The amount of PCDD/F emissions produced by gasification operations is often within standard limits set by national and international laws (<0.1 ng TEQ/Nm3). However, a recent assessment of the literature indicates that gasification cannot always reduce PCDD/Fs emissions to acceptable levels, and thus a common belief on the replacement of incineration with gasification in order to reduce PCDD/Fs emissions seems overly simplistic. A review that summarizes the evidence on when gasification would likely result in environmentally benign emissions with PCDD/F below legal limits, and when not, would be of scientific and practical interest. Moreover, there are no reviews on dioxin formation in gasification. This review discusses the available data on the levels of dioxins formed by gasifying different waste streams, such as municipal solid wastes, plastics, wood waste, animal manure, and sewage sludge, from the existing experimental work. The PCDD/Fs formation in gasification and the operational parameters that can be controlled during the process to minimize PCDD/Fs formation are reviewed.
Pyrolysis is a technology capable of harnessing energy from challenging-to-recycle plastics, thus mitigating the necessity for incineration or landfill disposal. To optimize the plastic pyrolysis process, reliable models for product yield prediction are imperative. This study endeavors to determine the suitability of lumped models, a widely used approach for modeling biomass and coal pyrolysis, in accurately estimating product yields in the context of plastic pyrolysis. To address this question, three lumped models with parallel and competitive reaction mechanisms were compared and fitted to experimental data collected across a broad temperature range. The aim is to identify which models can elucidate the most appropriate reaction pathway for the plastic pyrolysis process. The first model in this study assesses whether the commonly employed wood pyrolysis kinetic models can effectively fit the experimental data from plastic pyrolysis. Subsequently, the final two models introduce additional reactions into the pyrolysis process, prompting the authors to investigate the necessity of these supplementary reaction pathways for accurately predicting plastic pyrolysis outcomes. This investigation seeks to pinpoint the essential terms and discern which ones may be safely omitted from the models. The results of the study reveal that the model incorporating secondary tar reactions with gas, tar, and char is the most precise in predicting the products of plastic pyrolysis, surpassing all other combinations evaluated in this research.
Pyrolysis is a low-emission and sustainable thermochemical technique used in the production of biofuels, which can be used as an alternative to fossil fuels. Understanding the kinetic characterization of biomass pyrolysis is essential for process upscaling and optimization. There is no accepted model that can predict pyrolysis kinetics over a wide range of pyrolysis conditions and biomass types. This study investigates whether or not the classical lumped kinetic model with a three-competitive reaction scheme can accurately predict the walnut shell pyrolysis product yields. The experimental data were obtained from walnut shell pyrolysis experiments at different temperatures (300–600 °C) using a fixed-bed reactor. The chosen reaction scheme was in good agreement with our experimental data for low temperatures, where the primary degradation of biomass occurred (300 and 400 °C). However, at higher temperatures, there was less agreement with the model, indicating that some other reactions may occur at such temperatures. Hence, further studies are needed to investigate the use of detailed reaction schemes to accurately predict the char, tar, and gas yields for all types of biomass pyrolysis.