhao
HFHongxiang Feng
Hongxiang Feng
DLDeyu Li
Deyu Li
Chao TongChao Tong
Chao Tong
ZQZengchang Qin
Zengchang Qin

1 November 2018 in Future Generation Computer Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Chao TongChao Tong
Chao Tong
XYXiang Yin
Xiang Yin
SWShili Wang
Shili Wang
ZZZhigao Zheng
Zhigao Zheng

28 May 2019 in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jinming WenJinming Wen
Jinming Wen
JWJian Weng
Jian Weng
Chao TongChao Tong
Chao Tong
CRChao Ren
Chao Ren
ZZZhengchun Zhou
Zhengchun Zhou
The key aim of compressed sensing is to stably recover a $K$ -sparse signals $\x$ from a linear model $\y=\A\x+\v$ , where $\v$ is a noise vector. Minimization of $\|\x\|_1-\|\x\|_2$ is a recently proposed effective recovery method. In this paper, we show that if the mutual coherence $\mu$ of $\A$ satisfies $\mu<\frac{1}{3K}$ , then this method can stably recover any $K$ -sparse signal $\x$ based on $\y$ and $\A$ . As far as we know, this is the first sufficient condition based on mutual coherence for this method.