Traveller's diarrhoea (TD) is the most common illness reported in international travellers. TD is caused by a wide range of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and parasites. Multiplex PCR assays can be especially useful for studying the aetiology of TD. The first objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of the commercially available multiplex PCR (xTAG^® Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (GPP)) for the diagnosis of TD. A total of 185 stool specimens obtained from 174 patients were processed using the GPP assay. This test detected 86 pathogens in 67 stool samples (67/185, 36.2%). Sixteen pathogens out of 86 were also detected by routine testing. The remaining pathogens (n = 70) required further confirmation by alternative techniques. Finally, 60 out of 70 pathogens were confirmed. The second objective of this study was to analyse the aetiology of TD based on the results obtained by the GPP test and routine methods. The primary pathogens causing TD were Shigella (24.2%) followed by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (23.2%), enteroaggregative E. coli (14.7%) and Giardia (13.7%). Significant regional differences were observed for ETEC with 19.4% of TD cases acquired in Africa, 11.3% in Asia and none in South Central (SC) America (p 0.01), Giardia was found in 1.5% of cases among those who had travelled to Africa, 14.1% of those who had travelled to Asia and 3% of those who had travelled to SC America (p 0.01). In conclusion, the GPP test improved the detection of enteropathogens and allowed better assessment of the aetiology of TD.

The objective of this study was to assess the antimicrobial resistance of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) causing traveler’s diarrhea (TD) and investigate the molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance genes to third generation cephalosporins, chepamycins and quinolones. Overall, 39 EAEC and 43 ETEC clinical isolates were studied. The susceptibility of EAEC and ETEC against ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, imipenem, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, cotrimoxazole, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin and rifaximin was determined. All genes encoding resistant determinants were detected by PCR or PCR and DNA sequencing. The epidemiology of selected EAEC and ETEC strains was studied using MLST. The resistance to quinolones of EAEC and ETEC strains causing TD has significantly increased over the last decades, and high percentages has been found especially in patients traveling to India and sub-Saharan Africa. The ST38 and ST131 carrying the bla_CTX-M-15 and bla_CTX-M-27 genes, respectively, are highly prevalent among ESBL-producing EAEC and ETEC. The cephamycinase ACT-20 is described in the present study for the first time in EAEC and ETEC strains causing TD in patients who had traveled to Central America. The percentages of resistance to azithromycin in EAEC and ETEC isolates from patients to South-East Asia/India and Africa are above 25%. Meanwhile, rifaximin is still active against EAEC and ETEC with the prevalence of resistant strains not being high. In conclusion, fluoroquinolones should no longer be considered the drugs of choice for the prevention or treatment in TD for travelers traveling to India and Africa. Azithromycin and rifaximin are still a good alternative to treat TD caused by EAEC or ETEC.

In a prospective study of 660 HIV-positive Malawian adults, we diagnosed Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PcP) using clinical features, induced sputum for immunofluorescent staining, real-time PCR, and posttreatment follow-up. PcP incidence was highest in patients with the lowest CD4 counts but uncommon compared with incidences of pulmonary tuberculosis and bacterial pneumonia.

Seasonal influenza causes significant morbidity and mortality and has a substantial economic impact on the healthcare system. The main objective of this study was to compare the cost per patient for a rapid commercial PCR assay (Xpert^® Flu) with an in-house real-time PCR test for detecting influenza virus. Community patients with influenza like-illness attending the Emergency Department (ED) as well as hospitalized patients in the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona were included. Costs were evaluated from the perspective of the hospital considering the use of resources directly related to influenza testing and treatment. For the purpose of this study, 366 and 691 patients were tested in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The Xpert^® Flu test reduced the mean waiting time for patients in the ED by 9.1 hours and decreased the mean isolation time of hospitalized patients by 23.7 hours. This was associated with a 103€ (or about $113) reduction in the cost per patient tested in the ED and 64€ ($70) per hospitalized patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that Xpert^® Flu is likely to be cost-saving in hospitals with different contexts and prices.