Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is gaining traction as a safe and non-invasive technique in human studies. There has been a rapid increase in TUS human studies in recent years, with more than half of studies to date published after 2020. This rapid growth in the relevant body of literature necessitates comprehensive reviews to update clinicians and researchers. The aim of this work is to review human studies with an emphasis on TUS devices, sonication parameters, outcome measures, results, and adverse effects, as well as highlight future directions of investigation. A systematic review was conducted by searching the Web of Science and PubMed databases on January 12, 2022. Human studies of TUS were included. A total of 35 studies were identified using focused/unfocused ultrasound devices. A total of 677 subjects belonging to diverse cohorts (i.e., healthy, chronic pain, dementia, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, depression) were enrolled. The stimulation effects vary in a sonication parameter-dependant fashion. Clinical, neurophysiological, radiological and histological outcome measures were assessed. No severe adverse effects were reported in any of the studies surveyed. Mild symptoms were observed in 3.4% (14/425) of the subjects, including headache, mood deterioration, scalp heating, cognitive problems, neck pain, muscle twitches, anxiety, sleepiness and pruritis. Although increasingly being used, TUS is still in its early phases. TUS can change short-term brain excitability and connectivity, induce long-term plasticity, and modulate behavior. New techniques should be used to further elucidate its underlying mechanisms and identify its application in novel populations.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is becoming increasingly central in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. Recent developments in DBS lead and implantable pulse generator design provide increased flexibility for programming, potentially improving the therapeutic benefit of stimulation. Directional DBS leads may increase the therapeutic window of stimulation by providing a means of avoiding current spread to structures that might give rise to stimulation-related side effects. Similarly, control of current to individual contacts on a DBS lead allows for shaping of the electric field produced between multiple active contacts. The following review aims to describe the recent developments in DBS system technology and the features of each commercially available DBS system. The advantages of each system are reviewed, and general considerations for choosing the most appropriate system are discussed.

Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) offers precise, non-invasive neuromodulation, though its impact on human deep brain structures remains underexplored. Here we examined TUS-induced changes in the basal ganglia of 10 individuals with movement disorders (Parkinson’s disease and dystonia) and 15 healthy participants. Local field potentials were recorded using deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads in the globus pallidus internus (GPi). Compared to sham, theta burst TUS (tbTUS) increased theta power during stimulation, while 10 Hz TUS enhanced beta power, with effects lasting up to 40 min. In healthy participants, a stop-signal task assessed tbTUS effects on the GPi, with pulvinar stimulation serving as an active sham. GPi TUS prolonged stop-signal reaction times, indicating impaired response inhibition, whereas pulvinar TUS had no effect. These findings provide direct electrophysiological evidence of TUS target engagement and specificity in deep brain structures, suggesting its potential as a noninvasive DBS strategy for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Objective: Low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (TUS) is a novel method for neuromodulation. We aimed to study the feasibility of stimulating the bilateral primary motor cortices (M1) with accelerated theta‐burst TUS (a‐tbTUS) on neurophysiologic and clinical outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD).Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive active or sham a‐tbTUS for the first visit and the alternate condition on the second visit, at least 10 days apart. a‐tbTUS was administered in three consecutive sonications at 30‐minute intervals. We used an accelerated protocol to produce an additive effect of stimulation. Patients were studied in the OFF‐medication state. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)‐elicited motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs) were used to assess motor cortical excitability before and after TUS. Clinical outcomes after a‐tbTUS administration were assessed using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS)‐III.Results: A total of 20 visits were conducted in 10 PD patients. Compared to the baseline, TMS‐elicited MEP amplitudes significantly increased following active but not sham sonication (P = 0.0057). MEP amplitudes were also higher following a‐tbTUS than sham sonication (P = 0.0064). There were no statistically significant changes in MDS‐UPDRS‐III scores with active or sham a‐tbTUS.Conclusions: a‐tbTUS increases motor cortex excitability and is a feasible non‐invasive neuromodulation strategy in PD. Future studies should determine optimal dosing parameters and the durability of neurophysiologic and clinical outcomes in PD patients. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment option for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and epilepsy in the United States. There are disparities in access to DBS, and clear understanding of the contextual factors driving them is important. Previous studies aimed at understanding these factors have been limited by single indications or small cohort sizes. The aim of this study is to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis of DBS utilization for multiple indications to better understand the factors driving disparities in access. The United States based National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to analyze the surgical volume and trends of procedures based on indication, using relevant ICD codes. Predictors of DBS use were analyzed using a logistic regression model. DBS-implanted patients in each indication were compared based on the patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables. Our analysis of 104,356 DBS discharges from 1993 to 2017 revealed that the most frequent indications for DBS were PD (67%), ET (24%), and dystonia (4%). Although the number of DBS procedures has consistently increased over the years, radiofrequency ablation utilization has significantly decreased to only a few patients per year since 2003. Negative predictors for DBS utilization in PD and ET cohorts included age increase and female sex, while African American status was a negative predictor across all cohorts. Significant differences in patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables between DBS indications were also determined. Demographic and socioeconomic-based disparities in DBS use are evident. Although racial disparities are present across all indications, other disparities such as age, sex, wealth, and insurance status are only relevant in certain indications. This work was supported by Alan & Susan Hudson Cornerstone Chair in Neurosurgery at 10.13039/100009663 University Health Network .