Duane Storti

Dr. Duane Storti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 October 2020 in Nature Reviews Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMaroun Abi Ghanem
Maroun Abi Ghanem
ABAmrita Basu
Amrita Basu
RBReza Behrou
Reza Behrou
NBNicholas Boechler
Nicholas Boechler
ABAndrew J. Boydston
Andrew J. Boydston
DSDuane Storti
Duane Storti

11 October 2016 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGregory I. Peterson
Gregory I. Peterson
JSJohanna J. Schwartz
Johanna J. Schwartz
DZDi Zhang
Di Zhang
BWBenjamin M. Weiss
Benjamin M. Weiss
MGMark A. Ganter
Mark A. Ganter
ABAndrew J. Boydston
Andrew J. Boydston

26 April 2018 in Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MYMete Yurtoglu
Mete Yurtoglu
MCMolly Carton
Molly Carton
DSDuane Storti
Duane Storti

19 October 2022 in Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJohn Bartlett
John Bartlett
DSDuane Storti
Duane Storti

12 March 2018 in Rapid Prototyping Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BWBenjamin Weiss
Benjamin Weiss
ODOlaf Diegel
Olaf Diegel
DSDuane Storti
Duane Storti
MGMark Ganter
Mark Ganter
Purpose: Manufacturer specifications for the resolution of an additive manufacturing (AM) machine can be ten times smaller (more optimistic) than the actual size of manufacturable features. Existing methods used to establish a manufacturable design rule-set are conservative piecewise-constant approximations. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a first-order model for producing improved design rule-sets for feature manufacturability, accounting for process variation. Design/methodology/approach: A framework is presented which uses an interpolation method and a statistical model to estimate the minimum size for a wide range of features from a set of iterative experiments. Findings: For an SLS process, using this approach improves the accuracy and reliability of minimum feature size estimates for a wider variety of features than assessed by most existing test artifacts. Research limitations/implications: More research is needed to provide better interpolation models, broaden applicability and account for additional geometric and process parameters which significantly impact the results. This research focuses on manufacturability and does not address dimensional accuracy of the features produced. Practical implications: An application to the design of thin channels in a prosthetic hand shows the utility of the results in a real-world scenario. Originality/value: This study is among the first to investigate statistical variation of “pass/fail” features in AM process characterization, propose a means of estimating minimum feature sizes for shapes not directly tested and incorporate a more efficient iterative experimental protocol.

16 June 2020 in Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CUChristopher Uchytil
Christopher Uchytil
DSDuane Storti
Duane Storti