Objectives: The two aims of this systematic review and meta‐analysis were to (1) analyze the effect of exercise on chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) severity and (2) determine the best type of exercise for the management of CIPN.Methods: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, WOS, Sportdiscus, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 2020 for experimental studies addressing the effect of exercise on CIPN severity, as measured by symptom severity (SSS) and peripheral deep sensitivity (PDS). The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to compute pooled estimates of the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and its respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the types of exercise and the frequency and length of the interventions.Results: Thirteen studies were included in this meta‐analysis. In the analyses comparing exercise interventions versus controls, there was an improvement in the SSS (SMD = −0.21; 95% CI: −0.40 to −0.01; %change: −20.34%) and the PDS (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.91; %change: 31.64%) in favor of the intervention group. In the pre–post analyses, there was an improvement in the SSS (SMD = −0.72; 95% CI: −1.10 to −0.34; %change: −15.65%) and the PDS (SMD = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.79; %change:18.98%).Conclusions: This meta‐analysis provides an overview of the evidence supporting exercise as a suitable intervention to reduce the severity of CIPN by reducing the severity of the symptoms and the peripheral deep sensitivity among patients with cancer or cancer survivors. Furthermore, sensoriomotor training and mind–body exercises appear to be more effective in reducing symptom severity, and active nerve‐specific exercises and mind–body exercises seem to be more effective in improving peripheral deep sensitivity.

There is overwhelming evidence regarding the beneficial effects of exercise on the management of symptoms, functionality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, few analyze have compared different types of exercise. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to assess which type of physical exercise has the greatest positive effect on HRQoL in people with MS. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception to June 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of physical exercise on HRQoL in people with MS. The NMA included pairwise and indirect comparisons. We ranked the effect of interventions calculating the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). We included 45 RCTs in this NMA (2428 participants; 76% women; mean age 45 years). Five types of physical exercises were ranked. Sensorimotor training had the highest effect size (0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60; 1.15) and the highest SUCRA (87%) for total HRQoL. The highest effect size and SUCRA for physical and mental HRQoL were for aerobic exercise (0.85, 95% CI 0.28; 1.42) (89%) and mind-body exercises (0.54, 95% CI 0.03; 1.06) (89%). Sensorimotor training was the best exercise for mild disease and aerobic exercise for severe disease for total HRQoL. Sensorimotor training seems the most effective exercise to improve HRQoL and aerobic and mind-body exercises to improve physical and mental HRQoL, respectively.

Background: The ageing population brings about the appearance of age-related health disorders, such as osteoporosis or osteopenia. These disorders are associated with fragility fractures. The impact is greater among postmenopausal women due to an acceleration of bone mineral density (BMD) loss.Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of Pilates or Yoga on BMD in adult women.Methods: Five electronics databases were searched up to April 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and pre-post studies were included. The main outcome was BMD. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random effects model was used to pool data from primary studies. Subgroup analyses based on the type of exercise were conducted.Results: Eleven studies including 591 participants aged between 45 and 78 years were included. The mean length of the interventions ranged from 12 to 32 weeks, and two studies were performed for a period of at least one year. The pooled effect size for the effect of the intervention (Pilates/Yoga) vs the control group was 0.07 (95% Confidence interval [CI]: -0.05 to 0.19; I²= 0.0%), and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.18; I²= 18.4%) for the secondary analysis of the pre-post intervention.Conclusions: Despite of the non-significant results, the BMD maintenance in the postmenopausal population, when BMD detrimental is expected, could be understood as a positive result added to the beneficial impact of Pilates-Yoga in multiple fracture risk factors, including but not limited to, strength and balance.

Objective: To estimate the screening performances of the most important provocation tests for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Design: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic review with meta-analysis. Literature Search: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 2020. Study Selection Criteria: Observational studies comparing the accuracies of the Durkan test (DT), the hand elevation test (HET), the Phalen test (PT), the Tinel test (TT), and the upper-limb neurodynamic test specific to the median nerve (ULNT1) with electrodiagnosis for screening for CTS. Data Synthesis: Random-effects models for the diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) values computed by Moses' constant for a linear model and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the accuracy of these tests. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to summarize the overall test performance. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample of 2662 wrists for DT, 864 wrists for HET, 6361 wrists for PT, 6094 wrists for TT, and 571 wrists for ULNT1. The pooled dORs for screening for CTS were 15.84 (95% CI: 3.78, 66.38) for DT, 128.63 (95% CI: 40.64, 407.12) for HET, 7.23 (95% CI: 4.06, 12.86) for PT, 5.31 (95% CI: 3.49, 8.09) for TT, and 1.78 (95% CI: 0.61, 5.19) for ULNT1. Conclusion: HET has the best clinical performance for detecting CTS and should be considered the first screening test of choice during the physical examination. The most common tests (DT, PT, and TT) have good accuracies for screening for CTS. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(8):522–531. Epub: 19 June 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10828