The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is crucial for food digestion and nutrient absorption in humans. However, the GI tract is usually challenged with oxidative stress that can be induced by various factors, such as exogenous pathogenic microorganisms and dietary alterations. As a part of gut microbiota, Lactobacillus spp. play an important role in modulating oxidative stress in cells and tissues, especially in the GI tract. Oxidative stress is linked with excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can be formed by a few enzymes, such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidases (NOXs). The redox mechanisms of Lactobacillus spp. may contribute to the downregulation of these ROS-forming enzymes. In addition, nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NFE2)-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) are two common transcription factors, through which Lactobacillus spp. modulate oxidative stress as well. As oxidative stress is closely associated with inflammation and certain diseases, Lactobacillus spp. could potentially be applied for early treatment and amelioration of these diseases, either individually or together with prebiotics. However, further research is required for revealing their mechanisms of action as well as their extensive application in the future.

Ongoing changes in taxonomic methods, and in the rapid development of the taxonomic structure of species assigned to the Epsilonproteobacteria have lead the International Committee of Systematic Bacteriology Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Campylobacter and Related Bacteria to discuss significant updates to previous minimal standards for describing new species of Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae . This paper is the result of these discussions and proposes minimum requirements for the description of new species belonging to the families Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae , thus including species in Campylobacter, Arcobacter , Helicobacter , and Wolinella . The core underlying principle remains the use of appropriate phenotypic and genotypic methods to characterise strains sufficiently so as to effectively and unambiguously determine their taxonomic position in these families, and provide adequate means by which the new taxon can be distinguished from extant species and subspecies. This polyphasic taxonomic approach demands the use of appropriate reference data for comparison to ensure the novelty of proposed new taxa, and the recommended study of at least five strains to enable species diversity to be assessed. Methodological approaches for phenotypic and genotypic (including whole-genome sequence comparisons) characterisation are recommended.

This paper re-examines the taxonomic positions of recently described Poseidonibacter (P. parvum and P. antarcticus ), Aliarcobacter (‘Al. vitoriensis’), Halarcobacter (‘H. arenosus’) and Arcobacter ( A. caeni , A. lacus ) species, and other species proposed to represent novel genera highly related to the genus Arcobacter . Phylogenomic and several overall genome relatedness indices (OGRIs) were applied to a total of 118 representative genomes for this purpose. Phylogenomic analyses demonstrated the Arcobacter clade to be distinct from other Epsilonproteobacteria , clearly defined and containing closely related species. Aliarcobacter butzleri and Malaciobacter pacificus did not cluster with other members of these proposed genera, indicating incoherence of these genera. Every OGRI measure applied indicated a high level of relatedness among all Arcobacter clade species, including the recently described taxa studied here, and substantially lower between type species representatives for other Epsilonproteobacteria. Where published guidelines were available, OGRI values for Arcobacter clade species were either unsupportive of division into other genera or were at the lowest boundary range (for average amino acid identity). We propose that Aliarcobacter , Halarcobacter , Malaciobacter , Pseudarcobacter , Poseidonibacter and Arcobacter sensu stricto be considered members of a single genus, Arcobacter , and subsequently transfer P. parvum, P. antarcticus , ‘ Al. vitoriensis ’ and ‘H. arenosus’ to Arcobacter as Arcobacter parvum comb. nov., Arcobacter antarcticus comb. nov., Arcobacter vitoriensis comb. nov. and Arcobacter arenosus comb. nov.