James Gavin Bremner

Dr. James Gavin Bremner


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

50Years (1977-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 November 2009 in Psychological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPeter Walker
Peter Walker
JBJames Gavin Bremner
James Gavin Bremner
UMUschi Mason
Uschi Mason
JSJo Spring
Jo Spring
KMKaren Mattock
Karen Mattock
SJScott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson
Stimulation of one sensory modality can induce perceptual experiences in another modality that reflect synaesthetic correspondences among different dimensions of sensory experience. In visual-hearing synaesthesia, for example, higher pitched sounds induce visual images that are brighter, smaller, higher in space, and sharper than those induced by lower pitched sounds. Claims that neonatal perception is synaesthetic imply that such correspondences are an unlearned aspect of perception. To date, the youngest children in whom such correspondences have been confirmed with any certainty were 2- to 3-year-olds. We examined preferential looking to assess 3- to 4-month-old preverbal infants’ sensitivity to the correspondences linking auditory pitch to visuospatial height and visual sharpness. The infants looked longer at a changing visual display when this was accompanied by a sound whose changing pitch was congruent, rather than incongruent, with these correspondences. This is the strongest indication to date that synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences are an unlearned aspect of perception.

1 February 1977 in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames Gavin Bremner
James Gavin Bremner
PBP.E Bryant
P.E Bryant

1 April 2000 in Infancy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAlan Slater
Alan Slater
JBJames Gavin Bremner
James Gavin Bremner
SJScott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson
PSPenny Sherwood
Penny Sherwood
RHRachel Hayes
Rachel Hayes
EBElizabeth Brown
Elizabeth Brown
Several previous experiments have found that newborn and young infants will spend more time looking at attractive faces when these are shown paired with faces judged by adults to be unattractive. Two experimental conditions are described with the aim of finding whether the “attractiveness effect” results from attention to internal or external facial features, or both. Pairs of attractive and less attractive faces (as judged by adults) were shown to newborn infants (mean age 2 days, 9 hours), where each pair had either identical internal features (and different external features) or identical external features (and different internal features). In the latter, but not the former, condition the infants looked longer at the attractive faces. These findings are clear evidence that newborn infants use information about internal facial features in making preferences based on attractiveness. It is suggested that when newborn (and older) infants are presented with facial stimuli, whether dynamic or static, they are able to attend both to internal and external facial features.

1 February 2003 in Child Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJScott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson
JBJames Gavin Bremner
James Gavin Bremner
ASAlan Slater
Alan Slater
UMUschi Mason
Uschi Mason
KFKirsty Foster
Kirsty Foster
ACAndrea Cheshire
Andrea Cheshire

1 February 1978 in British Journal of Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJames Gavin Bremner
James Gavin Bremner

18 February 2015 in Child Development Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJames Gavin Bremner
James Gavin Bremner
ASAlan M. Slater
Alan M. Slater
SJScott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson