To explore the fast, accurate, and efficient remote sensing identification method of cultivated land quality, this study took Shandong Province as the study area, and used measured data to carry out the soil quality evaluation based on conventional GIS. On this basis, MODIS sequence images were used as remote sensing data sources, and multi-source data such as topography, meteorology, and statistical yearbook were fused. Then, according to the Pressure-State-Response framework, we constructed three kinds of characteristic indicators through distinguishing crop rotation types and fusing remote sensing data. Finally, the soil quality grade was identified by the random forest method, and the accuracy analysis was carried out. The results showed that the NDVI peak values of double-season crops are in mid-April and mid-August, and one-season crops are in mid-August. Through evaluation, soil quality was divided into three categories, with six grades. Through principal component analysis, each soil status indicator contains two to three principal components, and each principal component contains five to eight temporal crop remote sensing information. After distinguishing crop rotation types and fusing remote sensing images, the identification accuracy of soil quality is significantly improved. The overall accuracy is 79.18%, 86.12%, and 93.65%, and the Kappa coefficient is 0.66, 0.77, and 0.90, respectively. This research developed an automatic identification method for cultivated land quality grade, and it proved that distinguishing crop rotation types and fusing multi-temporal crop remote sensing information are effective ways to improve identification accuracy.

It is an objective demand for sustainable agricultural development to realize fast and accurate cultivated land quality assessment. In this paper, Tengzhou city (county-scale hilly area: scale A), Shanghe county (county-scale plain area: scale B), and Huang-Huai-Hai region (including large-scale hilly and plain area: scale C and D) were taken as research areas. Through the conversion of evaluation systems, the inversion models at the county-scale were constructed. Then, the image scale conversion was carried out based on the numerical regression method, and the upscaling inversion was realized. The results showed that: (1) the conversion models of evaluation systems (CMES) are Y = 1.021x − 4.989 (CMES_A−B), Y = 0.801x + 16.925 (CMES_A−C), and Y = 0.959x + 3.458 (CMES_C−D); (2) the booting stage is the best inversion phase; (3) the back propagation neural network model based on the combination index group (CI-BPNN) is the best inversion model, with the R² are 0.723 (modeling set) and 0.722 (verification set). CI-BPNN and CI-BPNN-CMES_A−B models are suitable for the hilly and plain areas at the county-scale, and the level area ratio difference is less than 4.87%. Furthermore, (4) the reflectance conversion model of short-wave infrared 2 is cubic, and the rest are quadratic. CI-BPNN-CMES_A−C and CI-BPNN-CMES_A−C-CMES_C−D models realized upscaling inversion in the hilly and plain areas, with the maximum level area ratio difference being 1.60%. Additionally, (5) the wheat field quality has improved steadily since 2001 in the Huang-Huai-Hai region. This study proposes an upscaling inversion method of wheat field quality, which provides a scientific basis for cultivated land management and agricultural production in large areas.

The evaluation of the level of farmland infrastructure is a necessary objective condition for the use of arable land and agricultural development. In order to investigate the evaluation index system and method of farmland infrastructure level, this article uses the Kenli District of the Yellow River Delta as the research region. In the study region, six typical observation sample areas are chosen. Each area receives high-resolution UAV photos, which are then used to extract information about the farmland infrastructure of the field. A farming infrastructure evaluation index system was built, consisting of 10 indexes for four aspects, including farmland roads, field plots, ditches, and forest belts, using the 100 m by 100 m grid method to divide the evaluation units. The comprehensive index technique was used to calculate the farmland infrastructure score of each unit and identify the degree of excellent, good, and poor farmland infrastructure. The weight of each indication was decided by the hierarchical analysis method. There were 20 excellent grades, 77 good grades, and 29 poor grades among the 126 evaluation units in the study area, with excellent and good grades accounting for 79.13% and area proportions of 14.29%, 64.84%, and 20.87%, respectively. Among the six sample areas, sample areas E and F had the highest percentages of excellent grades, sample area A had 82.62% of the good grades, and all sample areas except A and C had a percentage of poor grades that was higher than 20%. Regularity of the fields, average size of the fields, and the agricultural plot’s slope are the dominant indexes of farmland infrastructure in each observation sample area, and the indexes of the ratio of the perimeter of roads to the perimeter of fields, density of ditches, and the ratio of area of agricultural forest networks to area of fields need to be optimized and improved. The spatial distribution of each grade differs significantly. The evaluation results are consistent with the real situation in the study region and have positive reference meaning for the development and management of farming infrastructure, according to the study’s proposed evaluation system and methodology.