Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection is the most common sexually transmitted disease and the leading cause of cervical cancer. The undeniable causal link between HPV and cervical cancer led to the creation of HPV prophylactic vaccines. Health professionals are key in counseling parents about their children's immunization, as they are considered valid and reliable sources of information. The systematic review aimed to determine doctors' and nurses' knowledge of HPV, their awareness of the vaccine, and their willingness to accept vaccination. Systematic studies were conducted from 2015 to January 2022 in Medline/PubMed and Google Scholar online databases. The systematic review included 10 good-quality cross-sectional studies and a total of 6700 participants who were administered self-administered questionnaires or personal interviews. From the analysis of most of the studies, it is demonstrated that health professionals have a satisfactory level of knowledge about HPV infection and its effects on human health, even if their knowledge gap in essential details regarding the virus and HPV vaccination is apparent. It was found that various factors regarding health professionals, such as their specialty, gender, working environment, weekly working hours, and the interval since their last HPV training, contribute to forming their knowledge level about HPV and vaccination. In addition, most studies show that most healthcare professionals knew about the existence of HPV vaccines but did not know many details about how their work and their potential benefits. In conclusion, the provision of counseling by health professionals is currently estimated to be the strongest predictor of target group compliance with the HPV vaccine. Consequently, it is essentially considered to investigate the HPV-related knowledge level among health workers and to intensively reeducate them regarding the HPV infection risks and the necessity of HPV vaccination to improve their awareness and strengthen their attitude in favor of vaccination against cervical cancer.

Background: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the role of health education among young adolescents, regarding their level of knowledge about the HPV and the acceptance of the HPV vaccination, with the aim of increasing vaccination coverage, in Trikala city, mainland of Greece. Methods: This study included high school students from all public and private schools of Trikala city. Questionnaires related to knowledge regarding the HPV infection and HPV vaccination were administered in three phases. In the first phase of the study, the questionnaires were completed by the entire study population. During the second and third phases, the completion of the questionnaires concerned only the population that received the intervention (interactive seminars). The second and third phase questionnaires were completed immediately after the interactive seminar and three months later, respectively. The statistical analysis of the results was performed using IBM SPSS 20.0 statistical program. Results: A total of 434 female students completed the questionnaire (response rate 76.26%). Most participants (66.6%) were females. The questionnaires evaluated the respondents’ awareness of the HPV infection. The results show that the percentage of the participants who stated that they “do not know” what HPV is decreased from 44.4% (first phase), to 1.6% (second phase), and 8.1% (third phase). Similarly, the willingness to accept the HPV vaccine increased from 71% (first phase), to 89.1% (second phase), and 83.5% (third phase). Conclusions: The present study shows that targeted interactive informational interventions in the school environment leads to a statistically significant increase in both the level of knowledge about HPV and the willingness of young adolescent students to be vaccinated against cervical cancer.

Large cervical leiomyomas (≥10cm) are extremely rare. Our case report concerns the surgical treatment of a patient with a large cervical leiomyoma associated with chronic pelvic pain, bilateral hydroureteronephrosis and significant impairment of renal function. A 47-year-old patient of reproductive age with a normal menstrual cycle and a medical history of chronic pelvic pain presented to the gynecology clinic for examination. Clinically, the presence of a large pelvic mass was found, the upper margins of which were palpable at the level of the umbilicus. A preoperative assessment revealed bilateral hydroureteronephrosis due to obstructive uropathy and renal dysfunction. Hydroureteronephrosis, as a consequence of the large pelvic mass, probably originating from the cervix of the uterus, was evaluated as the main cause of renal dysfunction. Tumor markers were negative. The imaging studies confirmed the clinical diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma, and the surgical treatment of the patient with laparotomy was decided. Intraoperatively, the presence of a large uterine cervical fibroid was detected, and a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy were performed. Operating was difficult, with significant surgical difficulties. The postoperative course was uneventful, without immediate complications. The patient's symptom relief began gradually, immediately after surgery. Three months after surgery, the patient reported complete relief of her pelvic pain. A re-examination of the urinary tract revealed complete recovery of renal morphology and function. In the paper, after the presentation of the case, a brief review of cervical leiomyomas is attempted based on the literature, mainly regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscle is an extremely rare form of extrapelvic localization of the disease. It is usually iatrogenic and develops after caesarean section or gynecological surgery. Preoperative diagnosis is very difficult and a challenge for gynecologists and surgeons; thus, the diagnosis is histological. The treatment of choice consists of wide local excision of the lesion on healthy margins. We cite a case of isolated endometriosis in the rectus abdominis muscles in a 46-year-old patient with a previous caesarean section, the diagnosis of which was made randomly when performing abdominal total hysterectomy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Histological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed the diagnosis. Simultaneously, the surgical specimen of the uterus and ovaries was free of endometriosis. Postoperatively the patient mentioned discharge of her symptoms. No further therapeutic intervention was deemed necessary, as it was considered that a complete resection of the endometrial tissue implantation from the muscles of abdominal wall was performed. The present case report lay emphasis on the significant difficulties involved in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscle. Concurrently, it is pointed out that, despite its rarity, individual extrapelvic endometriosis located in the rectus abdominis muscle should be included among other pathological entities in the differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain in women of reproductive age, who gave birth by caesarean section or underwent gynecological surgery with abdominal or laparoscopic access.

Background/Objectives: Tubal dysfunction may be a contributing factor in up to 35% of infertility cases, rendering tubal patency assessment a vital component of the infertility workup. In this review we examined the diagnostic efficacy and tolerability of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and compared it to hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). Methods: Online databases were systematically searched and evaluated according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and inter-method agreement were evaluated, along with mean pain scores. Results: This analysis included data from 9 studies and 1354 patients with conclusive diagnostic data from 2422 tubes and 1294 patients with data on intra-procedural pain. With regard to HyFoSy and HyCoSy comparison, pooled sensitivity was 87% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.074), while pooled specificity was 95% and 85%, respectively, favoring HyFoSy (p < 0.001). HyFoSy was more tolerable with regard to pain, but this was not statistically significant. Regarding the HyFoSy and HSG comparison, pooled Cohen’s k was 0.38, indicating fair-moderate agreement. In subsequent analysis, with HSG as a reference standard, HyFoSy demonstrated low sensitivity (61%) but high specificity (87%). With regard to experienced pain, HyFoSy and HSG had a difference of 2.4 units on a 10-point scale, favoring HyFoSy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: HyFoSy was superior to HyCoSy and may be used as a first-line tubal assessment method, with HSG being utilized in inconclusive cases. However, further research is still required due to the small number of available studies.