There is growing evidence that gut dysbiosis contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) owing to several mechanisms, including microbiota-derived uremic toxins, diet and immune-mediated factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a ß-glucan prebiotic on kidney function, uremic toxins and the gut microbiome in stage 3 to 5 CKD participants. Fifty-nine participants were randomized to either the ß-glucan prebiotic intervention group (n = 30) or the control group (n = 29). The primary outcomes were to assess kidney function (urea, creatinine and glomerular filtration rate), plasma levels of total and free levels of uremic toxins (p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), indoxyl-sulfate (IxS), p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG) and indoxyl 3-acetic acid (IAA) and gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing at baseline, week 8 and week 14. The intervention group (age 40.6 ± 11.4 y) and the control group (age 41.3 ± 12.0 y) did not differ in age or any other socio-demographic variables at baseline. There were no significant changes in kidney function over 14 weeks. There was a significant reduction in uremic toxin levels at different time points, in free IxS at 8 weeks (p = 0.003) and 14 weeks (p < 0.001), free pCS (p = 0.006) at 14 weeks and total and free pCG (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) and at 14 weeks. There were no differences in relative abundances of genera between groups. The redundancy analysis showed a few factors significantly affected the gut microbiome: these included triglyceride levels (p < 0.001), body mass index (p = 0.002), high- density lipoprotein (p < 0.001) and the prebiotic intervention (p = 0.002). The ß-glucan prebiotic significantly altered uremic toxin levels of intestinal origin and favorably affected the gut microbiome.

Background: Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a relatively common malignancy after kidney transplantation, accounting for up to 80% of all malignancies in developing countries. Aim: To assess the frequency of KS in renal transplant recipients, and determine the impact of demographic factors, immunosuppression and treatment options. Design: Retrospective study in a single centre in South Africa. Methods: Charts and pathology reports of 542 recipients of 623 kidney allografts treated at our institution between 1976 and 1999 were reviewed. Results: After a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, 21 (3.9%) recipients had KS, representing 47.7% of all post-transplant malignancies. KS accounted for more post-transplant cancers in non-White than White patients (79.1% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001). KS was equally common in males and females, and was not more frequent under cyclosporine. Skin involvement was universal; visceral disease occurred in six patients (28.6%). Sixteen (94.1%) patients with limited skin disease and two (100%) with superficial nodal disease responded to withdrawal or reduction of immunosuppression. Renal function was preserved when immunosuppression was reduced instead of withdrawn (p = 0.02). Patients with vital organ involvement succumbed rapidly to KS. Post-mortem examination revealed more extensive disease than was suspected clinically. Discussion: Ethnic differences exist in the frequency of KS in patients residing in the same geographical area. Since withdrawal results in graft loss, reducing immunosuppression should be first-line treatment for patients with disease limited to skin, and possibly for disease of the superficial lymph nodes. The malignant behaviour of KS, and extent of pathological involvement, cast doubt on the idea that KS is a hyperplasia rather than a true malignancy.

Malignancies are a well-recognized complication of renal transplantation. Although the problem is well studied in developed countries, less is known about it in developing countries. Although geographic and ethnic variations have been alluded to in several reports, to our knowledge the subject has not been investigated formally. From April 1976 through March 1999, 41 (7.6%) patients were diagnosed with cancer among a heterogeneous population of renal allograft recipients treated at our institution in Cape Town, South Africa. The incidence of malignancies was comparable in white and nonwhite patients. However, squamous cell cancer and basal cell cancer of the skin (in that order) were the most common cancers in white patients, in whom they occurred exclusively. On the other hand, Kaposi sarcoma was the most common cancer in nonwhite renal allograft recipients, in whom it accounted for almost 80% of all cancers. Review of the world literature suggests that posttransplant cancers are less common in developing countries; Kaposi sarcoma is the most common lesion, with few exceptions. Malignant lymphomas are also more common in developing countries. The impact of different immunosuppressive regimens is controversial. In general, cyclosporine is not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of cancer after renal transplantation, although the time to the first cancer may be reduced. In our experience, the pattern of posttransplant cancers in white and nonwhite patients living in the same geographic region epitomizes the world experience of the disease and suggests that genetic factors, rather than geography, are the more important determinants of cancer development after renal transplantation.

Universal access to renal replacement therapy is beyond the economic capability of most low and middle-income countries due to large patient numbers and the high recurrent cost of treating end stage kidney disease. In countries where limited access is available, no systems exist that allow for optimal use of the scarce dialysis facilities. We previously reported that using national guidelines to select patients for renal replacement therapy resulted in biased allocation. We reengineered selection guidelines using the ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’ (procedural fairness) framework in collaboration with relevant stakeholders, applying these in a novel way to categorize and prioritize patients in a unique hierarchical fashion. The guidelines were primarily premised on patients being transplantable. We examined whether the revised guidelines enhanced fairness of dialysis resource allocation. This is a descriptive study of 1101 end stage kidney failure patients presenting to a tertiary renal unit in a middle-income country, evaluated for dialysis treatment over a seven-year period. The Assessment Committee used the accountability for reasonableness-based guidelines to allocate patients to one of three assessment groups. Category 1 patients were guaranteed renal replacement therapy, Category 3 patients were palliated, and Category 2 were offered treatment if resources allowed. Only 25.2% of all end stage kidney disease patients assessed were accepted for renal replacement treatment. The majority of patients (48%) were allocated to Category 2. Of 134 Category 1 patients, 98% were accepted for treatment while 438 (99.5%) Category 3 patients were excluded. Compared with those palliated, patients accepted for dialysis treatment were almost 10 years younger, employed, married with children and not diabetic. Compared with our previous selection process our current method of priority setting based on procedural fairness arguably resulted in more equitable allocation of treatment but, more importantly, it is a model that is morally, legally and ethically more defensible.

Important causes of chronic kidney disease in South Africa