Surfactant administration incorporates liquid bolus instillation via endotracheal tube catheter and use of a mechanical ventilator. Aerosolized surfactant has generated interest and conflicting data related to dose requirements and efficacy. We hypothesized that aerosolized surfactant with a novel breath-actuated vibrating mesh nebulizer would have similar efficacy and safety as instilled surfactant. Juvenile rabbits (1.50 ± 0.20 kg, n = 17) were sedated, anesthetized, intubated, and surfactant was depleted via lung lavage on mechanical ventilation. Subjects were randomized to receive standard dose liquid instillation via catheter (n = 5); low dose surfactant (n = 5) and standard dose surfactant (n = 5) via aerosol; and descriptive controls (no treatment, n = 2). Peridosing events, disease severity and gas exchange, were recorded every 30 min for 3 h following surfactant administration. Direct-Instillation group had higher incidence for peridosing events than aerosol. Standard dose liquid and aerosol groups had greater PaO2 from pre-treatment baseline following surfactant (p < 0.05) with greater ventilation efficiency with aerosol (p < 0.05). Our study showed similar improvement in oxygenation response with greater ventilation efficiency with aerosol than liquid bolus administration at the same dose with fewer peridosing events. Breath-synchronized aerosol via nebulizer has potential as a safe, effective, and economical alternative to bolus liquid surfactant instillation.
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to the need for developing effective respiratory support that can be rapidly implemented during critical surge capacity scenarios in healthcare settings. Lung support with bubble continuous positive airway pressure (B-CPAP) is a well-established therapeutic approach for supporting neonatal patients. However, the effectiveness of B-CPAP in larger pediatric and adult patients has not been addressed. Using similar principles of B-CPAP pressure generation, application of intermittent positive pressure inflations above CPAP could support gas exchange and high work of breathing levels in larger patients experiencing more severe forms of respiratory failure. This report describes the design and performance characteristics of the BubbleVent, a novel 3D-printed valve system that combined with commonly found tubes, hoses, and connectors can provide intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) suitable for adult mechanical ventilation without direct electrification. Testing of the BubbleVent was performed on a passive adult test lung model and compared with a critical care ventilator commonly used in tertiary care centers. The BubbleVent was shown to deliver stable PIP and PEEP levels, as well as timing control of breath delivery that was comparable with a critical care ventilator.
Acute lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of death in individuals under the age of 5 years, mostly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The lack of respiratory support systems contributes to the poor outcomes. Bubble CPAP is widely used for non-invasive respiratory support, but sicker children often require support over what CPAP provides in the form of BiPAP. We developed and tested a simple bubble-based bilevel ventilator (Bubble bi-vent) and compared it with a standard care BiPAP device. The bubble bilevel device consisted of a single tube submerged in a water-sealed column to maintain end-expiratory positive airway pressure. It moves vertically via an electric motor to also provide inspiratory positive airway pressure for augmentation of lung volumes, with the duration and frequency of breaths controlled by a microprocessor. We tested this novel device in passively breathing mechanical lung models for infants and small children. We compared pressure and tidal volume delivery between the novel device and a Trilogy BiPAP ventilator. The results showed that the Bubble bi-vent could deliver set pressures in a mechanical lung and was comparable to a standard Trilogy ventilator. While two different bubble-based bilevel pressure devices have been piloted for neonates and adults, our results demonstrate the feasibility of bubble bilevel ventilation for infants and small children with moderate to severe lung disease for whom this was previously not described.