Kalev Jogiste

Prof. Kalev Jogiste

Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Friedrich Reinhold Kreutzwaldi 1, Tartu, Estonia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in Annals of Forest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEkaterina Shorohova
Ekaterina Shorohova
TKTimo Kuuluvainen
Timo Kuuluvainen
AKAhto Kangur
Ahto Kangur
Kalev JogisteKalev Jogiste
Kalev Jogiste

21 February 2017 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kalev JogisteKalev Jogiste
Kalev Jogiste
HKHenn Korjus
Henn Korjus
JSJohn A. Stanturf
John A. Stanturf
Lee FrelichLee Frelich
Lee Frelich
EBEndijs Baders
Endijs Baders
FVFloortje Vodde
Floortje Vodde
The condition of forest ecosystems depends on the temporal and spatial pattern of management interventions and natural disturbances. Remnants of previous conditions persisting after disturbances, or ecosystem legacies, collectively comprise ecosystem memory. Ecosystem memory in turn contributes to resilience and possibilities of ecosystem reorganization following further disturbance. Understanding the role of disturbance and legacies is a prerequisite for maintaining resilience in the face of global change. Several legacy concepts discussed in the peer‐reviewed literature, including disturbance, biological, soil, land‐use, and silvicultural legacies, overlap in complex ways. Here, we review these established legacy concepts and propose that the new terms “material legacy” (individuals or matter, e.g., survivors, coarse woody debris, nutrients left after disturbance) and “information legacy” (adaptations to historical disturbance regimes) cut across these previous concepts and lead to a new classification of legacies. This includes six categories: material legacies with above‐ and belowground, and biotic and abiotic categories, and information legacies with above‐ and belowground categories. These six legacies are influenced by differential patterns of editing and conditioning by “legacy syndromes” that result from natural or human‐manipulated disturbance regimes that can be arranged along a gradient of naturalness. This scheme is applied to a case study of hemiboreal forests in the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, where natural disturbance, traditional clearcut silviculture, and afforestation of abandoned agricultural lands constitute the three main legacy syndromes. These legacy syndromes in turn influence forest response to management actions and constrain resilience, leading to a mosaic of natural, manipulated, and artificial (novel) ecosystems across the landscape, depending on how the legacies in each syndrome affect ecological memory.

1 June 2011 in Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Meelis SeedreMeelis Seedre
Meelis Seedre
BSBharat M. Shrestha
Bharat M. Shrestha
HCHan Chen
Han Chen
SCSteve Colombo
Steve Colombo
Kalev JogisteKalev Jogiste
Kalev Jogiste
Boreal forest carbon (C) storage and sequestration is a critical element for global C management and is largely disturbance driven. The disturbance regime can be natural or anthropogenic with varying intensity and frequency that differ temporally and spatially the boreal forest. The objective of this review was to synthesize the literature on C dynamics of North American boreal forests after most common disturbances, stand replacing wildfire and clearcut logging. Forest ecosystem C is stored in four major pools: live biomass, dead biomass, organic soil horizons, and mineral soil. Carbon cycling among these pools is inter-related and largely determined by disturbance type and time since disturbance. Following a stand replacing disturbance, (1) live biomass increases rapidly leading to the maximal biomass stage, then stabilizes or slightly declines at old-growth or gap dynamics stage at which late-successional tree species dominate the stand; (2) dead woody material carbon generally follows a U-shaped pattern during succession; (3) forest floor carbon increases throughout stand development; and (4) mineral soil carbon appears to be more or less stable throughout stand development. Wildfire and harvesting differ in many ways, fire being more of a chemical and harvesting a mechanical disturbance. Fire consumes forest floor and small live vegetation and foliage, whereas logging removes large stems. Overall, the effects of the two disturbances on C dynamics in boreal forest are poorly understood. There is also a scarcity of literature dealing with C dynamics of plant coarse and fine roots, understory vegetation, small-sized and buried dead material, forest floor, and mineral soil.

1 October 2007 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TITriin Ilisson
Triin Ilisson
KKKajar Koster
Kajar Koster
FVFloortje Vodde
Floortje Vodde
Kalev JogisteKalev Jogiste
Kalev Jogiste

31 August 2019 in Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSille Rebane
Sille Rebane
Kalev JogisteKalev Jogiste
Kalev Jogiste
EPEneli Põldveer
Eneli Põldveer
JSJohn A. Stanturf
John A. Stanturf
MMMarek Metslaid
Marek Metslaid
Boreal and temperate forests cover a large part of the Earth. Forest ecosystems are a key focus for research because of their role in the carbon (C) balance and cycle. Increasing atmospheric temperatures, different disturbances (fire, storm and insects) and forest management (clear-cutting) will change considerably the C status of forest ecosystems. Using the eddy covariance (EC) method, we can define interactions among environmental factors that influence the C-balance and whether a forest ecosystem is functioning as a C-sink or C-source or possibly is C-neutral. In our review of published studies of different disturbances, we found that most of the post-disturbance studies based on EC method focused on the effects of forest fire and clear-cutting, only a few studies studies focused on the effects of storms and insects. Generally a forest is a C-source until several years after disturbance and then a forest is able to absorb C and become a C-sink. Recovery to C-sink status required up to 20 years in clear-cut areas. Recovery following wildfire disturbance was much longer, possibly more than 50 years. Recovery to C-sink status required approximately 5 years after storm and insect outbreak, however we can not predict overall recovery period because of the missing data.

20 March 2014 in Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Meelis SeedreMeelis Seedre
Meelis Seedre
ATAnthony R. Taylor
Anthony R. Taylor
BBBrian W. Brassard
Brian W. Brassard
HCHan Chen
Han Chen
Kalev JogisteKalev Jogiste
Kalev Jogiste