Zoé AP THOMAS

Dr. Zoé AP THOMAS

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 February 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAnne-Laure Couderc
Anne-Laure Couderc
ELEvelyne Liuu
Evelyne Liuu
PBPascaline BOUDOU-ROUQUETTE
Pascaline BOUDOU-ROUQUETTE
JPJohanne Poisson
Johanne Poisson
MFMaxime Frélaut
Maxime Frélaut
FPFrederic Pamoukdjian
Frederic Pamoukdjian
This study will address the prevalence of pre-therapeutic sarcopenia (PS) and its clinical impact during cancer treatment among adult cancer patients ≥ 18 years of age. A meta-analysis (MA) with random-effect models was performed via a MEDLINE systematic review, according to the PRISMA statement, focusing on articles published before February 2022 that reported observational studies and clinical trials on the prevalence of PS and the following outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), post-operative complications (POC), toxicities (TOX), and nosocomial infections (NI). A total of 65,936 patients (mean age: 45.7–85 y) with various cancer sites and extensions and various treatment modes were included. Mainly defined by CT scan-based loss of muscle mass only, the pooled prevalence of PS was 38.0%. The pooled relative risks were 1.97, 1.76, 2.70, 1.47, and 1.76 for OS, PFS, POC, TOX, and NI, respectively (moderate-to-high heterogeneity, I2: 58–85%). Consensus-based algorithm definitions of sarcopenia, integrating low muscle mass and low levels of muscular strength and/or physical performance, lowered the prevalence (22%) and heterogeneity (I2 < 50%). They also increased the predictive values with RRs ranging from 2.31 (OS) to 3.52 (POC). PS among cancer patients is prevalent and strongly associated with poor outcomes during cancer treatment, especially when considering a consensus-based algorithm approach.

24 November 2023 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLayal Rached
Layal Rached
AGArthur GERAUD
Arthur GERAUD
MFMaxime Frélaut
Maxime Frélaut
ZTZoé AP THOMAS
Zoé AP THOMAS
VGVincent Goldschmidt
Vincent Goldschmidt
CBCapucine Baldini
Capucine Baldini

27 December 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPhilippe Wind
Philippe Wind
ZTZoé AP THOMAS
Zoé AP THOMAS
MLMarie Laurent
Marie Laurent
TAThomas Aparicio
Thomas Aparicio
MSMatthieu Siebert
Matthieu Siebert
FPFrederic Pamoukdjian
Frederic Pamoukdjian
We aimed to assess the prognostic value of the pre-operative GRADE score for long-term survival among older adults undergoing major surgery for digestive or non-breast gynaecological cancers. Between 2013 and 2019, 136 consecutive older adults with cancer were prospectively recruited from the PF-EC cohort study before major cancer surgery and underwent a geriatric assessment. The GRADE score includes weight loss, gait speed at the threshold of 0.8 m/s, cancer site and cancer extension. The primary outcome was post-operative 5-year mortality. Patients were classified as low risk (GRADE ≤ 8) or high risk (GRADE > 8) on the basis of the median score. A Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression model was performed to assess the association between pre-operative factors and 5-year mortality expressed by adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% CI. The median age was 80 years, 52% were men, 73% had colorectal cancer. The 30-day post-operative severe complication rate (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) was 37%. The 5-year post-operative mortality rate was 34.5%. A GRADE score ≥ 8 (aHR = 2.64 [1.34–5.21], p = 0.0002) was associated with post-operative mortality after adjustment for Body Mass Index < 21 kg/m2 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living <3/4. By combining very simple geriatric and cancer parameters, the pre-operative GRADE score provides a discriminant prognosis and could help to choose the most suitable treatment strategy for older cancer patients, avoiding under or over-treatment.

9 June 2017 in Investigational New Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jean Marie MichotJean Marie Michot
Jean Marie Michot
LBLina Benajiba
Lina Benajiba
LFLaura Faivre
Laura Faivre
CBCapucine Baldini
Capucine Baldini
LHLelia Haddag
Lelia Haddag
VRVincent Ribrag
Vincent Ribrag