Objective: To examine changes that occur in infant and parent salivary oxytocin (OT) and salivary cortisol (SC) levels during skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and whether SSC alleviates parental stress and anxiety while also supporting mother–father–infant relationships. Methods: This randomized crossover study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with a sample of 28 stable preterm infants and their parents. Saliva samples were collected from infants, mothers, and fathers on Days 1 and 2 (1/parent) for OT and cortisol measurement pre-SSC, during a 60-min SSC session, and a 45-min post-SSC. Parental anxiety was measured at the same time points. Parent–infant interaction was examined prior to discharge on Day 3 via video for synchrony and responsiveness using Dyadic Mutuality Coding. Results: Salivary OT levels increased significantly during SSC for mothers ( p < .001), fathers ( p < .002), and infants ( p < .002). Infant SC levels decreased significantly ( p < .001) during SSC as compared to before and after SSC. Parent anxiety scores were significantly related to parent OT and SC levels. Parents with higher OT levels exhibited more synchrony and responsiveness ( p < .001) in their infant interactions. Conclusion: This study addresses a gap in understanding the mechanisms linking parent–infant contact to biobehavioral responses. SSC activated OT release and decreased infant SC levels. Facilitation of SSC may be an effective intervention to reduce parent and infant stress in the NICU. Findings advance the exploration of OT as a potential moderator for improving responsiveness and synchrony in parent–infant interactions.

Background: Benefits of exclusive human milk diets for preterm and low birth-weight infants are well established. Despite known benefits, supporting mothers in the provision of mother's own milk for high-risk infants is challenging. Lactation support in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is highly variable. Lactations consultants (LCs) are often shared between postpartum units and the NICU, potentially increasing LC workload with less time spent with high-risk mothers. Furthermore, less than half of NICUs in the United States staff an international board-certified lactation consultant. Limited understanding exists regarding impacts of NICU-specific lactation support on breastfeeding outcomes. Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based practice brief is to synthesize the literature on the impact of NICU-specific lactation support, LCs who work exclusively in the NICU, and provide guidance about how NICU staffing with LCs solely focused on supporting mothers of high-risk infants impacts breastfeeding outcomes for low birth-weight infants. Search Strategy: CINAHL PLUS, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and OVID databases were searched using key words and restricted to English language. Findings: During hospitalization, NICUs staffed with dedicated board-certified LCs have increased potential to yield improved breastfeeding rates through hospital discharge, increased proportion of infants who receive mother's own milk, and increased duration of breastfeeding or human milk expression through hospital discharge. Implications for Practice: Human milk nutrition is related to improved outcomes for high-risk infants. Neonatal intensive care unit–specific lactation support can potentially optimize maternal breastfeeding practices and improve outcomes for high-risk infants. Implications for Research: There is a need for further studies pertaining to NICU-specific lactation consultants and influences on breastfeeding outcomes.

Background: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a multifaceted, technology-driven high stress environment for professionals, infants and families. Purpose: Examine healthcare professionals' beliefs and perceptions regarding providing FCC within the context of NICU. Methods: This exploratory descriptive study used an online-survey format. The survey comprised several instruments including the Perceived Stress Scale, symptoms of burnout subscale from the Professional Quality of Life scale, and the Family Nurse Caring Belief Scale (FNCBS). Demographic and open-ended items were also included. Results: Sample consisted of 115 multidisciplinary participants working in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Participants report strong levels of FCC beliefs. Participants strongly agreed (82%) or agreed (18%) that no matter how sick the infant is, he or she needs to be treated as an individual. A significant correlation (r=−0.343, P < .001) exists between participant's stress composite score and FNCBS composite score. There were significant relationships between participant's years of experience (F = 5.35, P < .002) and education levels (F = 2.60, P < .05) and higher FNCBS composite scores. There were also significant relationships between participant's years of experience (F = 4.77, P < .004) and education (F = 2.89, P < .039) with higher Perceived Stress Scale composite scores. Implications for Practice: Results suggest that while participants agreed that FCC is important, they also believed that inadequate staffing and inappropriate assignments may lead to rationing of care. Implications for Research: Further research is needed to explore factors that lead to rationing of FCC.