Stanford Gibson

Dr. Stanford Gibson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 March 2009 in Sedimentology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGStanford Gibson
Stanford Gibson
DADavid Abraham
David Abraham
RHRonald Heath
Ronald Heath
DSDavid Schoellhamer
David Schoellhamer

14 March 2022 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGStanford Gibson
Stanford Gibson
LMLeonardo Zandonadi Moura
Leonardo Zandonadi Moura
CACameron Ackerman
Cameron Ackerman
NONikolas Ortman
Nikolas Ortman
RARenato Amorim
Renato Amorim
ASAlejandro Sánchez
Alejandro Sánchez
The Santa Barbara post-wildfire debris flows and the Brumadinho tailing-dam failure were two of the most catastrophic flood events of the late 2010s. Both these events carried so much solid-phase material, that classic, clear-water, flood risk approaches cannot replicate them, or forecast other events like them. This case study applied the new non-Newtonian features in HEC-RAS 6.1 to these two events, testing the most widely used flood risk model on the two most common mud and debris flow hazards (post-wildfire floods and mine tailing dam failures). HEC-RAS reproduced the inundation boundaries and the event timing (where available) for both events. The ratio between the largest debris flow clasts and the channel size, parametric trade-offs, the “convex” alluvial plain topography, and the stochasticity introduced by urban infrastructure made the Santa Barbara modeling more difficult and less precise than Brumadinho. Despite these challenges, the results provide prototype scale validation and verification of these new tools in this widely applied flood risk model.

10 December 2020 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGStanford Gibson
Stanford Gibson
IFI. Floyd
I. Floyd
ASA. Sánchez
A. Sánchez
RHR. Heath
R. Heath

4 November 2015 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGStanford Gibson
Stanford Gibson
GPGregory Pasternack
Gregory Pasternack

18 May 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
SGStanford Gibson
Stanford Gibson
ASA. SánChez
A. SánChez
SPS. Piper
S. Piper
GBG. Brunner
G. Brunner
The current version (5.0) of the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and the imminent version (5.1) include an array of new sediment transport capabilities. Previous HEC-RAS versions were limited to quasi-unsteady flow and vertical bed change. HEC-RAS 5.0 and later versions eliminate each of these limitations, including unsteady flow capabilities, lateral cross section change with the USDA-ARS bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM), and several other features that expand the model’s applicability. Coupling sediment transport with the HEC-RAS unsteady flow capabilities also leverages unsteady capabilities for sediment analysis, including mixed flow regimes, lateral and inline structures, and operational rules. Additionally, recent versions of HEC-RAS include new bed change algorithms, cohesive transport approaches, armoring methods, and an array of new output options. This paper will highlight the new one-dimensional (1D) sediment capabilities in recent versions of HEC-RAS.

4 January 2024 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCPedro D. Barrera Crespo
Pedro D. Barrera Crespo
PGPablo Espinoza Girón
Pablo Espinoza Girón
RBRenán Bedoya
Renán Bedoya
SGStanford Gibson
Stanford Gibson
AEAmy E. East
Amy E. East
PBPaul Boyd
Paul Boyd
The failure of a 144‐m‐high lava‐dam waterfall on the Río Coca, Ecuador, in February 2020 initiated a catastrophic watershed reset—regressive erosion upstream and a massive sediment pulse downstream—as the river evolves towards a new equilibrium grade. The evolution of this river corridor after a sudden base‐level fall embodies the “complex response” concepts long understood through laboratory experiments, numerical modelling and smaller‐scale field studies, but that have not been observed in the field before on this scale. This paper presents geomorphic and geotechnical data to characterize the evolution of the Río Coca since 2020. In the three years after the lava‐dam failure, the erosion front migrated almost 13 km upstream along the mainstem river and triggered secondary headcuts that began migrating up tributaries. Erosion of the mainstem and tributary valleys generated a sediment pulse estimated to be 277 million m3 and ~500 million tonnes (Mt) over three years, depositing sediment tens of meters thick over tens of kilometres downstream from the former waterfall. This sediment pulse is one of the largest in modern times, comparable to the annual sediment load of a major continent‐draining river but with orders‐of‐magnitude greater sediment yield. Geomorphic adjustment of the Río Coca represents a highly unusual natural disaster threatening life, property, water quality, the regional economy, major infrastructure and energy security. However, this event also provides a rare opportunity to learn how a large autogenic watershed disturbance and recovery evolve, with important lessons for interpreting the sedimentary record of volcanic landscapes.