Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Consequences vary from mild cognitive impairment to death and, no matter the severity of subsequent sequelae, it represents a high burden for affected patients and for the health care system. Brain trauma can cause neuronal death through mechanical forces that disrupt cell architecture, and other secondary consequences through mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, programmed cell death, and, most importantly, excitotoxicity. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the many classical and novel pathways implicated in tissue damage following TBI. We summarize the preclinical evidence of potential therapeutic interventions and describe the available clinical evaluation of novel drug targets such as vitamin B12 and ifenprodil, among others.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease and the most frequent cause of progressive dementia in senior adults. It is characterized by memory loss and cognitive impairment secondary to cholinergic dysfunction and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-mediated neurotoxicity. Intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, extracellular plaques composed of amyloid-β (Aβ), and selective neurodegeneration are the anatomopathological hallmarks of this disease. The dysregulation of calcium may be present in all the stages of AD, and it is associated with other pathophysiological mechanisms, such as mitochondrial failure, oxidative stress, and chronic neuroinflammation. Although the cytosolic calcium alterations in AD are not completely elucidated, some calcium-permeable channels, transporters, pumps, and receptors have been shown to be involved at the neuronal and glial levels. In particular, the relationship between glutamatergic NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activity and amyloidosis has been widely documented. Other pathophysiological mechanisms involved in calcium dyshomeostasis include the activation of L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels, transient receptor potential channels, and ryanodine receptors, among many others. This review aims to update the calcium-dysregulation mechanisms in AD and discuss targets and molecules with therapeutic potential based on their modulation.
29 September 2022 in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
This review aims to describe the clinical spectrum of catatonia, in order to carefully assess the involvement of astrocytes, neurons, oligodendrocytes, and microglia, and articulate the available preclinical and clinical evidence to achieve a translational understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms behind this disorder. Catatonia is highly common in psychiatric and acutely ill patients, with prevalence ranging from 7.6% to 38%. It is usually present in different psychiatric conditions such as mood and psychotic disorders; it is also a consequence of folate deficiency, autoimmunity, paraneoplastic disorders, and even autistic spectrum disorders. Few therapeutic options are available due to its complexity and poorly understood physiopathology. We briefly revisit the traditional treatments used in catatonia, such as antipsychotics, electroconvulsive therapy, and benzodiazepines, before assessing novel therapeutics which aim to modulate molecular pathways through different mechanisms, including NMDA antagonism and its allosteric modulation, and anti-inflammatory drugs to modulate microglia reaction and mitigate oxidative stress, such as lithium, vitamin B12, and NMDAr positive allosteric modulators.
Corticosteroids are frequently prescribed across medical disciplines, yet they are associated with various adverse effects, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, documented since their introduction over 60 years ago. The cellular mechanisms underlying neuropsychiatric symptoms are complex and somewhat obscure, involving multiple pathways. Notably, they include changes in excitability, cellular death of hippocampal and striatal neurons, and increased inflammation and oxidative stress. Clinical presentation varies, encompassing affective disorders (anxiety, euphoria, depression), psychotic episodes, and cognitive deficits. It is crucial to note that these manifestations often go unnoticed by treating physicians, leading to delayed detection of severe symptoms, complications, and underreporting. Discontinuation of corticosteroids constitutes the cornerstone of treatment, resolving symptoms in up to 80% of cases. Although the literature on this topic is scant, isolated cases and limited studies have explored the efficacy of psychotropic medications for symptomatic control and prophylaxis. Pharmacological intervention may be warranted in situations where corticosteroid reduction or withdrawal is not feasible or beneficial for the patient.
Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder, estimated to affect at least one-third of the global population. There are a variety of treatment options available for both acute and chronic insomnia. Currently, the pharmacological arsenal for treating insomnia includes short- or intermediate-acting benzodiazepine hypnotics, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic sedatives, melatonin receptor agonists, orexin receptor antagonist, and sedating antidepressants. Diphenhydramine, a first-generation antihistamine, is commonly used in the treatment of allergies and dermatitis. This review examines the preclinical and clinical efficacy and safety evidence of diphenhydramine in treating short-term insomnia. Additionally, it provides expert consensus on its implementation as an over-the-counter medication for this condition. The available evidence indicates that diphenhydramine is an effective treatment for acute insomnia in adults, offering a safe and affordable option for most patients suffering from this condition. Experts concur that there is strong evidence supporting the recommendation of diphenhydramine for the treatment of acute insomnia in adults.
Background: Using Virtual Patients (VPs) in medical education has gained popularity, especially during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, which restricted traditional clinical training. VPs provide a learning platform for students to refine their clinical reasoning and decision-making skills in a risk-free environment. Although the educational benefits of VPs are well known, there is still a need for validated tools to assess student perceptions, which are key to optimizing learning outcomes. The Virtual Patient Integration Rating Scale (VPIRS) has made a valuable contribution in this regard, having been established in English-speaking contexts, but its applicability in Ibero-American countries remains poorly explored. This study aimed to fill this gap by transculturally validating VPIRS for Spanish-speaking medical education environments, ensuring it reflects cultural nuances. Methods: We conducted a two-phase transcultural validation of the VPIRS on medical students at the Universidad del Rosario. First, we translated and culturally adapted the VPIRS, using the modified Delphi method for face validation. Second, we assessed the construct validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, and reliability of the scale through a test-retest approach with 153 participants, using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and reliability testing in SPSS. Results: The VPIRS was successfully adapted and validated for transcultural use in Spanish (VPIRS-E). The exploratory and factor analyses maintained the original scale’s four-dimensional structure, explaining 61.8% of the total variance, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.826. Test-retest reliability demonstrated robust intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.8 to 0.9. Conclusion: The VPIRS-E is a reliable and valid instrument that has maintained the structural integrity of the original scale and has demonstrated strong internal consistency across all of its domains. These results demonstrate the suitability of the VPIRS-E to assess medical students’ perceptions of the use of VPs in Spanish-speaking learning contexts. The successful validation of this instrument also opens avenues for expanded international comparative studies, allowing fora deeper understanding of the effective integration of VPs in different medical education curricula.