Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites can be used for remote sensing and gravity field recovery, while precise orbit determination (POD) is vital for LEO satellite applications. However, there are some systematic errors when using the LEO satellite orbits released by different agencies in multi-satellite-based applications, e.g., Swarm and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment-Follow-On (GRACE-FO), as different GNSS precise orbit and clock products are used as well as processing strategies and software. In this paper, we performed undifferenced kinematic PODs for Swarm and GRACE-FO satellites simultaneously over a total of 14 days by using consistent International Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Service (IGS) precise orbit and clock products. The processing strategy based on an undifferenced ionosphere-free combination and a least squares method was applied for Swarm and GRACE-FO satellites. Furthermore, the quality control for the kinematic orbits was adopted to mitigate abrupt position offsets. Moreover, the accuracy of the kinematic orbits solution was evaluated by carrier phase residual analysis and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations, as well as comparison with official orbits. The results show that the kinematic orbits solution is better than 4 cm, according to the SLR validation. With quality control, the accuracy of the kinematic orbit solution is improved by 2.49 % for the Swarm-C satellite and 6.98 % for the GRACE-D satellite when compared with their precise orbits. By analyzing the accuracy of the undifferenced kinematic orbit solution, the reliability of the LEO orbit determination is presented in terms of processing strategies and quality control procedures.

A multi-frequency Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) provides greater opportunities for positioning and navigation applications, particularly the BeiDou Global Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3) satellites. However, multi-frequency signals import more pseudorange channels, which introduce more multi-channel Differential Code Biases (DCBs). The satellite and receiver DCBs from the new BDS-3 signals are not clear. In this study, 9 DCB types of the new BDS-3 signals from 30-days Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) observations are estimated and investigated. Compared with the DCB values provided by the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) products, the mean bias and root mean squares (RMS) error of new BDS-3 satellite DCBs are within ±0.20 and 0.30 ns, respectively. The satellite DCBs are mostly within ±0.40 ns with respect to the product of the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR). The four sets of constructed closure errors and their mean values are within ±0.30 ns and ±0.15 ns, respectively. The mean standard deviation (STD) of the estimated satellite DCBs is less than 0.10 ns. In particular, our estimated satellite DCBs are more stable than DCB products provided by CAS and DLR. Unlike satellite DCBs, the receiver DCBs have poor compliance and show an obvious relationship with the geographic latitude when compared to the CAS products. The STDs of our estimated receiver DCBs are less than 1.00 ns. According to different types of receiver DCBs, the distribution of STDs indicates that the coefficient of the ionospheric correction has an influence on the stability of the receiver DCBs under the ionosphere with the same accuracy level. In addition, the type of receiver shows no regular effects on the stability of receiver DCBs.