Michelle Hook

Dr. Michelle Hook

Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 8447 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2011 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESE.R. Strickland
E.R. Strickland
Michelle HookMichelle Hook
Michelle Hook
SBS. Balaraman
S. Balaraman
JHJ.R. Huie
J.R. Huie
JGJ.W. Grau
J.W. Grau
RMRajesh Miranda
Rajesh Miranda

1 January 2016 in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSioui Maldonado-Bouchard
Sioui Maldonado-Bouchard
KPKelsey Peters
Kelsey Peters
SWSarah A. Woller
Sarah A. Woller
BMBehrouz Madahian
Behrouz Madahian
UFUsef Faghihi
Usef Faghihi
Michelle HookMichelle Hook
Michelle Hook

1 December 1998 in Neuropsychologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michelle HookMichelle Hook
Michelle Hook
LRLesley Rogers
Lesley Rogers

1 January 2004 in Behavioral Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHWilliam D. Hopkins
William D. Hopkins
MWMichael J. Wesley
Michael J. Wesley
MIM. Kay Izard
M. Kay Izard
Michelle HookMichelle Hook
Michelle Hook
SSSteven J Schapiro
Steven J Schapiro
Population-level right-handedness has historically been considered a hallmark of human evolution. Even though recent studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have demonstrated population-level right-handedness for certain behaviors, some have questioned the validity and consistency of these findings by arguing that reported laterality effects are specific to certain colonies of apes and to those chimpanzees reared by humans. The authors report evidence of population-level right-handedness in 3 separate colonies of chimpanzees. Moreover, handedness in the 3 colonies was unrelated to the proportion of subjects that were raised by humans. This is the strongest evidence to date that population-level handedness is evident in chimpanzees and is not an artifact of human rearing.

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAdam R Ferguson
Adam R Ferguson
JHJ. Russell Huie
J. Russell Huie
ECEric D. Crown
Eric D. Crown
Kyle BaumbauerKyle Baumbauer
Kyle Baumbauer
Michelle HookMichelle Hook
Michelle Hook
JGJames W. Grau
James W. Grau
Synaptic plasticity within the spinal cord has great potential to facilitate recovery of function after spinal cord injury (SCI). Spinal plasticity can be induced in an activity-dependent manner even without input from the brain after complete SCI. A mechanistic basis for these effects is provided by research demonstrating that spinal synapses have many of the same plasticity mechanisms that are known to underlie learning and memory in the brain. In addition, the lumbar spinal cord can sustain several forms of learning and memory, including limb-position training. However, not all spinal plasticity promotes recovery of function. Central sensitization of nociceptive (pain) pathways in the spinal cord may emerge in response to various noxious inputs, demonstrating that plasticity within the spinal cord may contribute to maladaptive pain states. In this review we discuss interactions between adaptive and maladaptive forms of activity-dependent plasticity in the spinal cord below the level of SCI. The literature demonstrates that activity-dependent plasticity within the spinal cord must be carefully tuned to promote adaptive spinal training. Prior work from our group has shown that stimulation that is delivered in a limb position-dependent manner or on a fixed interval can induce adaptive plasticity that promotes future spinal cord learning and reduces nociceptive hyper-reactivity. On the other hand, stimulation that is delivered in an unsynchronized fashion, such as randomized electrical stimulation or peripheral skin injuries, can generate maladaptive spinal plasticity that undermines future spinal cord learning, reduces recovery of locomotor function, and promotes nociceptive hyper-reactivity after SCI. We review these basic phenomena, how these findings relate to the broader spinal plasticity literature, discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms, and finally discuss implications of these and other findings for improved rehabilitative therapies after SCI.

15 June 2014 in Journal of Neurotrauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKelsey Luedtke
Kelsey Luedtke
SBSioui Maldonado Bouchard
Sioui Maldonado Bouchard
SWSarah A. Woller
Sarah A. Woller
MFMary Katherine Funk
Mary Katherine Funk
MAMiriam Aceves
Miriam Aceves
Michelle HookMichelle Hook
Michelle Hook
Despite an increased incidence of depression in patients after spinal cord injury (SCI), there is no animal model of depression after SCI. To address this, we used a battery of established tests to assess depression after a rodent contusion injury. Subjects were acclimated to the tasks, and baseline scores were collected before SCI. Testing was conducted on days 9-10 (acute) and 19-20 (chronic) postinjury. To categorize depression, subjects' scores on each behavioral measure were averaged across the acute and chronic stages of injury and subjected to a principal component analysis. This analysis revealed a two-component structure, which explained 72.2% of between-subjects variance. The data were then analyzed with a hierarchical cluster analysis, identifying two clusters that differed significantly on the sucrose preference, open field, social exploration, and burrowing tasks. One cluster (9 of 26 subjects) displayed characteristics of depression. Using these data, a discriminant function analysis was conducted to derive an equation that could classify subjects as "depressed" on days 9-10. The discriminant function was used in a second experiment examining whether the depression-like symptoms could be reversed with the antidepressant, fluoxetine. Fluoxetine significantly decreased immobility in the forced swim test (FST) in depressed subjects identified with the equation. Subjects that were depressed and treated with saline displayed significantly increased immobility on the FST, relative to not depressed, saline-treated controls. These initial experiments validate our tests of depression, generating a powerful model system for further understanding the relationships between molecular changes induced by SCI and the development of depression.