Miguel Minhalma

Dr. Miguel Minhalma

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stefan BeislStefan Beisl
Stefan Beisl
Silvia MonteiroSilvia Monteiro
Silvia Monteiro
RSRicardo Santos
Ricardo Santos
AFAna Sofia Figueiredo
Ana Sofia Figueiredo
MSMaría Guadalupe Sánchez-Loredo
María Guadalupe Sánchez-Loredo
Maria Norberta De PinhoMaria Norberta De Pinho
Maria Norberta De Pinho

10 November 2001 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMiguel Minhalma
Miguel Minhalma
Maria Norberta De PinhoMaria Norberta De Pinho
Maria Norberta De Pinho

1 March 2001 in Separation and Purification Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMiguel Minhalma
Miguel Minhalma
Maria Norberta De PinhoMaria Norberta De Pinho
Maria Norberta De Pinho

1 April 2008 in Journal of Membrane Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIsabel Catarino
Isabel Catarino
MMMiguel Minhalma
Miguel Minhalma
LBLademir L. Beal
Lademir L. Beal
Marília MateusMarília Mateus
Marília Mateus
Maria Norberta De PinhoMaria Norberta De Pinho
Maria Norberta De Pinho

1 January 2011 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMarisa Bernardo
Marisa Bernardo
ASAna Santos
Ana Santos
PCPaula Cantinho
Paula Cantinho
MMMiguel Minhalma
Miguel Minhalma

19 August 2023 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexandre GiacobboAlexandre Giacobbo
Alexandre Giacobbo
IPIsabella Franco Pasqualotto
Isabella Franco Pasqualotto
RFRafael Cabeleira de Coronel Machado Filho
Rafael Cabeleira de Coronel Machado Filho
MMMiguel Minhalma
Miguel Minhalma
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDESANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
Maria Norberta De PinhoMaria Norberta De Pinho
Maria Norberta De Pinho
The present work investigates nanofiltration (NF) and ultrafiltration (UF) for the removal of three widely used pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs), namely atenolol, sulfamethoxazole, and rosuvastatin. Four membranes, two polyamide NF membranes (NF90 and NF270) and two polyethersulfone UF membranes (XT and ST), were evaluated in terms of productivity (permeate flux) and selectivity (rejection of PhACs) at pressures from 2 to 8 bar. Although the UF membranes have a much higher molecular weight cut-off (1000 and 10,000 Da), when compared to the molecular weight of the PhACs (253–482 Da), moderate rejections were observed. For UF, rejections were dependent on the molecular weight and charge of the PhACs, membrane molecular weight cut-off (MWCO), and operating pressure, demonstrating that electrostatic interactions play an important role in the removal of PhACs, especially at low operating pressures. On the other hand, both NF membranes displayed high rejections for all PhACs studied (75–98%). Hence, considering the optimal operating conditions, the NF270 membrane (MWCO = 400 Da) presented the best performance, achieving permeate fluxes of about 100 kg h−1 m−2 and rejections above 80% at a pressure of 8 bar, that is, a productivity of about twice that of the NF90 membrane (MWCO = 200 Da). Therefore, NF270 was the most suitable membrane for this application, although the tight UF membranes under low operating pressures displayed satisfactory results.