The impact of sandblasting, anodic oxidation, and anodic oxidation after sandblasting on the surface structure and properties of titanium alloys was investigated. It was found that the surface treatments had a significant influence on the surface roughness values, contact angle values, Vickers hardness, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance of titanium alloys. The surface roughness of titanium alloys with sandblasting treatment was increased by 67% compared to untreated specimen. The Vickers hardness of titanium alloys treated with anodic oxidation after sandblasting was found to increase from 380.8 HV to 408.5 HV, which was increased by 7.3%. The surface treatments in this work improved the wear resistance of the titanium alloys to some extent, and it can be found that the wear scar width is reduced by up to 18.6%. The corrosion resistance of the titanium alloys was found to improve on anodic oxidation. Sandblasting was found to increase surface roughness and promote the formation of a porous layer during the anodization process, resulting in a slight decrease in corrosion resistance. The corrosion current density was increased by 21% compared to the untreated specimen. The corrosion current density of the titanium alloy treated with anodic oxidation decreased to 7.01 × 10⁻⁸ A/cm². The corrosion current density was decreased by 24% compared to the untreated specimen. The corrosion current density of the titanium alloys treated with anodic oxidation after sandblasting decreased to 7.63 × 10⁻⁸ A/cm². The corrosion current density was decreased by 8.8% compared to the specimen with anodic oxidation. The anodic oxidation provided a hydrophilic property for the surface of Ti alloys, which could show a better osseointegration characteristic than that of sandblasting. The impact of the surface treatments on surface structure and properties of titanium alloys was studied.

Two types of coatings, i.e., monolayer Ta and multilayer Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coatings, were deposited on biomedical Ti6Al4V (TC4) alloy by magnetron sputtering to improve its performance. To evaluate the effect of the two coatings on the alloy properties, the microstructure, composition, mechanical and tribological properties, in vitro biocompatibility, and corrosion resistance were investigated. The results showed that α-Ta exists in the monolayer Ta coating, while α-Ta and β-Ta phases coexist in the multilayer Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coating. The multilayer Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coating possessed the highest hardness and the monolayer Ta coating had the lowest friction coefficient compared to the Ti6Al4V alloy. The friction and wear tests revealed that the anti-wear performance of the Ta coating is the best, followed by that of the Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coating, while the anti-wear performance of TC4 alloy is relatively poor in comparison with the Ta and Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coatings. The wear resistance of the multilayer Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coating under low normal load is better than that under high load normal load. Finally, the in vitro and electrochemical corrosion tests showed that the Ta coating modification provides better biocompatibility and corrosion resistance than those of the uncoated Ti6Al4V alloy.