Ana Rita Oliveira Goes

Dr. Ana Rita Oliveira Goes

1. Comprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo Mártires da Pátria 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2015 in Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLuisa Barros
Luisa Barros
Ana Rita Oliveira GoesAna Rita Oliveira Goes
Ana Rita Oliveira Goes
APAna Isabel Pereira
Ana Isabel Pereira
This work presents a theoretical and integrative review about parental self-regulation and emotional regulation processes, and its connections with parental coping and temperament. Parents' adaptation requires the ability to regulate their own behavior in reaction to their perception and interpretation of the child's behavior. These self-regulation processes are often intertwined with intense emotions that need to be regulated. Parenting attitudes and behaviors cannot be fully understood without considering the parents' emotional dysregulation and their emotional regulation strategies. However, only few studies focus the effects of parents' emotional regulation strategies on the parenting behavior. Experiential avoidance and overprotection are discussed as extreme cases of parental emotional regulation strategies that may have particularly detrimental effects in childrearing. The authors propose that, although the main parenting interventions already use a self-regulation approach, specific training in adaptive emotional regulation strategies should be included in these programs.

PSPatrícia Soares
Patrícia Soares
ALAndreia Leite
Andreia Leite
SESara Esteves
Sara Esteves
AGAna Gama
Ana Gama
PLPedro Almeida Laires
Pedro Almeida Laires
Sónia DiasSónia Dias
Sónia Dias
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in healthcare use. This study aimed to identify factors associated with a patient’s decision to avoid and/or delay healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used data from a community-based survey in Portugal from July 2020 to August 2021, “COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion”, which included data regarding health services use, risk perception and confidence in health services. We framed our analysis under Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Services Use and utilised Poisson regression to identify healthcare avoidance associated factors. Healthcare avoidance was high (44%). Higher prevalence of healthcare avoidance was found among women; participants who reported lower confidence in the healthcare system response to COVID-19 and non-COVID-19; lost income during the pandemic; experienced negative emotions due to physical distancing measures; answered the questionnaire before middle June 2021; and perceived having worse health, the measures implemented by the Government as inadequate, the information conveyed as unclear and confusing, a higher risk of getting COVID-19, a higher risk of complications and a higher risk of getting infected in a health institution. It is crucial to reassure the population that health services are safe. Health services should plan their recovery since delays in healthcare delivery can lead to increased or worsening morbidity, yielding economic and societal costs.

31 May 2021 in Frontiers in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sónia DiasSónia Dias
Sónia Dias
AGAna Gama
Ana Gama
AMAna Catarina Maia
Ana Catarina Maia
MMMaria J. Marques
Maria J. Marques
AFAdalberto Campos Fernandes
Adalberto Campos Fernandes
RORichard Osborne
Richard Osborne
The drivers of high prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCD) among migrants are well-documented. Health literacy is regarded as a potential tool to reduce health inequalities and improve migrant's access to and quality of health care. Yet, little is known about the health literacy needs among these groups and how to address them. This paper outlines the protocol for a migrant community-based co-design project that seeks to optimize health literacy, health promotion, and social cohesion in support of prevention of NCDs among migrants in Lisbon using the OPtismizing HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) process. This participatory implementation research project starts with a mixed-methods needs assessment covering health literacy strengths, weaknesses and needs of migrants, and local data about determinants of health behaviors, service engagement, and organizational responsiveness. Diverse migrant groups will be engaged and surveyed using the Health Literacy Questionnaire and questions on sociodemographic and economic characteristics, health status, use of health services, and perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Semi-structured interviews with migrants will also be conducted. Based on data collected, vignettes will be developed representing typical persons with diverse health literacy profiles. Migrants and stakeholders will participate in ideas generation workshops for depth co-creation discussions in simulated real-world situations based on the vignettes, to design health literacy-based multisectoral interventions. Selected interventions will be piloted through quality improvement cycles to ensure ongoing local refinements and ownership development. Through a genuine engagement, the project will evaluate the uptake, effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions. This protocol takes a grounded approach to produce evidence on real health literacy needs from the perspective of key stakeholders, especially migrants, and embodies strong potential for effective knowledge translation into innovative, locally relevant, culturally and context congruent solutions for prevention of NCDs among migrants. Given the diverse communities engaged, this protocol will likely be adaptable to other migrant groups in a wide range of contexts, particularly in European countries. The scale-up of interventions to similar contexts and populations will provide much needed evidence on how health literacy interventions can be developed and applied to reduce health inequality and improve health in diverse communities.

25 July 2014 in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAna Isabel Pereira
Ana Isabel Pereira
PMPeter Muris
Peter Muris
LBLuisa Barros
Luisa Barros
Ana Rita Oliveira GoesAna Rita Oliveira Goes
Ana Rita Oliveira Goes
TMTeresa Marques
Teresa Marques
VRVanessa Russo
Vanessa Russo

14 April 2015 in Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAna Isabel Pereira
Ana Isabel Pereira
PMPeter Muris
Peter Muris
DMDenisa Mendonça
Denisa Mendonça
LBLuisa Barros
Luisa Barros
Ana Rita Oliveira GoesAna Rita Oliveira Goes
Ana Rita Oliveira Goes
TMTeresa Marques
Teresa Marques

12 February 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGInes Gomes
Ines Gomes
PSPatrícia Soares
Patrícia Soares
JRJoão Victor Rocha
João Victor Rocha
AGAna Gama
Ana Gama
PLPedro Almeida Laires
Pedro Almeida Laires
CNCarla Nunes
Carla Nunes
An online cross-sectional study on COVID-19 vaccination adhesion was conducted in Portugal nine months after vaccination rollout (September–November 2021). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with hesitancy to take the COVID-19 vaccine in the community-based survey, “COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion”. Hesitancy was 11%; however, of those, 60.5% stated that they intended to take the vaccine. Hesitancy was associated with factors such as lower monthly household income; no intention of taking the flu vaccine this year; perceived reasonable health status; having two or more diseases; low confidence in the health service response; worse perception of the adequacy of anti-COVID-19 government measures; low or no perceived risk of getting COVID-19; feeling agitated, anxious or sad some days; and lack of trust in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Confidence in vaccines, namely against COVID-19, is paramount for public health and should be monitored during vaccination rollout. Clear communication of the risks and benefits of vaccination needs improvement to increase adherence and public confidence.