Decoupled data and control planes in Software Defined Networks (SDN) allow them to handle an increasing number of threats by limiting harmful network links at the switching stage. As storage, high-end servers, and network devices, Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is designed to replace purpose-built network elements with VNFs (Virtualized Network Functions). A Software Defined Network Function Virtualization (SDNFV) network is designed in this paper to boost network performance. Stateful firewall services are deployed as VNFs in the SDN network in this article to offer security and boost network scalability. The SDN controller’s role is to develop a set of guidelines and rules to avoid hazardous network connectivity. Intruder assaults that employ numerous socket addresses cannot be adequately protected by these strategies. Machine learning algorithms are trained using traditional network threat intelligence data to identify potentially malicious linkages and probable attack targets. Based on conventional network data (DT), Bayesian Network (BayesNet), Naive-Bayes, C4.5, and Decision Table (DT) algorithms are used to predict the target host that will be attacked. The experimental results shows that the Bayesian Network algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 92.87%, Native–Bayes Algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 87.81%, C4.5 Algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 84.92%, and the Decision Tree algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 83.18%. There were 451 k login attempts from 178 different countries, with over 70 k source IP addresses and 40 k source port addresses recorded in a large dataset from nine honeypot servers.

Software Defined Network (SDN) cut down the monopolies of producing network devices and their applications. It allows the use of an omniscient controller that manages the overall network and promises for simplifying the configuration and management burden of the traditional Internet Protocol (IP) network. The use of hardware load balancer is a critical issue in conventional IP networks that creates many negative impacts such as the cost affordability, features customization, and availability. Also, the existing load balancing algorithm does not consider the flow size generated by the client nodes. Further, flows are not classified based on the threshold value of the dynamic flow size. The paper proposes to compare the performance of two load balancing algorithms such as flow-based load balancing algorithm and traffic pattern-based load balancing algorithm with distributed controllers' architecture. The result shows that the flow-based load balancing algorithm minimizes response time by 94%, enhances transaction rate by 14% and Traffic pattern-based load balancing algorithm has improved availability by 2.69%.

Software-defined networking (SDN) is a network approach achieved by decoupling of the control and data planes. The control plane is logically centralized and the data plane is distributed across the network elements. The real-time network is in need of the incorporation of distributed controllers to maintain distributed state information of the traffic flows. Software-based solutions aid distributed SDN controllers to handle fluctuating network traffic and the controller’s configurations are dynamically programmed in real time. In this study, SDN controllers were programmed with a stateful firewall application to provide firewall functionalities without the support of committed hardware. A stateful firewall filtered traffic based on the complete context of incoming packets; it continuously evaluated the entire context of traffic flows, looking for network entry rather than specific traffic flows. In addition, a flow-based scheduling module was implemented in the distributed controllers to improve network scalability. A network cluster was configured with three distributed controllers and we experimented with three independent network topologies. The performance of the proposed network model was evaluated by measuring and analyzing metrics such as network throughput (kbps), delay (ms) and network overhead (pkt/ms) for various combinations of controllers and topologies. The results of the analysis were determined using the mininet emulator. The findings of the performance evaluation indicate that the distributed SDN controllers performs better than a centralized controller. When comparing distributed SDN with two controllers and distributed SDN with three controllers the overall network throughput is increased by 64%, the delay is decreased by 43% and network overhead is reduced by 39%.

As the number of social networking sites grows, so do cyber dangers. Cyberbullying is harmful behavior that uses technology to intimidate, harass, or harm someone, often on social media platforms like 𝕏 (formerly known as Twitter). Machine learning is the optimal approach for cyberbullying detection on 𝕏 to process large amounts of data, identify patterns of offensive behavior, and automate the detection process for corpus of tweets. To identify cyber threats using a trained model, the boosted ensemble (BE) technique is assessed with various machine learning algorithms such as the convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), naive Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), bidirectional LSTM (BILSTM), recurrent neural network LSTM (RNN-LSTM), multi-modal cyberbullying detection (MMCD), and random forest (RF). These classifiers are trained on the vectorized data to classify the tweets to identify cyberbullying threats. The proposed framework can detect cyberbullying cases precisely on tweets. The significance of the work lies in detecting and mitigating cyber threats in real time, and it impacts in enhancing the safety and well-being of social media users by reducing instances of cyberbullying and other cyber threats. The comparative analysis is done using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, and the comparison results show that the BE technique outperforms other compared algorithms with its overall performance. Respectively, the accuracy rates of CNN, LSTM, NB, DT, SVM, RF, BILSTM, and BE are 92.5%, 93.5%, 84.6%, 88%, 89.3%, 92%, 93.75%, and 96%; precision rates of CNN, LSTM, NB, DT, SVM, RF, RNN-LSTM, and BE are 90.2%, 91.3%, 88%, 85%, 86%, 91.6%, 92.1%, and 94%; recall rates of CNN, LSTM, NB, DT, SVM, RF, BILSTM, and BE are 89.8%, 90.7%, 90%, 82%, 88.67%, 89%, 91.04%, and 93.7%; and F1-scores of CNN, LSTM, NB, DT, SVM, RF, MMCD, and BE are 90.6%, 91.8%, 85%, 84.56% 87.2%, 90%, 84.6%, and 94.89%.