It is known from histology studies that lung vessels are affected in viral pneumonia. However, their diagnostic potential as a chest CT imaging parameter has only rarely been exploited. The purpose of this study is to develop a robust method for automated lung vessel segmentation and morphology analysis and apply it to a large chest CT dataset. In total, 509 non-enhanced chest CTs (NECTs) and 563 CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) were included. Sub-groups were patients with healthy lungs (group_NORM, n = 634) and those RT-PCR-positive for Influenza A/B (group_INF, n = 159) and SARS-CoV-2 (group_COV, n = 279). A lung vessel segmentation algorithm (LVSA) based on traditional image processing was developed, validated with a point-of-interest approach, and applied to a large clinical dataset. Total blood vessel volume in lung (TBV) and the blood vessel volume percentage (BV%) of three blood vessel size types were calculated and compared between groups: small (BV5%, cross-sectional area < 5 mm²), medium (BV5-10%, 5-10 mm²) and large (BV10%, >10 mm²). Sensitivity of the LVSA was 84.6% (95 %CI: 73.9-95.3) for NECTs and 92.8% (95 %CI: 90.8-94.7) for CTPAs. In viral pneumonia, besides an increased TBV, the main finding was a significantly decreased BV5% in group_COV (n = 14%) and group_INF (n = 15%) compared to group_NORM (n = 18%) [p < 0.001]. At the same time, BV10% was increased (group_COV n = 15% and group_INF n = 14% vs. group_NORM n = 11%; p < 0.001). In COVID-19 and Influenza, the blood vessel volume is redistributed from small to large vessels in the lung. Automated LSVA allows researchers and clinicians to derive imaging parameters for large amounts of CTs. This can enhance the understanding of vascular changes, particularly in infectious lung diseases.

Objectives: High breast density is a well-known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to develop and adapt two (MLO, CC) deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for automatic breast density classification on synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions. Methods: In total, 4605 synthetic 2D images (1665 patients, age: 57 ± 37 years) were labeled according to the ACR (American College of Radiology) density (A-D). Two DCNNs with 11 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers each, were trained with 70% of the data, whereas 20% was used for validation. The remaining 10% were used as a separate test dataset with 460 images (380 patients). All mammograms in the test dataset were read blinded by two radiologists (reader 1 with two and reader 2 with 11 years of dedicated mammographic experience in breast imaging), and the consensus was formed as the reference standard. The inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were assessed by calculating Cohen’s kappa coefficients, and diagnostic accuracy measures of automated classification were evaluated. Results: The two models for MLO and CC projections had a mean sensitivity of 80.4% (95%-CI 72.2–86.9), a specificity of 89.3% (95%-CI 85.4–92.3), and an accuracy of 89.6% (95%-CI 88.1–90.9) in the differentiation between ACR A/B and ACR C/D. DCNN versus human and inter-reader agreement were both “substantial” (Cohen’s kappa: 0.61 versus 0.63). Conclusion: The DCNN allows accurate, standardized, and observer-independent classification of breast density based on the ACR BI-RADS system. Key Points: • A DCNN performs on par with human experts in breast density assessment for synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions. • The proposed technique may be useful for accurate, standardized, and observer-independent breast density evaluation of tomosynthesis.

Objective: This study trained and evaluated algorithms to detect, segment, and classify simple and complex pleural effusions on computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: For detection and segmentation, we randomly selected 160 chest CT scans out of all consecutive patients (January 2016–January 2021, n = 2659) with reported pleural effusion. Effusions were manually segmented and a negative cohort of chest CTs from 160 patients without effusions was added. A deep convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained and cross-validated (n = 224; 70%) for segmentation and tested on a separate subset (n = 96; 30%) with the same distribution of reported pleural complexity features as in the training cohort (eg, hyperdense fluid, gas, pleural thickening and loculation). On a separate consecutive cohort with a high prevalence of pleural complexity features (n = 335), a random forest model was implemented for classification of segmented effusions with Hounsfield unit thresholds, density distribution, and radiomics-based features as input. As performance measures, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curves (AUCs) for detection/classifier evaluation (per-case level) and Dice coefficient and volume analysis for the segmentation task were used. Results: Sensitivity and specificity for detection of effusion were excellent at 0.99 and 0.98, respectively (n = 96; AUC, 0.996, test data). Segmentation was robust (median Dice, 0.89; median absolute volume difference, 13 mL), irrespective of size, complexity, or contrast phase. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for classification in simple versus complex effusions were 0.67, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively. Conclusion: Using a dataset with different degrees of complexity, a robust model was developed for the detection, segmentation, and classification of effusion subtypes. The algorithms are openly available at https://github.com/usb-radiology/pleuraleffusion.git.

Computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of empyema is challenging because current literature features multiple overlapping pleural findings. We aimed to identify informative findings for structured reporting. The screening according to inclusion criteria (P: Pleural empyema, I: CT C: culture/gram-stain/pathology/pus, O: Diagnostic accuracy measures), data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of studies published between 01-1980 and 10-2021 on Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were performed independently by two reviewers. CT findings with pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals, not including 1, were considered as informative. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy for CT findings were calculated by using a bivariate random-effects model and heterogeneity sources were evaluated. Ten studies with a total of 252 patients with and 846 without empyema were included. From 119 overlapping descriptors, five informative CT findings were identified: Pleural enhancement, thickening, loculation, fat thickening, and fat stranding with an AUC of 0.80 (hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic, HSROC). Potential sources of heterogeneity were different thresholds, empyema prevalence, and study year.

Pericardial effusions (PEFs) are often missed on Computed Tomography (CT), which particularly affects the outcome of patients presenting with hemodynamic compromise. An automatic PEF detection, segmentation, and classification tool would expedite and improve CT based PEF diagnosis; 258 CTs with (206 with simple PEF, 52 with hemopericardium) and without PEF (each 134 with contrast, 124 non-enhanced) were identified using the radiology report (01/2016–01/2021). PEF were manually 3D-segmented. A deep convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained on 316 cases and separately tested on the remaining 200 and 22 external post-mortem CTs. Inter-reader variability was tested on 40 CTs. PEF classification utilized the median Hounsfield unit from each prediction. The sensitivity and specificity for PEF detection was 97% (95% CI 91.48–99.38%) and 100.00% (95% CI 96.38–100.00%) and 89.74% and 83.61% for diagnosing hemopericardium (AUC 0.944, 95% CI 0.904–0.984). Model performance (Dice coefficient: 0.75 ± 0.01) was non-inferior to inter-reader (0.69 ± 0.02) and was unaffected by contrast administration nor alternative chest pathology (p > 0.05). External dataset testing yielded similar results. Our model reliably detects, segments, and classifies PEF on CT in a complex dataset, potentially serving as an alert tool whilst enhancing report quality. The model and corresponding datasets are publicly available.

For AI-based classification tasks in computed tomography (CT), a reference standard for evaluating the clinical diagnostic accuracy of individual classes is essential. To enable the implementation of an AI tool in clinical practice, the raw data should be drawn from clinical routine data using state-of-the-art scanners, evaluated in a blinded manner and verified with a reference test. Three hundred and thirty-five consecutive CTs, performed between 1 January 2016 and 1 January 2021 with reported pleural effusion and pathology reports from thoracocentesis or biopsy within 7 days of the CT were retrospectively included. Two radiologists (4 and 10 PGY) blindly assessed the chest CTs for pleural CT features. If needed, consensus was achieved using an experienced radiologist’s opinion (29 PGY). In addition, diagnoses were extracted from written radiological reports. We analyzed these findings for a possible correlation with the following patient outcomes: mortality and median hospital stay. For AI prediction, we used an approach consisting of nnU-Net segmentation, PyRadiomics features and a random forest model. Specificity and sensitivity for CT-based detection of empyema (n = 81 of n = 335 patients) were 90.94 (95%-CI: 86.55–94.05) and 72.84 (95%-CI: 61.63–81.85%) in all effusions, with moderate to almost perfect interrater agreement for all pleural findings associated with empyema (Cohen’s kappa = 0.41–0.82). Highest accuracies were found for pleural enhancement or thickening with 87.02% and 81.49%, respectively. For empyema prediction, AI achieved a specificity and sensitivity of 74.41% (95% CI: 68.50–79.57) and 77.78% (95% CI: 66.91–85.96), respectively. Empyema was associated with a longer hospital stay (median = 20 versus 14 days), and findings consistent with pleural carcinomatosis impacted mortality.