Ulrich Callies

Dr. Ulrich Callies

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2017 in Progress in Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JFJens Floeter
Jens Floeter
JBJustus E.E. van Beusekom
Justus E.E. van Beusekom
DADominik Auch
Dominik Auch
UCUlrich Callies
Ulrich Callies
JCJeffrey Carpenter
Jeffrey Carpenter
CMChristian Möllmann
Christian Möllmann

26 September 2017 in Ocean Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UCUlrich Callies
Ulrich Callies
NGNikolaus Groll
Nikolaus Groll
Jochen HorstmannJochen Horstmann
Jochen Horstmann
HKHartmut Kapitza
Hartmut Kapitza
HKHolger Klein
Holger Klein
FSFabian Schwichtenberg
Fabian Schwichtenberg
Six surface drifters (drogued at about 1 m depth) deployed in the inner German Bight (North Sea) were tracked for between 9 and 54 days. Corresponding simulations were conducted offline based on surface currents from two independent models (BSHcmod and TRIM). Inclusion of a direct wind drag (0.6 % of 10 m wind) was needed for successful simulations based on BSHcmod currents archived for a 5 m depth surface layer. Adding 50 % of surface Stokes drift simulated with a third-generation wave model (WAM) was tested as an alternative approach. Results resembled each other during most of the time. Successful simulations based on TRIM surface currents (1 m depth) suggest that both approaches were mainly needed to compensate insufficient vertical resolution of hydrodynamic currents. The study suggests that the main sources of simulation errors were inaccurate Eulerian currents and lacking representation of sub-grid-scale processes. Substantial model errors often occurred under low wind conditions. A lower limit of predictability (about 3–5 km day−1) was estimated from two drifters that were initially spaced 20 km apart but converged quickly and diverged again after having stayed at a distance of 2 km or less for about 10 days. In most cases, errors in simulated 25 h drifter displacements were of similar order of magnitude.

7 August 2011 in Ocean Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
UCUlrich Callies
Ulrich Callies
APAndreas Plüß
Andreas Plüß
JKJens Kappenberg
Jens Kappenberg
HKHartmut Kapitza
Hartmut Kapitza

1 May 2019 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZLZengkai Liu
Zengkai Liu
UCUlrich Callies
Ulrich Callies
Application of chemical dispersants is one option for combatting oil spills, dispersing oil into the water column and thereby reducing potential pollution to coastal areas. Efficiency of dispersant application depends on oil characteristics, sea and weather conditions. Potential environmental impacts must also be taken into account. Referring to the German Bight region (North Sea), we show how probabilistic Bayesian network (BN) technology can integrate all these aspects to support contingency planning. Expected effects of chemical dispersion on oil spill drift paths are quantified based on comprehensive numerical ensemble simulations. Ecological impacts are represented just in simplified terms focusing on nearshore seabird distributions. The intuitive and interactive BN summarizes expected benefits from chemical dispersion depending on where and under which weather conditions a hypothetical pollution occurs.

1 November 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRoland Cormier
Roland Cormier
VSVanessa Stelzenmüller
Vanessa Stelzenmüller
ICIrena Creed
Irena Creed
JIJason Igras
Jason Igras
HRHenrike Rambo
Henrike Rambo
Lucinda JohnsonLucinda Johnson
Lucinda Johnson

1 September 2017 in Journal of Sea Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMarc Hufnagl
Marc Hufnagl
MPMark R. Payne
Mark R. Payne
GLGeneviève Lacroix
Geneviève Lacroix
LBLoes J. Bolle
Loes J. Bolle
UDUte Daewel
Ute Daewel
UCUlrich Callies
Ulrich Callies
Hydrodynamic Ocean Circulation Models and Lagrangian particle tracking models are valuable tools e.g. in coastal ecology to identify the connectivity between offshore spawning and coastal nursery areas of commercially important fish, for risk assessment and more for defining or evaluating marine protected areas. Most studies are based on only one model and do not provide levels of uncertainty. Here this uncertainty was addressed by applying a suite of 11 North Sea models to test what variability can be expected concerning connectivity. Different notional test cases were calculated related to three important and well-studied North Sea fish species: herring (Clupea harengus), and the flatfishes sole (Solea solea) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). For sole and plaice we determined which fraction of particles released in the respective spawning areas would reach a coastal marine protected area. For herring we determined the fraction located in a wind park after a predefined time span. As temperature is more and more a focus especially in biological and global change studies, furthermore inter-model variability in temperatures experienced by the virtual particles was determined. The main focus was on the transport variability originating from the physical models and thus biological behavior was not included. Depending on the scenario, median experienced temperatures differed by 3. °C between years. The range between the different models in one year was comparable to this temperature range observed between modelled years. Connectivity between flatfish spawning areas and the coastal protected area was highly dependent on the release location and spawning time. No particles released in the English Channel in the sole scenario reached the protected area while up to 20 of the particles released in the plaice scenario did. Interannual trends in transport directions and connectivity rates were comparable between models but absolute values displayed high variations. Most models showed systematic biases during all years in comparison to the ensemble median, indicating that in general interannual variation was represented but absolute values varied. In conclusion: variability between models is generally high and management decisions or scientific analysis using absolute values from only one single model might be biased and results or conclusions drawn from such studies need to be treated with caution. We further concluded that more true validation data for particle modelling are required. © 2017 Elsevier B.V