Takashi Ueda

Dr. Takashi Ueda

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2022 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKazuaki Matsumoto
Kazuaki Matsumoto
KOKazutaka Oda
Kazutaka Oda
KSKensuke Shoji
Kensuke Shoji
YHYuki Hanai
Yuki Hanai
YTYoshiko Takahashi
Yoshiko Takahashi
YTYoshio Takesue
Yoshio Takesue
Background: To promote model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) for vancomycin (VCM), we developed statements for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods: Ten clinical questions were selected. The committee conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis as well as clinical studies to establish recommendations for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing. Results: AUC-guided dosing tended to more strongly decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) than trough-guided dosing, and a lower risk of treatment failure was demonstrated for higher AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios (cut-off of 400). Higher AUCs (cut-off of 600 μg·h/mL) significantly increased the risk of AKI. Although Bayesian estimation with two-point measurement was recommended, the trough concentration alone may be used in patients with mild infections in whom VCM was administered with q12h. To increase the concentration on days 1–2, the routine use of a loading dose is required. TDM on day 2 before steady state is reached should be considered to optimize the dose in patients with serious infections and a high risk of AKI. Conclusions: These VCM TDM guidelines provide recommendations based on MIPD to increase treatment response while preventing adverse effects.

1 January 2014 in Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TUTakashi Ueda
Takashi Ueda
YTYoshio Takesue
Yoshio Takesue
KNKazuhiko Nakajima
Kazuhiko Nakajima
KIKaoru Ichki
Kaoru Ichki
YWYasunao Wada
Yasunao Wada
HIHiroki Ikeuchi
Hiroki Ikeuchi

8 June 2020 in Mycoses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yukihiro HamadaYukihiro Hamada
Yukihiro Hamada
TUTakashi Ueda
Takashi Ueda
YMYoshitsugu Miyazaki
Yoshitsugu Miyazaki
KNKazuhiko Nakajima
Kazuhiko Nakajima
KFKeiko Fukunaga
Keiko Fukunaga
YTYoshio Takesue
Yoshio Takesue
Summary: Background: Hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms are common adverse effects (AEs) of voriconazole therapy.Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the effects of treatment modification based on therapeutic drug monitoring on AEs in patients undergoing voriconazole therapy.Methods: The target voriconazole trough concentration (Cmin) was 1‐5 µg/mL. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine Cmin cut‐offs for AEs.Results: A total of 401 patients were included. Among 108 patients with high initial Cmin, voriconazole was discontinued in 32 and the dose was reduced in 71. Among 44 patients with low initial Cmin, voriconazole was discontinued in 4 and the dose was increased in 19. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 6.0% of patients, after a median of 10 days. Visual symptoms were evident in 9.5% of patients after a median of 4 days. Initial Cmin was significantly associated with visual symptoms but not hepatotoxicity, which suggested the effect of treatment modification on hepatotoxicity. However, both hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms were significantly correlated with Cmin at the onset of AEs, and the Cmin cut‐offs were 3.5 μg/mL for hepatotoxicity and 4.2 μg/mL for visual symptoms. Voriconazole was discontinued after the occurrence of AEs in 62.5% of patients with hepatotoxicity but only 26.3% of patients with visual symptoms. With dose adjustment, treatment was completed in 8/9 patients with hepatotoxicity and 27/28 patients with visual symptoms.Conclusions: A significant preventive effect was demonstrated on hepatotoxicity, but not on visual symptoms because of earlier occurrence. With treatment modification after the occurrence of AEs, most patients completed therapy.

23 May 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TUTakashi Ueda
Takashi Ueda
YTYoshio Takesue
Yoshio Takesue
ITIssei Tokimatsu
Issei Tokimatsu
TMTaiga Miyazaki
Taiga Miyazaki
NNNana Nakada-Motokawa
Nana Nakada-Motokawa
YMYoshitsugu Miyazaki
Yoshitsugu Miyazaki
The incidence of ocular candidiasis (OC) in patients with candidemia varies across different reports, and the issue of whether routine ophthalmoscopy improves outcomes has been raised. This study investigated the incidence of OC and evaluate whether the extent of OC impacts the clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included non-neutropenic patients with candidemia who underwent treatment at one of 15 medical centers between 2010 and 2016. Chorioretinitis without other possible causes for the ocular lesions and endophthalmitis was classified as a probable OC. If signs of chorioretinitis were observed in patients with a systemic disease that causes similar ocular lesions, they were classified as a possible OC. In total, 781 of 1089 patients with candidemia underwent an ophthalmic examination. The prevalence of OC was 19.5%. The time from the collection of a positive blood culture to the initial ophthalmic examination was 5.0 ± 3.9 days in patients with OC. The leading isolate was Candida albicans (77.9%). Possible OC was associated with unsuccessful treatments (resolution of ocular findings) (odds ratio: 0.354, 95% confidence interval: 0.141–0.887), indicating an overdiagnosis in patients with a possible OC. If these patients were excluded, the incidence fell to 12.8%. Endophthalmitis and/or macular involvement, both of which require aggressive therapy, were detected in 43.1% of patients; a significantly higher incidence of visual symptoms was observed in these patients. Even when early routine ophthalmic examinations were performed, a high incidence of advanced ocular lesions was observed. These results suggest that routine ophthalmic examinations are still warranted in patients with candidemia.

9 June 2016 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TUTakashi Ueda
Takashi Ueda
YTY. Takesue
Y. Takesue
KNK. Nakajima
K. Nakajima
KIK. Ichiki
K. Ichiki
ADA. Doita
A. Doita
TKT. Kimura
T. Kimura

13 January 2022 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TUTakashi Ueda
Takashi Ueda
YTYoshio Takesue
Yoshio Takesue
KNKazuhiko Nakajima
Kazuhiko Nakajima
KIKaoru Ichiki
Kaoru Ichiki
KIKaori Ishikawa
Kaori Ishikawa
TKTakeshi Kimura
Takeshi Kimura
Area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)-guided vancomycin treatment is associated with decreased nephrotoxicity. It is preferable to obtain two samples to estimate the AUC. This study examined the usefulness of AUC estimation via trough concentration (Cmin)-only sampling of 260 adults infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) who received vancomycin. The exact Cmin sampling time was used for Bayesian estimation. A significantly higher early treatment response was observed in patients with a day 2 AUC ≥ 400 µg·h/mL than those with <400 µg·h/mL, and a significantly higher early nephrotoxicity rate was observed in patients with a day 2 AUC ≥ 600 µg·h/mL than those with <600 µg·h/mL. These AUC cutoff values constituted independent factors for each outcome. In sub-analysis, the discrimination ability for early clinical outcomes using these AUC cutoffs was confirmed only in patients with q12 vancomycin administration. A significant difference in early treatment response using the 400 µg·h/mL cutoff was obtained only in patients with low-risk infections. The usefulness of the vancomycin AUC target to decrease nephrotoxicity while assuring clinical efficacy was even confirmed with a single Cmin measurement. However, assessment with two samples might be required in patients with q24 administration or high/moderate-risk MRSA infections.